File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [430r] (864/1150)
The record is made up of 1 volume (573 folios). It was created in 5 Dec 1921-28 Jan 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
( ^f $dr
3
ie y fear
^ed
s>
““feta,
witli aa ^s
0 80 &(k}
?® isl C
0 >t.k
Of the
ne\y e
of view f m
tar as the
; othe “n
whether n
j^rsia or %
o this conn
Pness in ""
stihle ar _
aid tetiw, (1,1,1''
» n tanplataiu
)n ld clearly t *
10 insist consisteiiil
oon^ acquired tj ti |i;
• n o if afrah^lu;
icdiate p
don of i
• n y in ri & ,
were win
if called on to in
possible
rrprises,
n of a railway
es of any soi
V
were
im that your Lordslf
imbining their intei
one which has int®
has been considered!'
iividualsfarmoreif
they may
;ted as secretary'
;ed it in a o
'sia had not gi®
ig up Persia
rlicy
f events since
Iritish goods
it se® s ^ 1 1,, g
sian ^P orts ,, 1
r resp 1
capable oi movements m bulk, if modern methods of agriculture were introduced, a
larger area would be brought under cultivation and an exportable surplus of food
stuffs ought to be available annually for sale m the world market, .and especially in
India. r J
] Many other examples could easily be found, and it is unnecessary to dwell on the
stimulus, both material and moral, which would be given to the life of the country
by the introduction of railways It may safely be assumed that they would be a
powerful factor in increasing the purchasing power of the country and its value as
a market for British goods In this connection it is interesting to note that in the
four years since the row miles of railway in Persian territory between Mirmwa and
Duzdab have been opened to traffic the imports passing annually through Duzdab have
doubled, whereas the exports have actually quintupled. Railways, while stabilising
the economic situation, could also tend automatically to stabilise the political
situation, so long as the railway system was wisely planned and executed.
^ This condition is an important one, however, and necessitates an examination
of the question of alignment. To take the problem as a fresh one, and detached from
the questions involved in existing options or concessions, it seems to me evident that
the general axis of the future Persian railway system ought to be west-east, and not
north-south, and that both for economic and strategic reasons. Broadly speaking,
the Persian trunk line ought to be regarded as a sector of a future trans-continental
South Asiatic railway linking up India with the Eastern Mediterranean, perhaps at
Haifa, and maybe with an alternative route diverging from Bagdad through Con
stantinople to Western Europe. So far as I am able to perceive, this conception is
the most advantageous one in the interest of Great Britain and Persia alike.
Assuming that the line starts from and connects with the Irak railway system on
the Irak-Persian frontier, its proper alignment should be Khanikin-Kermanshah-
Hamadan-Sultanabad-Ispahan-Yezd-Kerman-Duzdab, where it would connect
with the existing Indian system. The Persians would doubtless want the line pro
longed from Hamadan through Noberan to Tehran, and there would be no objection
to this as long as it did not divert the main axis of the future trunk line, to which it
would stand in the position of a branch line to the capital. It would be useful also
to connect the main line with the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
by lines within Persian territory,
e.g., via the Diz Valley with Mohammerah, from Ispahan via Shiraz with Bushire,
and from Kerman to Bunder Abbas.
m The north-south axis is objectionable because at one end it leads to nowhere
except Russia. It has the fallacious appearance of being a sea-to-sea line; fallacious
because the Caspian is a Russian lake and is both physically and politically
inaccessible to the commerce of all nations. The danger to Persia threatens from the
north. A north-south alignment would therefore be a line of dangerous penetration
from the Persian point of view, and a line of dangerous approach, necessitating
counter-measures, or some sort of political control over the southern sector, from the
Indian point of view. It is hardly too much to say that the construction of a north-
south line would make the loss of Persia's independence a mathematical certainty.
The eventuality is therefore one to be avoided to the utmost of our ability.
On the other hand, an east-west trunk line not only provides a harrier to an
advance from the north, but also offers a system of lateral communications which
would render any such advance appreciably more hazardous to undertake and
infinitely more easy to repel. The considerable distance which separates it from
Persia’s northern frontier would constitute another factor of security.
