Skip to item: of 1,150
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎429v] (863/1150)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (573 folios). It was created in 5 Dec 1921-28 Jan 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

nm
already possessing an option for that purpose; if they fear political pen •
through the railway, we are prepared, however unfounded such apprehensi 1 ^ 011
appear to us, to discuss any reasonable means to allay them, e.g., American° nS ^
pation. That to me the benehts of railway construction in Persia are so obvi^^u ”
I am unable to appreciate Persian hesitation to close with so advantageous 10 ^# >^ el
as that of the Persian Railway Syndicate. That financial stringency
ground for their hesitation, but now that there are competent American ad ' li#^ uClC
here, they should be instructed to report on the capacity of the country to pavT !jA ctor 1
railway system. 1 ■' 01 T
. So much for the ground-work of the situation. A new element has arise ,: # silice '
however, which, from a mechanical and technical point of view, might not inmos •KT:a’>ek el
provide a solution of Persia’s railway problem so far as the mere question H ^ ereas
transport and commun^iations is concerned. I refer to the “ roadrails ” system
traction. It is extremely difficult for a layman to say whether roadrails, also knoj®n.s°H
as the Stronach Dutton system, are suitable for use in Persia or would provide wit' ’ '
regularity and efficiency the mechanical haulage which this country requires
first sight the system would seem well suited for the purpose; if this view were con
firmed by competent engineers, its remarkable cheapness in comparison with
standard railway would, in Persian eyes, be an irresistible argument in favour
its employment. There is therefore some possibility of the Persfans wishing 0^00 intrunl
of
iions mvc
jjerd axis 0
taA a
justifiable grounds of economy, to have a roadrails line laid between the Irak frontiyiaticrai
and Tehran in preference to the standard railway contemplated by the Persia: d mavb
Railway Syndicate. If that situation arose, it would clearly be unwise awletoW<
ungracious on the part of His Majesty’s Government to insist consistently with tLudvanti
support which they have hitherto afforded to the option acquired by the Persia:’;y fiat tl
Railway Syndicate on the construction of a standard line if a/rai lroad s line, at onepPersian
tenth or one-eighth of the cost, could.serve Persia’s immediate purposes equally wef dultan
The eventuality would be avoided ifthnre was a fusion of interests between tjiexistiiF
Persian Railway Syndicate and the fRai jhoad s Company in regard to constructi |]( rom ]{ m
work in Persia and if the Persian Railway Syndicate were willing to laytm|oa|p 0Ilff as
instead of a railway 7 on the lines mentioned in the option, if called on to do so by th, ;in( j ^ ^
Persian Government. In this way it seems to me possible to forestall a mo] : . ; r ^ ffi ;
undesirable conflict of interest between two British enterprises, to avoid the questio • ]); z
arising whether the laying of {rail road s is an infraction of a railway option or cor m ]( ermar
cession, and to strengthen considerably the chances of any sort of norfi-so
construction being undertaken by British firms. These were the considerations whilL^q j.
I had in mind when expressing the hope in my telegram that your Lordship q
urge on the two firms in question the desirability of combining their interests. Li^t 0 qj
The question of railway construction in Persia is one which has interested ir u '
for a long time, and although I am aware that it has been considered by If p •
Majesty’s Government and discussed by bodies and individuals far more compete!
than myself, your Lordship will, I trust, permit me to express the personal vief ■, ,
which I have formed on the subject in the hope that they may be of interest an ;!
service. L
'0 During my.earlier residence in Tehran, when I acted as secretary in charge| eil , lia
commercial affairs, I formed the opinion, and expressed it in a confidential trad 0
report in 1908, that the policy of road-making in Persia had not given the resut, , 0In e
expected of it, either from the point of view of opening up Persia or from that er ari
British trade, and that His Majesty’s Government would be well advised to cof
0 WUUia ue wen Ciuvi^u. tw
centrate^theR ^principal energies in the future on a policy of railway construchoj
- JT xxJ uxxv^ 1 Lt U LIX Vy Oil CL pUJL 1C V VJ L X Ctxx vr cvj
I am still of that opinion, and think that the course of events since that date tena .
^ w ^xxxxxxv UXXCXU CXXXy OO UL1 OO OX OVOXXUk? OXXXX/^ - ’
to show that it was a correct one. We wish to sell British goods to Persia.
v/v- v^\_/x x v 7 U v/XXO . T ? VV loll OOll J 1 1 1 ^ 1 olx VlvlVXO •
purchasing power of this country is diminishing, and it seems unlikely that it wi
increase unless means can be found to increase Persian exports. The princips
obstacle to the development of an export trade is that many exportable articles either
cannot reach the sea at all or can do so only at a cost in respect of transport charges
which renders them unsaleable at world prices. Take agriculture as one example
^ , M •’ — exportable surplus
Reused
roa(
Persia in any year.produces with an ordinarily good harvest an expui vau^ r *
of. foodstuffs, notwithstanding the very primitive methods of cultivation which aI J
still employed and notwithstanding the fact that only a proportion of cultivable aI Mv r fiuir
is actually under cultivation. If local shortage or famines occur, it is not because I am
fq CTATl 1 oil o 1 ^ ^ X 1 i 1 e Oil i X _ L 1 J on f 7 T 1 PII 11 S 0 ^ ffipiq
—j xxxxvxwx ^LXXUX vctuxuil. XX 1UU611 bllUJ UP UUAJU1, ^ m xxwvi
a general shortage in the country, but because of the lamentably deficient mean Jpj)eniD e
xi i ol 1m L i i_ i i • , i *i *j • _i lJJ6Iv
# Cl o ^ ux y ? M IX U MX-X Ct LIOVH L LUX' XCLlllxyXX UCX ixx j
distribution and because such means as do exist are prohibitively costly. —> ,
p .I t — __ ni . n 1 1 - rapid transpo 1
fore, distribution were assured by a system of cheaper and more
Nfu
'Loftl

