'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [222v] (443/501)
The record is made up of 251 folios (1 file). It was created in 15 Nov 1922-3 Nov 1923. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
give them the opportunity of repeating these manoeuvres, which would become
intensified if permanent occupation were guaranteed? Even if we decided to hold
on to Mosul such action would mean a constant menace on the right flank of our whole
position in Mesopotamia and in Bagdad itself.
Then tigain, there is always the possibility in the future of a reorganised army and
an aggressive attitude on the part of Persia, which quite lately during the Khalizi
incident has shown an unwelcome desire to interfere in Irak affairs.
They seem not to have entirely forgotten that it was only some 300 years ago
when the Sultan wrested Bagdad from the Shah, and certainly, if the British left Irak,
these ambitions might revive, and it has even been rumoured that they might trade off
their province of Azerbaijan with the Turks in exchange for permission from them to
reoccupy Bagdad.
In such eventualities, or rather, to prevent their occurring, the strategic position
of Rowanduz is invaluable, as it provides a direct gateway from Mesopotamia into
North-West Persia, through which such actions might be controlled and a too restless
Persia brought to reason. A watch could also be kept on such as that on the frontier
at Bulakbashi further north.
Turning now to the part of the proposed frontier directly north of Mosul, we find
that in the correspondence stating the British objections of the conclusion of the
Franco-Turkish Agreement of the 20 th October, 1921, Lord Curzon, in a letter
to M. de Montille dated the 21 st November, 1921, said; “His Majesty’s Government
cannot remain indifferent to the manifest strategic importance to their position in
“ Irak of the return of the track of the Bagdad Railway to Turkey or of the transfer to
“ that Power of the localities of Jezire-bin-Omar and Nizibin.”
This warning has since been fully justified as the Turks have utilised Jezire as a
military station of importance directly threatening our outpost of Zakho.
Jezire in Roman times was Bezabde, and as the ancient walls still standing testify,
it was a frontier post of considerable importance against Parthia. This is due to its
geographical position at a point of crossing of the Tigris just after the river emerges
from a long series of difficult gorges upstream.
The Turks now seem to wish to emulate the Romans by constituting the place as
a frontier post threatening our position in Mosul, where we may be taken to represent
similar influence to that of Parthia.
The present Turkish garrison in Jezire is stated to be four battalions whose
military headquarters are in Diarbekr with which they are connected by a good road
through Nisibin and Mardin, a route, it may be mentioned, very vulnerable to air
attack. From Jezire northward along the Tigris left bank, is a rough track, but one
which the Turks have utilised for moving troops and even light artillery, up to Sairt
and thence to Bitlis.
By this route connection can be established with troops of the IXth Army Corps
and if necessary reinforcements brought from that force.
This jt may be remarked is the same corps which supplies the detachments in the
Baskala direction.
Also, the narrow defiles on the Tigris and the Bitlis Pass are not entirely immune
from air attack.
As regards the locality of Nisibin, this is clearly an important strategic
concentration point for an advance directed against Mosul, owing to its being the
railhead of the Bagdad Railway and also connected with Diarbekr through Mardin by
a good military road. From Nisibin to Mosid the route lies over open country, open to
air action.
In this connection it may be as well to note the recent attack on the French post
at Armida, between Nisibin and Ras-ul-Ain, when a Kurdish force of 2,000 men, stated
to be led by Turkish regular officers, barbarously murdered the garrison after surrender.
This incident indicates that the Angora Government are not above utilising disaffected
bands of Kurds for their own purposes, and rousing the latent sense of cruelty which
these semi-civilised races possess to serve their own ends.
The fact that machine-guns were supplied to the Kurds and Turkish regular officers
led them, makes the matter rather more serious than ordinary propaganda efforts
among the tribes.
Facing Jezire, at the northernmost corner of our mandate, we are fortunate in
possessing the strong defensive position of Zakho-Feishkhabur, to which I have alluded
in a former memorandum.
