Annotated Copy of Persia and the Persian Question by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [764r] (1544/1814)
The record is made up of 2 volumes with inserts (898 folios). It was created in 1892-1924. It was written in English, Urdu and German. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
xv/AVW LliU 3k
}X
jl)
ll
w.
feu
s
A\
,XS
-T
H
X)
[d
¥
r
o
a
v
! S
X
D
>q
M.
td
W
4
t'— p 00 oo^ 0 ,j eR|4 '4'KIJ'J-jdU'imo am
(V
a
rmtbiiir (ikidte
MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1896 .
i
: J !
o
No one can glance through the Administra
tion Report on the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
and Muscat
for 1894 - 95 , just issued by the Indian Foreign
Office, without endorsing the declaration of
Mr. George Curzon, the Under-Secretary of
State for Foreign Affairs, that the lives and
properties of hundreds of thousands of human
beings are secured by the British Protectorate of
the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
, and that “ were it either with
drawn or destroyed both sea and shores would
relapse into the anarchial chaos from which
they have so laboriously been reclaimed.” The
chief event of the year was the rebellion at
Muscat, which was at its height twelve months
ago. An exhaustive report, sent in to the
Government of India, on the rebellion, its
causes and its probable effects, by the Politi
cal Agent and Consul, does not appear in the
“ selections ” now published. But such of
Major White’s remarks as are made known in
this blue book, throw a very interesting light
upon the savage methods which still find
favour along the Western littoral of the Gulf,
and which apart from British intervention
would reduce that part of Arabia to “ red
ruin and the breaking up of laws.” Even as it
is, our Protectorate, being mainly intended to
safeguard the waters of the Gulf and its ports,
does not move us to keep the interior in order.
To do that a considerable standing army
would be required. The moving spirit in
the late rebellion was Sheik Saleh, who,
although residing in the nominal territo
ries of the Sultan of Muscat, acted quite in
dependently of the authority of our ally in
arbitrating on the inter-tribal disputes which
are an everyday feature of Arabian life. It was
under his influence as was supposed that the
tribes holding the passes into Oman proper
closed them against all caravans in November.
The passes were shortly re-opened, but there
were, about this time, disquieting rumours of
Sheik Saleh’s designs against Muscat, and the
arrival of his son with a considerable following
in the
Wadi
A seasonal or intermittent watercourse, or the valley in which it flows.
Teyeen gave colour to the report.
It was one, however, to which the Sultan ob-
No one can glance through the Administra
tion Report on the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
and Muscat
for 1894-95, just issued by the Indian Foreign
Office, without endorsing the declaration of
Mr. George Curzon, the Under-Secretary of
State for Foreign Affairs, that the lives and
properties of hundreds of thousands of human
beings are secured by the British Protectorate of
the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
, and that “ were it either with
drawn or destroyed both sea and shores would
relapse into the anarchial chaos from which
they have so laboriously been reclaimed.” The
chief event of the year was the rebellion at
Muscat, which was at its height twelve months
ago. An exhaustive report, sent in to the
Government of India, on the rebellion, its
causes and its probable effects, by the Politi
cal Agent and Consul, does not appear in the
“ selections ” now published. But such of
Major White’s remarks as are made known in
this blue book, throw a very interesting light
upon the savage methods which still find
favour along the Western littoral of the Gulf,
and which apart from British intervention
would reduce that part of Arabia to “ red
ruin and the breaking up of laws.” Even as it
is, our Protectorate, being mainly intended to
safeguard the waters of the Gulf and its ports,
does not move us to keep the interior in order.
To do that a considerable standing army
would be required. The moving spirit in
the late rebellion was Sheik Saleh, who,
although residing in the nominal territo
ries of the Sultan of Muscat, acted quite in
dependently of the authority of our ally in
arbitrating on the inter-tribal disputes which
are an everyday feature of Arabian life. It was
under his influence as was supposed that the
tribes holding the passes into Oman proper
closed them against all caravans in November.
The passes were shortly re-opened, but there
were, about this time, disquieting rumours of
Sheik Saleh’s designs against Muscat, and the
arrival of his son with a considerable following 1
in the
Wadi
A seasonal or intermittent watercourse, or the valley in which it flows.
Teyeen gave colour to the report.
It was one, however, to which the Sultan ob
stinately refused to give any credence, more
especially as the passes were re-opened in a
short time. In December some faction quarrels
at Nezwah led to an encounter in which
twenty-five men were killed and fifty wounded,
and Sheik Saleh sent his son to the
town to settle the dispute. Early in
February, two of the Sheik’s concerned in
this sanguinary conflict, proceeded to Muscat
to interview the Sultan on the subject.