About this item

Content

This volume contains papers relating to the construction of the Trans-Persian Railway. It contains material relating to:

  • The Persian Railway Syndicate’s attempt to enlist the aid of Rabbi Joseph Saul Kornfeld, the United States Envoy to Persia [Iran], and the British Foreign Office’s subsequent unfavourable attitude towards the Syndicate
  • The Persian Railway Syndicate’s proposal to invite American companies for the construction of railways in Persia
  • The concessions for the Mohammerah [Khorramshahr]-Khanakin [Khanaqin] and Khanakin-Tehran railways
  • The proposed railway from Khanakin to Tehran and the estimated cost for the three principal divisions of the railway
  • The restrictions of the British Government on the Persian Railway Syndicate’s grant of a loan to the Persian Government
  • The possibility of a ‘fusion of interests’ between the Persian Railway Syndicate and the Stronach Dutton System of Road Rails Limited
  • The possible extension of the American Chester Group’s railway concession from Turkey into Persia
  • The plans of the Prime Minister of Persia [Rezā Khān Sardār Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. Sepah] for a railway line extending from Ahwaz [Ahvaz] to Khorramabad, Dizful [Dezful], and Sultanabad [Arak] to Tehran
  • The endeavour of an American group to obtain a concession for a line from Mohammerah to Khorramabad and Tehran
  • The expenditures of the Persian Railway Syndicate for the Khanakin-Tehran and the Mohamerah-Khoramabad surveys
  • The possibility of forming a Railway Syndicate with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and Standard Oil Company
  • The Persian Government’s decision to carry out a survey of the Mohammerah-Tehran-Bandar-i Gez [Bandar-i Gaz] railway line with the assistance of a German engineer
  • The Consortium industriel pour l’Orient’s proposal to build a railway connecting Meshed [Mashhad] to the Tripoli-Homs Line
  • The preference of the British Army Council and the Air Council for an East-West rather than a North-South railway in Persia for strategic reasons
  • The exploitation of coal and iron deposits in Mazanderan [Mazandaran] for the construction of railways in Persia, and the concerns of Russia about a Trans-Persian Railway connecting the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. to the Caspian Sea
  • The Act of the Persian Majlis [Parliament] for the construction of the Persian Trunk Railway
  • The Persian Majlis’s Passage of the Bill for Railway Survey and Construction
  • The Persian Majlis’s passage of the Railway Construction Bill, from Mohammerah and Bandar-i Gez to Tehran
  • The Persian Majlis’s passage of a law for constructing a railway between Khor Musa-Mohammerah-Bandar-i Gez;
  • The Persian Majlis’s authorisation of the Minister of Public Work to employ foreign experts for the construction of the Railway;
  • The inauguration of the Bandar-i Gaz-Tehran-Ahwaz Railway in the presence of the Shah of Persia [Rezā Shāh Pahlavi]
  • The British concerns and preference for a British rather than an American firm to build the Southern Section of the Railway
  • The passage of the Railway Survey Law by the Persian Majlis and the contract between the Persian Government and the American company Ulen, and two German companies, Philipp Holzmann and Julius Berger-Siemens Union [sic., Siemens Bauunion] to carry out a complete survey of the Railway
  • The contract between the Persian Government, represented by Minister of Public Works [General Ḥabib Allāh Khān Shaybānī], and the Persian Railway Syndicate, represented by MD Carrel and MNS Mavrogordato
  • The contracts between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate for the constructions of ports at Bandar-i Qays and Khor Musa (Bandar-i Shahpur) and a dam over the Karun River at Ahwaz
  • The plans for building the line from Bandar Shapur north of Ahwaz, and revival of the line from Hamadan to Tehran