I am mvself strongly in favour of the trunk line being a standard railway; if
the suitability of roadrails for this country be demonstrated, this system could con
veniently be used for the purpose of branch and feeder lines for the time being, at
all events. If, however, the Persians find that they cannot suppoit the nnancial
burden of a standard railway for the moment, and desire to have a loadrails track
built from the western frontier to begin with, I do not think, we should oppose this
scheme, provided the interests of the Persian Railway Syndicate were guaranteed.
This could best be done by their acting as the Persian Government s agents for
building the roadrails track as a forerunner of the standard railway, winch won
obviously require an altogteher different trace from the road followed by the road
rails. I am inclined to think, however, that it would be wisest to use the roadrails
system experimentally in the first place away from the mam western line—for
example, from Bushire to Shiraz, with an extension to Ispahan if the experiment
proved successful—and meanwhile to encourage the Persians to proceed witn the
construction of the standard line from the Irak frontier to Kermanshah at least, and
fi possible to Hamadan.
About this item
- Content
This volume contains papers relating to the construction of the Trans-Persian Railway. It contains material relating to:
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s attempt to enlist the aid of Rabbi Joseph Saul Kornfeld, the United States Envoy to Persia [Iran], and the British Foreign Office’s subsequent unfavourable attitude towards the Syndicate
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s proposal to invite American companies for the construction of railways in Persia
- The concessions for the Mohammerah [Khorramshahr]-Khanakin [Khanaqin] and Khanakin-Tehran railways
- The proposed railway from Khanakin to Tehran and the estimated cost for the three principal divisions of the railway
- The restrictions of the British Government on the Persian Railway Syndicate’s grant of a loan to the Persian Government
- The possibility of a ‘fusion of interests’ between the Persian Railway Syndicate and the Stronach Dutton System of Road Rails Limited
- The possible extension of the American Chester Group’s railway concession from Turkey into Persia
- The plans of the Prime Minister of Persia [Rezā Khān Sardār Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. Sepah] for a railway line extending from Ahwaz [Ahvaz] to Khorramabad, Dizful [Dezful], and Sultanabad [Arak] to Tehran
- The endeavour of an American group to obtain a concession for a line from Mohammerah to Khorramabad and Tehran
- The expenditures of the Persian Railway Syndicate for the Khanakin-Tehran and the Mohamerah-Khoramabad surveys
- The possibility of forming a Railway Syndicate with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and Standard Oil Company
- The Persian Government’s decision to carry out a survey of the Mohammerah-Tehran-Bandar-i Gez [Bandar-i Gaz] railway line with the assistance of a German engineer
- The Consortium industriel pour l’Orient’s proposal to build a railway connecting Meshed [Mashhad] to the Tripoli-Homs Line
- The preference of the British Army Council and the Air Council for an East-West rather than a North-South railway in Persia for strategic reasons
- The exploitation of coal and iron deposits in Mazanderan [Mazandaran] for the construction of railways in Persia, and the concerns of Russia about a Trans-Persian Railway connecting the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. to the Caspian Sea
- The Act of the Persian Majlis [Parliament] for the construction of the Persian Trunk Railway
- The Persian Majlis’s Passage of the Bill for Railway Survey and Construction
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of the Railway Construction Bill, from Mohammerah and Bandar-i Gez to Tehran
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of a law for constructing a railway between Khor Musa-Mohammerah-Bandar-i Gez;
- The Persian Majlis’s authorisation of the Minister of Public Work to employ foreign experts for the construction of the Railway;
- The inauguration of the Bandar-i Gaz-Tehran-Ahwaz Railway in the presence of the Shah of Persia [Rezā Shāh Pahlavi]
- The British concerns and preference for a British rather than an American firm to build the Southern Section of the Railway
- The passage of the Railway Survey Law by the Persian Majlis and the contract between the Persian Government and the American company Ulen, and two German companies, Philipp Holzmann and Julius Berger-Siemens Union [sic., Siemens Bauunion] to carry out a complete survey of the Railway
- The contract between the Persian Government, represented by Minister of Public Works [General Ḥabib Allāh Khān Shaybānī], and the Persian Railway Syndicate, represented by MD Carrel and MNS Mavrogordato
