Annotated Copy of Persia and the Persian Question by George Curzon, with Inserted Papers [‎83r] (172/1814)

WAYS AN]) MEANS
33
•4
ti'av e ]j
Persian. ' eV(i| >
with co,/" 6 '
:ler a
ler
Puts
ivenieii Ceg
u Pfo,
> sucl
Us nalt 0
' s ? it is
in g, a
r °m two to f 0 ;
re( i ) except {„
nee t t}l is outla,
be procured i»
sent clown f m]
ln ba gs in %
a lon g journey,
tlier method o[
ary instructions
learnt thatfc
Ln y rate cheap,
Lclum) make tis
zlaereh or postal
oon as possitle,
rter to take up
ell as a Russian
being for some
inmate* so that
the majesty of
elieran may fe
belt extending
i portion of the
coast-line from
distance oflM
mrz Mountains)
altitude of over
u or plain upon
they can
they are
only ke
accept
their southern side, descending from Kazvin to Teheran. Between
Resht and Kazvin the stages are as follows : 1
Name of station
Distance in Farsakhs
Approximate distance
in Miles
Resht to Kuhdum ....
6
16
Kuhdum to Rustamabad .
5
18J
Rustamabad to Menjil
5
17|
Menjil to Paichenar ....
5
13
Paichenar to Mazreh
5
20
Mazreh to Kazvin ....
5
21
Total .
31 2
106
After leaving Resht the road strikes inland through the first or
woodland belt, traversing a forest, which, while it reeks with
Resht to miasma, also abounds in game. Here are to be found
Kazvin not only the humble fauna with which we are familiar in
England, such as hares, foxes, pheasants, and the like, but wolves,
hyenas, jackals, leopards, tigers, lynxes, and wild hoar. Generally
1 The following modern writers have given descriptions of the journey from
Enzeli to Teheran: E. B. Eastwick (1860-61), Journal of a Diplomat vol. i. pp.
293-end ; vol. ii. pp. 1-14. Col. Yal. Baker (1873), Cloudsin the East, pp. 312-317.
A. Arnold (1875) Through Persia by Caravan, vol. i. caps, viii.-x. A. H. Schindler,
, (1877), Zeit. d. Gesell. fur Erd. z. Berlin, vol. xiv. Sir C. MacGregor (1878),
Journey through Khorasan, vol. ii. pp. 176-180. E. O’Donovan (1880), The Mere
Oasis, vol. i. pp. 307-337. E. Orsolle (1882), Le Cauease et la Perse, caps, xi.-xv.
2 The total of farsahhs if multiplied by four seldom corresponds to the actual
number of miles, for the reason that, the farsahh being the unit of measurement,
no fraction of a farsakh is taken into account. Thus 12f miles will count as
4 farsahhs equally with 16 miles, and be paid for accordingly. Moreover, the
length of the farsahh differs in different parts of the country accordicg to the
nature of the ground, the local interpretation of the term being the distance
which a laden mule will walk in the hour. Thus in mountainous country the
farsahh will be apt not greatly to exceed three miles; whilst on level ground four
miles may sometimes be an inadequate measurement. The name farsahh is, as
well known, the Arabicised form of the old Persian parasang (transcribed by the
Greeks as Trapaadyyry;), and is supposed to be derived from pieces of stone (sang)
placed on the roadside as marks at fixed distances apart. In one of the books
of the Zend Avesta there is the following not too precise definition of the term :
‘ A farsahh is the distance at which a long-sighted man can see a camel and dis
cern whether it be white or black.’ In Luristan, on the other hand, the standard
is sound, not sight, a farsahh being the distance at which a drum beat can be
heard. As a matter of fact, the originalpa?'asang was an old Babylonian measure,
based on the Babylonian cubit, and was equal to 3-523 miles. But the modern
parasang varies in proportion as the modern cubit varies; its mean value being
3-915 miles, which corresponds with the Royal Babylonian cubit. Vide ‘ Notes
on the Length of the Farsahh,' by Gen. A. H. Schindler, in Proceedings of the
It. G. S. (new series), vol. x. pp. 584-588 (1888).
VOL. I.
D