  • The construction of the railway lines from Bandar Shah and Khor Musa, the diversion of German resources to the construction of electrical and cement works, and the postponement of building a port at Khor Musa
  • The reservations of the British Minister in Persia [Robert Henry Clive] about the construction of the Railway as opposed to motor roads in Persia, and the subsidisation of the enterprise through the tea and sugar monopolies
  • The increase in the cost of the Southern Section of the Railway and predicted opposition of the Persian Government
  • The visit by the Shah of Persia to the Southern Section of the Railway, his unfavourable impression of the state of the railway, and the American Minister in Persia’s advice to Ulen and Company to stop working on the railway in case of difficulties with the Persian Government
  • The cancellation of the contract between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate over delayed payments, and the agreement between the German and Ulen groups within the Syndicate to work on the Northern and Southern sections of the Trans-Persian Railway respectively
  • The Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concerns about the Railway providing greater access and mobility to the Russians
  • The dispute between the Persian Government and the German-American syndicate for the construction of the Railway
  • The negotiations between the Persian Government and the German companies Julius Berger Konsortium, Philipp Holzmann, and Siemens Bauunion for the construction of the Northern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway
  • The possible takeover by the Batignolles Construction Company of the building of the Southern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway from the American and British companies Ulen and Company and Stewart and McDonnell
  • The Persian Government’s appointment of Suzuki Hajime from the Japanese Railway Department’s Engineering Bureau
  • The breakdown of negotiations between the Batignolles Construction Company and the Government of Persia, and the latter’s decision to proceed with the construction of the remaining sections of the railway
  • The proposals of the Batignolles Construction Company to the Government of Persia in the absence of a contract
  • The extension of the Southern Section of the Railway from Khor Musa to Dizful, Hamadan and Kazvin [Qazvin], and the Northern Section from Tehran to Sari and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.

The volume also includes the following sketch maps:

  • A sketch map of the Trans-Persian Railway, from Khor Musa to Sari and the coast of the Caspian Sea, showing the ‘Line Completed’, ‘Line Surveyed’, and ‘Division between the Northern and Southern Sections’ (f 14)
  • A sketch map of the Northern Section of the Railway, showing the routes to Pahlavi, Semnan, and Balfurush [Barfurush], with a second map of the Southern Section, showing alternative routes and termini, running either from Mohammerah or Khor Musa to Dizful and Hamadan (f 156)
  • A sketch map showing the existing and projected railways in Persia (f 204).
Extent and format
1 volume (573 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 357 (Persia: Railways) consists of two volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/793-794. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: The foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 573; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎429v] (863/1150), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/794, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000040> [accessed 12 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000040">File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [&lrm;429v] (863/1150)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106183.0x000040">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0863.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image