They arrived on February the 11th, fol- |
lowed next day by Sheikh Mohsin-bin-Amir A1
Hanthi. The Sultan received them hospitably,
and after long audience dismissed them on the
evening of February 12, with the usual pre
sents. They intimated their intention of leaving
Muscat the same night or early on the follow
ing morning. So far from this being their inten
tion, however, a number of their followers, who
had not been allowed to enter Muscat, made
their way into the town after nightfall, in par
ties of two and three. This excited the suspi
cion of the Wahabi soldiers of the Sultan, who
hastened to inform him of their fears.
The Muscat Ruler entirely disregarded the
warning, as he refused to believe that so long
as the Chiefs and their followers were in the
town as his guests, they could be guilty of so
grave a breach of the rules of Arab hospitality
as to take advantage of their position to attack
their host. But this charitable belief was not
justified, for at daybreak on the following morn
ing his palace was suddenly attacked and the re
bels having overpowered the few guards on duty,
proceeded in the direction of the Sultan’s sleep
ing apartments with the intention to take his
life. His Highness supported by a few followers,
offered a most determined resistance, and kept
his assailants at bay for some time. But he was
ultimately compelled to take refuge with his
family and adherents in Fort Jellali, while his
brother Seyed Muhamed-bin-Toorke found
similar refuge in Fort Merani. Major Sadler on
hearing of this serious state of affairs took
such steps as were possible to protect British
life and property and addressed a letter
to Sheikh Abdullah, the rebel leader, in
timating that he would be held responsible
for any injury the British might suffer
at the hands of his followers. Supported
by a vigorous cannonade, and rifle fire from
Fort Jellali, the Sultan made a determined
attempt to recover possession of the palace.
The effort did not succeed, and, as neither
party were in sufficient force to take the ag- j
gressive, a lull in the fighting ensued. The I
rebels were masters of the greater part of the
town, but they contented themselves with
taking up as strong a defensive position as
possible, and quietly awaiting the arrival of
reinforcements. The inhabitants of the town,
British or Arab, were not, as a rule, interfered
with or molested. The rebel leaders publicly
proclaimed that the sole object of their action
was to dethrone Seyyid Feysal, who, by his
weak rule, had shown himself unfit to govern
Oman, and to replace him by a Sultan whose
power would make itself felt throughout the
country. It was further announced that the
force of rebels in the town was but the advance
guard of a much larger force which under the
command of Sheik Saleh was advancing on
Muscat, and was hourly expected to arrive.
However, the advance of the Umra Khan
of Oman was forestalled by the arrival of
H. M. S. Sphinx, followed shortly afterwards
by the Lawrence and the Bramble. With this
display of force in the harbour at his back the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
demanded a truce between the
belligerents, and advantage was taken of it to
remove the British residents from the town. The
British Agent did not otherwise interfere, and
a desultory warfare extending over some three
weeks ensued. The Sultan’s followers having
been largely re-inforced far outnumbered the
rebels, but made no determined effort to expel
them and recover the capital. The Sultan des
pairing of success by the
agency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent.
of war, had
recourse to other means—he opened negotia
tions with Sheikh Saleh, and as a result the
town was evacuated by the rebels, who received
some thousands of
rupees
Indian silver coin also widely used in the Persian Gulf.
as the price of their
retirement. Although the loyalty thus pur
chased seems so far to have been preserved
without serious rupture, it can scarcely be re
garded as very stable. But doubtless the
gates of Muscat are more carefully guarded
now against the entry of armed men in small
bands.
