Skip to item: of 254
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

‘WAR DIARY. ARMY HEADQUARTERS, INDIA. […] I.E.F. “D”. Volume 55. PART II. (From 16th to 28th February 1919.)’ [‎46r] (100/254)

The record is made up of 1 volume (123 folios). It was created in 11 Jan 1919-28 Feb 1919. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

46
The notables of Bahdad were asked on January 9th for their views on the
three points mentioned in your telegram of November 28th (Diary No. 96400).
Letters were written to the Naq'b and to the Shiah Qadhi, and to the
heads of the Jewish and Christian community askng them to nominate respec
tively 25 Sunni, 25 Shiah, 20 Jewish and 10 Christian delegates.
The Naqib refused to act and the Sunni Qadhi with the former’s consent
undertook the work.
Each delegate was provided with the Arabic text of the i^nglo-Erench
declaration of November 8th and a statement sho ving the opinions elicited up
to date from other parts of Mesopotamia.
Both the Qadhis called meetings of their communities at which extremely
inflammatory language was used and the delegates selected were bound down
beforehand to ask for an Arab Government without European protection.
The full power of religious fanaticism was brought to hear and those who
attempted to protest were threatened with religious and social ostracism.
Of the 50 delegates selected at preliminary meetings 6 of the two Muham
madan communities seven backed out at the la^t ngoment and refused to attend.
These seven men represent a very large proportion o*f toe property owned by
the 50 delegates. Most of them want British rule pure and simple; all desire a
continuance of effective British control, hut were not prepared to face the
religious oblequy involved by a public declaration of their wishes.
Other Muhammadan notables very representative in their own spheres,
have from the beginning declined to take part in these proceedings ; no member
of the Naqib’s family was present.
The Naqib in conversation with Lieutenant-Colonel Balfour, Military
Governor, held that the country was far from ready for any Amir, and advoca
ted a British administration which would co-operate with natives of the country
and employ them in gradually increasing measure.
He began and ended by expressing surprise and regret that we bad made
any attempt to consult native opinion at all. Several other notables, religious,
and secular, evidently wishing to excuse their own conduct, have been at pains
to explain that when a Moslem is asked what form of Government be requires
he is enjoined by his faith to reply in favour of Moslem rule.
The Muhamadan delegates finally put forward a document asking for a
single Arab State from Mosul to the Gulf under a son of the Sheriff with no
mention of foreign pretection. Some of the signatories were formerly strong
adherents of the C. U. P.
The views of the Jews and Christians who form nearly one half of the
community and comprise the vast majority of the important traders, may be
summarized by saying that they look forward to anything except British rule
without an Amir with the greatest alarm.
They are far ahead of the bulk of the Moslems in education and political
knowledge and their wishes cannot hut he given the fullest consideration.
Since the result of the Mohamadan meetings referred to above has become
known there has been a definite revulsion of feeling in Baghdad and a
document is v ow being circulated amongst the leading notables, including
those who have hitherto abstained from taking any part in the matter, asking
for British protection without an Amir.
Khadhimani.—Wiz Ulama hacked by agents from Constantinople, definitely
threatened with ex-communication any one who voted for British control.
In spite of this the head of the municipality and the only other big
merchant in the town have prepared a document demanding the continuance
of British rule which is being extensively signed by tribal Shaikhs and the
mass of British Indian subjects in Kadhimain.
Working copy to G. S. (M. O -1).
Copy to G. S. (M. 0.-3).
APPENDIX 309.
DIARY No. 13702.
Telegram P., No. 13702 (A. G.-l), dated 21st February 1919.
(Despatched 6-15 p. m.)
—The Chief of the General Staff, Delhi,
To—The General Officer Commanding, Baghdad.
(Bepeated Deputy Adjutant-General, 3rd Echelon Force “ D,” and Secretary, War Office
London, reference his 75100 (A. G.- 6 ), dated February 8 th (Diary No. 10509).)
Reference your No. X.-5375 (Diary No. 12061), dated 14th Eebruary
1919.
“S ” Battery, R. H. A., should not he sent to India, in the circumstances
Record copy to A. G.
Copy to M. S. C., Q. M. G., G. S. (S. D.-l, S. D.-3).
26
|j27

About this item

Content

The volume contains a chronological list of brief summaries of papers relating to the activities of the Indian Expeditionary Force D (also known as the Mesopotamia Expeditionary Force) between 16 and 28 February 1919. This is accompanied by appendices containing copies and extracts of these papers, which include: telegrams, memoranda, tables, and letters.

