Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [116v] (232/290)
The record is made up of 1 file (145 folios). It was created in 7 Jan 1919-7 Dec 1920. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
2
to the Bolshevik menace, and, secondly, what steps could be taken
to meet it. He proposed to review the position m the val ^ )US
theatres in turn and to ask the representatives of the India Ottice,
War Office and Admiralty to tell the Conference frankly how they
regarded the situation in each case.
To take Khorassan first. General Malleson was at Meshed with
a force which was not considerable in number somethimr unt ei
^500—but with supports strewn along the eastern frontier
Persia. He was there more as an outpost than as a nuhtaiy
commander. He might be compared to a man on a watch-tower.
It had always been contemplated that if his position were seriously
threatened from a military point of view his force should be
withdrawn. At a recent meeting the Cabinet had taken alarm at
the expenditure involved in our commitments in various theatres
in the Middle East, and had somewhat hastily arrived at certain
decisions, of which one was that General Malleson s force should be
altogether withdrawn. He had pleaded at this meeting that action
should be deferred until the Government of India, who were bearing
a share of the expenditure, could be consulted. The Secretary of
State for India had consulted the Viceroy on the 10th February,
and in his reply of the 21st February Lord Chelmsford had
emphasised the political importance of retaining a British foice in
Khorassan, and had pointed out the grave results that would attend
their proposed withdrawal. At the same time it could not he denied
that the figure of 6| million pounds, which was the estimated
cost of the retention of General Malleson’s force, would be exceed
ingly difficult to justify to the Cabinet. This figure had taken him
completely by surprise, and he could not help wondering whether
it could really be the case that a minimum expenditure of over
6 millions must necessarily be incurred. He would be glad to
know more precisely the exact nature of the charges which made
up this alarming total, and would ask the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
representative
for fuller details. He pointed out that it would not be sufficient to
inform the Cabinet that the Government of India would agree to
pay the “normal proportion” of the*expenditure involved. He
would ask for a definite statement of the actual amount which they
would be prepared to accept. He adhered to the view which he had
. consistently expressed, that the withdrawal of General Malleson’s
force at this juncture would be an act of supreme folly, and he was
prepared to bring great pressure to bear upon the Cabinet to
sanction its retention, provided that he were in a position to give
fuller details of' the expenditure involved, and to say that the
Government of India were sufficiently impressed with the gravity
of the position in Khorassan to bear an equal share with the
Imperial Government in the expenses of General Malleson’s Mission.
Turning now to the south-east corner of. the Caspian, there were
reports that the Bolsheviks were contemplating an advance through
the country of the Yamut Turcomans towards Gumbad Kabus,
with Asterabad as their main objective. One telegram even spoke
obscurel) of their intention of marching across to the Afghan
frontier by a desert route south of Meshed. He could hardly credit
this report, though he fully realised that the Bolsheviks were quite
likely to aim at Asterabad, which was situated on what might be
called the neck of Persia.
Vossugh-ud-Daulah had enquired whether we would advise him
to send a representative to the Bolshevik headquarters at Karasu
or Gumbad Kabus to ask their intentions. His own .inclination
would be to reply at once that there could be no objection. It
seemed to him quite a reasonable course for the Persian Government
to take to send a representative to ask the Bolshevik commander
what was the meaning of this movement. Persia was not at war
with the Soviet Government, and had every right to enquire into
the motives of an apparently hostile force which was violating
Persian territory.
About this item
- Content
This file is composed of papers produced by the Foreign Office's Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs. It consists entirely of printed minutes of meetings of the conference, most of which are chaired by George Curzon.
Those attending include senior representatives of the Foreign Office, the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. (most notably the Secretary of State for India), the War Office, the Admiralty, the Air Ministry, and the Treasury (including the Chancellor of the Exchequer). Other notable figures attending include Harry St John Bridger Philby and Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell.
The meetings concern British policy in the Middle East, and mainly cover the following geographical areas: Mesopotamia, Kurdistan, Trans-Caspia, Trans-Caucasia, the Caspian Sea, Palestine, Persia, Hejaz, and Afghanistan. Some of the meetings also touch on matters beyond the Middle East (e.g. wireless telegraphy in Tibet, ff 79-80).
Recurring topics of discussion include railways (chiefly in relation to Mesopotamia), Bolshevik influence in the Middle East (particularly in Persia and Trans-Caspia), and relations between King Hussein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī] and Ibn Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Fayṣal Āl Sa‘ūd].
Several sets of minutes also contain related memoranda as appendices.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (145 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 145, these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [116v] (232/290), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/275, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000021> [accessed 16 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000021
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000021">Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎116v] (232/290)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000021"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0232.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/275
- Title
- Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:144v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎116v] (232/290) Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎116v] (232/290)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0232.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)