Skip to item: of 380
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎160v] (324/380)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (187 folios). It was created in 1 Jul 1916-7 Dec 1918. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

20
Nevertheless, it will be well to bear in mind (a) that the population is Greek, and
(b) that we have already offered the island to Greece during the war, and that at a
time when Greece was not yet an ally or a belligerent. ^
His Majesty’s Government are not, indeed, called upon to make any sacrifice of terri
tory which is legitimately under British sovereigntv. It is only if a political situation
should arise in which it would be useful for His Majesty’s Government to have in hand
a pawn convenient for negotiating a general settlement that a possible cession of
Cyprus to Greece might come up for consideration. To what extent, however, such
cession would aftect important strategical interests of this country is a question which
could only be answered by the naval and military authorities. In this connection it
may be noted that, when the functions of an “assisting Power” are defined, it must
be laid down clearly that an invitation to provide assistance shall not carry with it the
right to make use of strategic points in the assisted country. For instance, if France
assists Armenia (see below), there must be no question of a French naval base being
established at Alexandretta.
(v.) Armenia.
i he general principle of “ self-determination ” applies to Armenia, but in this
particular case the principle of “ equal rights for all nationalities ” should take
priority, since throughout the country there is a mixed population with divergent
economic interests and traditional feuds, which cannot be got rid of so easily as the
Turkish administration that fomented them. The maintenance of this principle should
be the first duty of the mandatory Power.
It would be expedient to extend the area of Armenia as widely as possible, so as
to include all territories north of the Arab boundary in which there is a mixed
population of lurks, Armenians, and Kurds. This would at the same time conduce
to a stable settlement, and would indirectly be of advantage to His Majesty’s
Government. The choice of a mandatory virtually lies between France and America.
If branee were chosen, she would obtain a sphere of activity in this direction far wider
than that accorded to her under the Agreement of 1916 (see the boundaries of the Blue
Area), and this should make her more ready to forgo her claims, under that Agreement,
in Syria, in case these claims were not confirmed by the choice of the Syrians
themselves. It would be to our advantage, for the same reason, to encourage Russian
Armenia to unite with Turkish Armenia under a single regime, and to favour the
extension of French assistance to the other Caucasian countries, which will be in need
of help from outside and will hardly be able to obtain it from Russia.*
The attitude of the Armenians may be gathered from the communication recently
addressed to the French and the British Governments by their National Delegation at
Paris. They claim the right to set up an independent Armenian State under the joint
protection of the “Allied Great Powers,’’j - one of whom is to be aske<i to act as a
mandatory “ for the organisation and administration of the new State for a term of
years. An organic statute drawn up by the Protecting Powers would lay down the
main lines of the administration of the new State during the period of transition,
sanctioning the convocation of a Constituent Assembly, at a date approximately
defined, which would determine the form of government to be adopted permanently,
subject to the approval of the Protecting Powers. The provisional administration to
last long enough, but only so long, as will be necessary to enable the survivors of the
deported Armenians, and Armenians from other parts, to return to their ‘ National
Home.’ ”
The principle of equality for all elements in the population is not disputed. On
the other hand, in settling the proportional claims of these various elements to a voice
in the government of the country, it should be laid down in Armenia that the dead and
the exiles should be taken into account, and Armenian immigrants from other parts of
the world into Armenia should be given the same facilities as Jewish immigrants into
Palestine (see below) for settling down in their ancestral homes.
(vi.) Arab Countries in General and Kurdistan.
We should apply the general principles of self-determination and free choice of
assisting Power, and should ask King Husein formally to accept these principles in lieu
of the territorial boundaries of “ Arab Independence ” which we are pledged to him to-
* !^e<* memorandum by Sir Eyre Crowe, circulated to tlie Eastern Committee,
f Presumably this formula is intended to include the United States.

About this item

Content

This file contains correspondence, memoranda, maps, manuscript notes, and other papers relating to the political and territorial settlement of parts of the Middle East following the First World War. Many of the papers were collected for the attention of the Middle East Committee (later named the Eastern Committee, following the mergence of the Foreign Office's Russia Committee and the interdepartmental Persia Committee) of the War Cabinet. Contributors include officials from the War Office, Foreign Office, Admiralty, and India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , as well as indivduals such as Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence. Correspondence comes from representatives of the French and Italian governments as well as British officials in Cairo and other parts of the Middle East.

The papers deal with plans for the region presuming and following an Allied victory in the First World War and take into consideration the imperial ambitions of the victorious European Powers (France, Italy, Russia, Britain, and the United States) and the multitudinous commitments made by the British to various groups. The plans are based on evolving agreements rooted in the Sykes-Picot, or Asia Minor, Agreement between the British and French of 1916. Regions under consideration include the Hejaz (sometimes written Hedjaz), Syria, Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, Palestine, Armenia, Turkey, the Idrisi state, Yemen, Persia, and Afghanistan. Various matters are covered in the file, but particular focus is given to plans for the Sherifian family of the Hejaz, led by King Husein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī], which impacted upon policy in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine, and the Arabian Peninsula. Other matters include the situation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, wartime commitments to ruling shaikhs in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , the French position in the region, and desiderata of the Government of India for any peace settlement.

Extent and format
1 file (187 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged in chronological order from the front to the back.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front first page with 1, and terminates at the inside back last page with 187; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎160v] (324/380), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/277, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00007d> [accessed 28 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00007d">Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [&lrm;160v] (324/380)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00007d">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0324.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image