An index to the contents of this volume can be found at the start of IOR/L/MIL/17/5/3317. The volume concerns:

  • Military personnel issues, including the granting of leave, promotions, nominations for Staff Officer positions, and conditions for garrison units
  • Supply of food, artillery, construction materials, and other items to Force D
  • Reductions of planned supply shipments to Force D
  • Matters relating to the demobilisation of Force D, including: shipment of troops from Mesopotamia to India and the United Kingdom; provision of civilian clothing for demobilised troops; and the disposal of surplus stores and motor vehicles
  • Repatriation of non-Turkish prisoners of war
  • Nomination of Indian officers for honorary ranks in the British Indian Army
  • Discussion of conflict between Bin Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Āl Sa‘ūd] and King Hussein [Al-Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī]
  • Discussion of coordination of British policy in Mesopotamia, South Persia [Iran] and Maskat [Muscat]
  • Arrangements for financing the army of occupation in post-war Mesopotamia
  • Discussion of future political system of Mesopotamia, including need to ‘prevent Arab nationalism from being drawn into opposition to British control’
  • Construction of railways in Mesopotamia
  • British assessments of Mesopotamian public opinion
  • Appointment of a Commercial Secretary in Mesopotamia
  • Testing and disposal of malfunctioning ammunition
  • Reports of ‘dissatisfaction’ among soldiers in Force D regarding pace of demobilisation
  • Withdrawal of British forces from Trans-Caspia [Turkmenistan] to Meshed [Mashhad]
  • British occupation of Krasnovodsk [Turkmenbashi]
  • Arming of ‘friendly Turcomans’ in Trans-Caspia
  • Dispatch of naval vessels from India for service in northern Russia
  • Construction and maintenance of roads in Persia
  • Supplying of captured Turkish [Ottoman] ordnance to the Persian Government
  • Tensions between the Persian Government and the Jangali [Jangalī] Movement.

The volume also contains:

  • Strength return of Force D on 11 January 1919 (f 23)
  • Ration strength of Force D on 11 January 1919 (ff 109-114), 25 January 1919 (ff 32-35), February 1 1919 (ff 106-109)
  • Programme for March despatch of British troops from Mesopotamia (f 48)
  • Distribution and composition of Force D, including details of lines of communication, general organisation, and post-war garrison units (ff 53-62)
  • State of supplies on 17 February 1919 (ff 64-65)
  • Firing test results and summary for 18-pounder shrapnel ammunition (ff 90-97)
  • Weekly return of sick and wounded dated 18 January 1919 (ff 98-99).
Extent and format
1 volume (123 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 121; these numbers are printed, and are located in the bottom centre of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the leading and ending flyleaves.

Dimensions: 21 x 33cm

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

‘WAR DIARY. ARMY HEADQUARTERS, INDIA. […] I.E.F. “D”. Volume 55. PART II. (From 16th to 28th February 1919.)’ [‎46r] (100/254), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/MIL/17/5/3318, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100141313468.0x000065> [accessed 31 March 2025]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100141313468.0x000065">‘WAR DIARY. ARMY HEADQUARTERS, INDIA. […] I.E.F. “D”. Volume 55. PART II. (From 16th to 28th February 1919.)’ [&lrm;46r] (100/254)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100141313468.0x000065">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000112.0x00022c/IOR_L_MIL_17_5_3318_0100.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000112.0x00022c/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image