The selections published form an almost
continuous record of quarrels between Arab
chiefs, of robberies, conspiracies and mur
ders, but through them all British and other
foreign residents are enabled to pursue un
molested their callings. They are not so suc
cessful, however, in escaping unjust extortions
from the Arab rulers in regard to their com
merce. As an instance, the experience of Bri
tish Indian exporters of dates from Katifin
Bahrein to India may be cited. Complaints
were made in 1893 that Rs. 5,615 had been
exacted over the treaty rate of 1 per cent., and
after a very long delay, the explanation was
given by the Turkish authorities at Baghdad,
that their customs system required the deposit
of 7 per cent, over the treaty rate—such excess
to be refunded on the production of certifica
tes by the Turkish Consul in India, of the due
arrival of consignments there. Meantime
shipments for 1893 had been made on an
excess payment of Rs. 9,719, and certificates
in both these cases could not be produced,
owing to the delay in intimating the necessity
for such certificates. Excess duty to the
extent of Rs. 4,174 was again exacted in 1894,
and the certificates insisted upon being in this
case produced, a fresh excuse for maintaining
the extortion was found in a demand for the
receipts for the amounts originally paid. As
receipts had been consistently refused, the
device enabled the customs people to resist
refunds of their unjust exactions, which, in all
amounted to Rs. 19,500. The principal
difficulty exporters had to contend with,
however, was not customs exactions, but
the low exchange value and fluctuation of
the silver krau, the standard coin of the
country. At the commencement of the year
its value was 45j to the pound sterling, but
before the year closed it had reached 57
to the pound sterling. Another difficulty with
which traders were confronted was the abnormal
use in the rate of transport between Bushire and
Shiraz, until it reached 195 krans per 100
mans for piece-goods and 200 for loaf-sugar
and case goods. This price—brought about
mainly by a severe epidemic among transport
animals—has never been touched before, and
naturally it tended to paralyse trade between
Bushire and the north. But in spite of draw
backs such as these, commerce throughout
the consular district of Bushire showed
welcome signs of reaction from the depression
under which it had has previously laboured.
At the three ports of Bushire, Bunder Abbas
and Lingah, the value of imports increased by
over sixty-two
lakhs
One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees
, and that of exports by
over 20j
lakhs
One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees
.
About this item
- Content
These two volumes are George Curzon's own personal annotated copies of both volumes of his book Persia and the Persian Question , which was published in 1892. Alongside the volumes are various loose papers relating to Persia [Iran], consisting of the following: received correspondence; newspaper cuttings; publishers' press releases; cuttings from various booksellers' catalogues; various journal and magazine articles; two items of printed official British correspondence; several prints of photographs and sketches; and a few handwritten notes by Curzon.
In most cases these papers, which range in date from 1892 to 1924, relate to the chapters in the book where they were originally inserted, suggesting that they were kept by Curzon with the intention of using them to inform a revised edition of the book.
Of particular note among the small amount of correspondence are two letters received by Curzon in 1914 and 1915 from retired schoolmaster and Islamic scholar Sayyid Mazhar Hasan Musawi of Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India (ff 5-9 and ff 44-53). These letters, which are written in Urdu and are accompanied by English translations, discuss in detail several inaccuracies found in the Urdu version of Persia and the Persian Question .
The various prints of photographs and sketches, which were originally inserted into volume two, are of different locations in the Gulf region. Several of these appear to have been produced in preparation for the publication of the second volume of John Gordon Lorimer's Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Oman and Central Arabia (i.e. the 'Geographical and Statistical' section) in 1908, as they are identical to the versions found in that volume.
Also of note among the loose papers are an illustrated article from Country Life dated 5 June 1920, entitled 'The People of Persia' (ff 36-37), and a printed family tree of the Shah of Persia [Aḥmad Shah Qājār], produced in preparation of his visit to Britain in 1919 (f 233).
Volume one of Persia and the Persian Question contains a map of Persia, Afghanistan and Beluchistan [Balochistan], which is folded inside the front cover (f 1).
The German language material consists of a publisher's press release for two books authored by German archaeologist Ernst Emil Herzfeld (ff 29-30).
- Extent and format
- 2 volumes with inserts (898 folios)
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: this shelfmark consists of two physical volumes. The foliation sequence commences at the first folio of volume one (1-463), and terminates at the last folio of volume two (ff 464-898); these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Each volume contains a large number of loose leaves, which have been foliated in the order that they were inserted into the volume; for conservation reasons, these loose folios have been removed from the volume and stored separately. The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers of the two volumes.
Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.
- Written in
- English, Urdu and German in Latin and Arabic script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Annotated Copy of Persia and the Persian Question by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [764r] (1544/1814), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F111/33, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100157213849.0x000091> [accessed 26 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100157213849.0x000091
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100157213849.0x000091">Annotated Copy of <em>Persia and the Persian Question</em> by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [‎764r] (1544/1814)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100157213849.0x000091"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00033b/Mss Eur F111_33_1563.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00033b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F111/33
- Title
- Annotated Copy of Persia and the Persian Questionby George Curzon, with Inserted Papers
- Pages
- 764r:764v
- Author
- Bombay Gazette
- Usage terms
- Public Domain
![Annotated Copy of <em>Persia and the Persian Question</em> by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [‎764r] (1544/1814) Annotated Copy of <em>Persia and the Persian Question</em> by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [‎764r] (1544/1814)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00033b/Mss Eur F111_33_1563.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)