- The contracts between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate for the constructions of ports at Bandar-i Qays and Khor Musa (Bandar-i Shahpur) and a dam over the Karun River at Ahwaz
- The plans for building the line from Bandar Shapur north of Ahwaz, and revival of the line from Hamadan to Tehran
- The construction of the railway lines from Bandar Shah and Khor Musa, the diversion of German resources to the construction of electrical and cement works, and the postponement of building a port at Khor Musa
- The reservations of the British Minister in Persia [Robert Henry Clive] about the construction of the Railway as opposed to motor roads in Persia, and the subsidisation of the enterprise through the tea and sugar monopolies
- The increase in the cost of the Southern Section of the Railway and predicted opposition of the Persian Government
- The visit by the Shah of Persia to the Southern Section of the Railway, his unfavourable impression of the state of the railway, and the American Minister in Persia’s advice to Ulen and Company to stop working on the railway in case of difficulties with the Persian Government
- The cancellation of the contract between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate over delayed payments, and the agreement between the German and Ulen groups within the Syndicate to work on the Northern and Southern sections of the Trans-Persian Railway respectively
- The Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concerns about the Railway providing greater access and mobility to the Russians
- The dispute between the Persian Government and the German-American syndicate for the construction of the Railway
- The negotiations between the Persian Government and the German companies Julius Berger Konsortium, Philipp Holzmann, and Siemens Bauunion for the construction of the Northern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway
- The possible takeover by the Batignolles Construction Company of the building of the Southern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway from the American and British companies Ulen and Company and Stewart and McDonnell
- The Persian Government’s appointment of Suzuki Hajime from the Japanese Railway Department’s Engineering Bureau
- The breakdown of negotiations between the Batignolles Construction Company and the Government of Persia, and the latter’s decision to proceed with the construction of the remaining sections of the railway
- The proposals of the Batignolles Construction Company to the Government of Persia in the absence of a contract
- The extension of the Southern Section of the Railway from Khor Musa to Dizful, Hamadan and Kazvin [Qazvin], and the Northern Section from Tehran to Sari and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.
The volume also includes the following sketch maps:
- A sketch map of the Trans-Persian Railway, from Khor Musa to Sari and the coast of the Caspian Sea, showing the ‘Line Completed’, ‘Line Surveyed’, and ‘Division between the Northern and Southern Sections’ (f 14)
- A sketch map of the Northern Section of the Railway, showing the routes to Pahlavi, Semnan, and Balfurush [Barfurush], with a second map of the Southern Section, showing alternative routes and termini, running either from Mohammerah or Khor Musa to Dizful and Hamadan (f 156)
- A sketch map showing the existing and projected railways in Persia (f 204).
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (573 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 357 (Persia: Railways) consists of two volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/793-794. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: The foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 573; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [430r] (864/1150), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/794, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000041> [accessed 13 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000041
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000041">File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎430r] (864/1150)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000041"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0864.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/794
- Title
- File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:13v, 15r:18v, 19v:23v, 24v:31v, 35v:38v, 39v:42v, 45v:48v, 56v:57v, 58v:62v, 64r:98v, 99v:106v, 110r:117v, 118v:122v, 123v, 125r:126v, 128r:148v, 150v:155v, 157r:163v, 165r:169v, 171r:173v, 175r:181v, 182v:188v, 190r:203v, 205r:206v, 208r:226r, 227v:266v, 268r:489v, 490v, 494v, 498v, 502v, 507v:523v, 524v:526v, 534v:544v, 545v:546v, 547v, 548v:552v, 553v:555v, 557v:572v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎430r] (864/1150) File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎430r] (864/1150)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0864.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)