Papers written by Curzon on the Near and Middle East [41r] (81/348)
The record is made up of 1 file (174 folios). It was created in 16 Nov 1917-17 Jan 1924. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
3
with his colleagues, repeated his views of the situation. In this second telegram he had
pointed out that the Oilician incident was a case apart, and ought to be dealt with on
its own merits by itself. What the Allies in Constantinople had to face and to adjust
their action to was the wider issue raised by the intention of the Nationalists to resist
a drastic Peace, and the probable intention of the Peace Conference to impose such a
Peace. He repeated, therefore, the suggestion which had already found place in his
previous telegram that the Allied occupation of Constantinople was the inevitable local
solution.
Upon the receipt of this second telegram, the Allied Conference had again
considered the matter yesterday, and they had despatched a telegram to the Allied
High Commissioners in the following sense :—
1 hey recognised that the “ bloc ” policy was impracticable, since the main condition
ol its adoption, namely the offer to the Turk of a Peace which should leave him the
greater part of his former possessions or power in Europe and Asia Minor was not and
could not be forthcoming. They stated accordingly that, in their opinion, the Capital
ought to be occupied at once by the Allied forces ; that the Turkish Government should
be required to dismiss Mustapha Kemal; that the Turkish Government should be
informed that the military occupation of Constantinople would continue until the
terms of the Peace Treaty had been accepted and put into execution, and lastly that,
if there was any recurrence of outrages, the proposed terms of the Peace Treaty, which
were indicated in outline to the High Commissioners, would be rendered even more
severe, and the concessions already made would be withdrawn.
I explained to the Ambassador that the military occupation of Constantinople
would include the occupation of the Turkish War Office, and the control and censorship
of all military orders or despatches issuing therefrom, with such -other military
measures as might be thought desirable by the Allied commanders, but that it would
not include the general assumption of civil administration in Constantinople.
I he High Commissioners had been asked to consult together at once, both as to
the measures proposed and as to any other steps which, in their judgment, ought to be
taken either to secure the submission of the Turk or to protect the Christian minorities
in the various parts of the Turkish territories from further outrage or attack.
Such, 1 said, was the situation as it existed at this moment, and the reasons for
which, at the instance of the Conference, 1 had thus fully explained the case to the
American Ambassador were these :—
1. So far as Cilicia was concerned, the Americans were directly interested in what
had happened.
2. Although the American Government had desisted from the Peace Conference
and had refrained from giving any indication of their future policy with regard to the
Turkish Empire, there were many who were reluctant to believe that the American
interest in that part of the world had altogether abated, and who even thought that,
at a future date, America might be willing to assume some share of the responsibility,
which at one time it was hoped that she would voluntarily undertake now.
3. The Powers, although they were resolved to take this action by themselves, did
not wish to take it behind the back of the American Government or without at least
informing the American Government of what they were about to do.
It was not for me to formulate to the Ambassador any request, much less any
demand. His Government would decide on their own responsibility what to do
or what not to do. Geographical conditions, might render their participation, even if
they were willing to undertake it, difficult or impossible. But, for our part, we would
gladly welcome their co-operation in a policy which was international in the strictest
sense of the term, and the consequences of which could not fail to have a far-reaching
effect.
In conclusion, I offered to dictate a summary of the statement which I had made
to the Ambassador, which summary, if it were accepted by him, would constitute an
accurate record of what had passed between us, and could be made the basis of the
communication which he informed me that he intended to make
Government.
The present memorandum has been so drawn up and approved.
Foreign Office, March G, 1920.
at once to his.
0. of
About this item
- Content
The file contains correspondence, memoranda, maps, and notes on various subjects connected to the Near and Middle East. The majority of the papers are written by George Curzon himself and concern the settlement of former territories of the Ottoman Empire following its break up after the First World War. Matters such as the Greek occupation of Smyrna, the division of Thrace, the Greco-Turkish War, Georgian independence, and the Treaties of Sèvres and Lausanne are all discussed.
Other matters covered by the file include those concerning the Arab territories of the former Ottoman Empire, American advisers in Persia, and the future of Palestine, including a report by the Committee on Palestine (Colonial Office) dated 27 July 1923 (folios 168-171).
Correspondence within the file is mostly between Curzon and representatives of the other Allied Powers, as well as officials from other governmental departments and diplomatic offices.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (174 folios)
- Arrangement
The file is arranged in chronological order from the front to the back.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 174; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers written by Curzon on the Near and Middle East [41r] (81/348), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/278, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100076917035.0x000052> [accessed 11 January 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100076917035.0x000052
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100076917035.0x000052">Papers written by Curzon on the Near and Middle East [‎41r] (81/348)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100076917035.0x000052"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028c/Mss Eur F112_278_0081.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028c/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/278
- Title
- Papers written by Curzon on the Near and Middle East
- Pages
- 2r:12v, 15r:48v, 54r:93v, 95r:105v, 118r:145r, 147v:153r, 154v, 156r:161v, 163r:173v, back, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence