Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [50v] (100/544)
The record is made up of 1 file (272 folios). It was created in 13 Mar 1918-7 Jan 1919. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
6
in that country. Ine position to-day was that the Persian Govern
ment was changing, tnat we found great difficulty in reinforcing
our troops, and that the tribes were rendered restless by the
presence of our troops as well as by enemy agents. We had now
strengthened our Hama dan cordon and he proposed that we should
tell Teheran that, if a Persian Government would come in as our
ally to the extent of keeping out Turkish forces and removing
German agents, we would not concern ourselves any more with the
South Persia Rifles; we would strengthen our cordon and give
Persia all the assistance we could. He invited the Committee to
refer to a paper by Mr. Oliphant (E.C.-526) recording an interest
ing conversation with the Persian Minister. He had in his hand
the draft of a telegram prepared at the Foreign Office, and based
on that conversation. He had three comments to make upon this
draft: first, that Marling should let it be known in Teheran that
we were ready to enter into negotiations with any friendly Persian
Government about the South Persia Rifles. He himself main
tained that we could obtain a Government friendly to us by
declaring our readiness to hand over the force at once. Secondly,
there was nothing in the draft about an alliance; and thirdly,
nothing was said about the expulsion of Wassmuss. He main
tained that we must get Persia definitely on our side by a formal
treaty, so that if the Germans attacked, our position would be
that of going to the assistance of “ our brave allies." We ought
to tell Marling that we attach real importance to getting the
Persian Government on our side, and that, to achieve this, he
should use the South Persia Rifles for purposes of bargaining.
The Chairman said that there were several questions arising
out of Mr. Montagu’s proposal. The South Persia Rifles were
nominally a Persian force, but they were not recognised by the
Persian Government, who were always contending for two things,
that the South Persia Rifles should be under the Persian Govern
ment, and that they should be officered by neutrals after the war.
He pointed out the danger of handing over as many as 6,000
armed men, who might even join hands with Wassmuss, and who .
would almost certainly roam about Southern Persia, looting. We
must have a guarantee as to their behaviour during the war, and
it was desirable, therefore, that they should be kept in existence,
at any rate on the side of Kerman. Again, if they were to con
tinue to exist, they must have a commander, and who should this
commander be? He himself had sometimes regretted that Colonel
Stokes, rather than Sir P. Sykes, had not been given the appoint
ment. Incidentally he thought that if we made any proposals to
the Persian Government, we might employ Stokes, who was a
persona grata with the Persians. Again, if we handed over the
South Persia Rifles to the Persian Government, who would pay
them? It was not to be expected that we should go on paying
them, and yet relinquish our control. Further, as to the terms to
be made, what was it proposed to do with Sir P. Sykes? He had
been 20-30 years in Persia, where he was liked, though the Chair
man believed that he was regarded by the democratic party in
Persia as unfavourable to Persian nationalism. Also, what was to
happen at Teheran? A complete change of policy had been sug
gested: was Sir C. Marling the right man to carry it out, since he
was regarded by the Persians as the leading exponent of the Anglo-
Russian Convention School? We had also to consider the attitude
of the Persian Government towards the Anglo-Russian Conven
tion. We had announced that we regarded the treaty as in sus
pense, but in the absence of a stable Russian Government had
refrained from'abrogating it at once. Was there any good reason
why it should not be frankly denounced, as it was already quite
dead? W e had then to consider what would become of our regulars
in South Persia, where much disorder would ensue if we created,
and left, a vacuum. The Persian Minister, in his interview with
About this item
- Content
This file is composed of papers produced by the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee, which was chaired by George Curzon for most of its existence. The file contains a complete set of printed minutes, beginning with the committee's first meeting on 28 March 1918, and concluding with its final meeting on 7 January 1919 (ff 6-214 and ff 227-272).
The file begins with two copies of a memorandum by Curzon, dated 13 March 1918, proposing the formation of the Eastern Committee. This is followed by a memorandum by Arthur James Balfour, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, approving Curzon's proposal, and a copy of a procedure for the newly created committee, outlining arrangements for committee meetings and the dissemination of information to committee members.
Also included is a set of resolutions, passed by the committee in December 1918, in order to guide British representatives at the Paris Peace conference (ff 216-225). The resolutions cover the following: the Caucasus and Armenia; Syria; Palestine; Hejaz and Arabia; Mesopotamia, Mosul, Baghdad and Basra. They are preceded by a handwritten note written by Curzon 'some years later', which remarks on how they are a 'rather remarkable forecast of the bulk of the results since obtained.'
- Extent and format
- 1 file (272 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 272; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [50v] (100/544), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/274, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100069672677.0x000065> [accessed 19 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069672677.0x000065
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069672677.0x000065">Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [‎50v] (100/544)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069672677.0x000065"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a8/Mss Eur F112_274_0100.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a8/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/274
- Title
- Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee
- Pages
- 1r:214v, 216r:272v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [‎50v] (100/544) Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [‎50v] (100/544)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a8/Mss Eur F112_274_0100.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)