This definitely bars an advance from Jezire across the open plain of Nahrwan in
front of it, while the passage of the Khabur at Zakho, and the forcing of the defile of
About this item
- Content
Letters and papers on the frontier between Iraq (also written as Irak in the file) and Turkey, with particular reference to Mosul and questions concerning oil. The file consists mainly of correspondence between Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Curzon, and officials in the Foreign Office, Air Ministry, Colonial Office and Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. [Mustafa İsmet İnönü]. The contents of the file are as follows:
- Sir John Evelyn Shuckburgh to Curzon (15 November 1922). Letter enclosing paper setting out main arguments against evacuating Iraq
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (3 December 1922). Interview with Mukhtar Bey [Mukhtār Beg]; submission of draft telegrams to Foreign Office
- Sir William Tyrrell to Foreign Office (Memo, 3 December 1922, circulated to the Cabinet); interview with Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , 28 November 1922
- Air Staff for Cabinet (5 December 1922). Note: on Sir John Salmond’s proposal for a Forward Policy in the event of Turkish invasion of Iraq or a Resumption of Hostilities with Turkey, 4 December 1922
- Curzon to Foreign Office (6 December 1922). Telegram, 5 December 1922
- Middle East Department (7 December 1922). Note: Mosul – on above telegram
- Foreign Office to Curzon (8 December 1922). Telegram: Mosul
- Curzon to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (14 December 1922). Letter: enclosing Memo on Mosul Vilayet: reasons for refusing Turkish claim
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 December 1922). Curzon for Cabinet. Memo presented to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. on Mosul, 14 December 1922
- Curzon to Cabinet (27 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon enclosing reply to British memo, 23 December 1922
- Curzon for Cabinet (28 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. enclosing counter reply, 26 December 1922
- Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (29 December 1922). Letter with annexed Memo
- Curzon for Cabinet (1 January 1923). Letter Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon
- Sir Percy Cox to Colonial Office (30 December 1922)
- Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame to Sir Sydney Chapman (1 January 1923). Letter: possibility of settlement on basis of oil concessions to Turks and Italians
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (4 January 1923). Memo: conversation with Reader William Bullard and three Turkish experts
- Sir E Crowe to Curzon (3 January 1923). Telegram: from Colonial Office: oil
- Mr Lyndsay to Curzon (4 January 1923). Telegram: paraphrase of Colonial Office telegram to Bagdad [Baghdad], 2 January
- Curzon to Colonial Office (5 January 1923). Telegram: oil
- Sir Ronald William Graham to Curzon (8 January 1923). Letter: (printed for Cabinet) to Curzon: Italian press
- Reader William Bullard to Curzon (9 January 1923). Note: Mosul
- Sir Auckland Geddes (12 January 1923) Telegram: American attitude
- Notes by Curzon (16 January 1923). Handwritten: visit of Aga Petros to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
- Shuckburgh to Forbes Adam (18 January 1923). Letter enclosing draft of telegram to Curzon
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (18 January 1923). Note attaching statement of the history and position with regard to the Mandates in Syria and Iraq and the question of frontiers
- British Case for Northern Frontier of Iraq with Map (19 January 1923). Folder containing notes ‘mostly taken from the memoranda which you (i.e. Curzon) exchanged with Ismet Pasha’ – December 1922
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (20 January 1923). Note: Plebiscite and Mosul
- Forbes Adam for Curzon: ‘Note attaching detailed minute as to the oil in Iraq and the history and present position of the claim of the Turkish Petroleum Company’
- Mr Childs's Statement for the American representatives (23 January 1923)
- Daily Telegraph cutting on League of Nations and Mosul Problem (27 January 1923)
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 January 1923). Speech: reply to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. respecting Mosul, 23 January 1923
- Secretary of State for Colonies to Acting High Commissioner for Iraq (26 January 1923). Paraphrase: telegram: British proposal that question of Northern Frontier of Iraq should be referred to the League of Nations
- High Commissioner, Bagdad to Lord Crew (29 January 1923) Telegram: Enclosing telegram from Iraq Government to Lord Balfour for communication to League of Nations
- Lord Crewe to Curzon (31 January 1923). Telegram: Iraq frontier
- Telegram to Ankara signed by Ismet Hassan [‘Iṣmat Ḥasan] and Rozor Nur [Riḍa Nūr]
- Oil engineering and finance (17 February 1923). Article: The Mesopotamian Oilfields
- The Graphic (17 February 1923). Article: The Mystic City of Mosul
- Colonel Francis Richard Maunsell for Cabinet (24 September 1923). Notes on the Mosul frontier question
- Sir James Edward Masterton-Smith to Foreign Office (3 November 1923). Printed for the information of Curzon, copy of a despatch from the High Commissioner for Iraq, on the subject of the delimitation of the Turco-Irak frontier.
Following documents are undated:
- Lord Balfour to League of Nations. Speech: The frontier between Turkish territory and the territory of Iraq
- The President of the League of Nations. Reply: after Speech by Balfour
- Typewritten report: The question of Mosul
- Typewritten report: The Question of Mosul
The file also includes handwritten notes by Curzon on the Mosul vilayet and groups residing there.
- Extent and format
- 251 folios (1 file)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 251; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [222v] (443/501), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/294, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x00002c> [accessed 14 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x00002c
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x00002c">'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎222v] (443/501)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x00002c"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0451.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/294
- Title
- 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil'
- Pages
- 1r:28v, 28ar:28av, 29r:72v, 91r:167v, 170r:218r, 218r:251v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎222v] (443/501) 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎222v] (443/501)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0451.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)