'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [219r] (436/501)
The record is made up of 251 folios (1 file). It was created in 15 Nov 1922-3 Nov 1923. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty’s Government.]
\
TURKEY:
No. 1.—SECRETARY OF STATE.
[Septem
CONFIDENTIAL.
Section 3.
fE 10449/1019/65] No. 1. .. /
rl
Notes on the Mosul Frontier Question by Colonel F. R. Maunsell, O.M.G.* C.BMt-
(Communicated by War Office, September 22; Received m Foreign‘Office,
September 24.)
UNDER the Treaty of Lausanne the next question for consideration is that of
Mosul or rather the northern frontier of our Mesopotamian mandate. After the
Mudros armistice it was finally decided to accept as the provisional frontier the
boundary of the Mosul Vilayet as it existed in Turkish times, tor most of the line this
meant takina the boundary of the Vilayets of Van and Mosul as far as could be
determined from the maps then available. As a former consul at Van, i can,
perhaps, claim some knowledge of the situation as it was regarded in van before
the war^ Government> \\^ e other Oriental States, never seem to care to have
their frontiers laid down too definitely on accurate maps ; probably they like to have
some deviations they may manage to include in subsequent quarrels or negotiations.
Even the vilayet boundaries of the interior were in many cases not too clearly laid
down, but were generally recognised by the gendarmerie of vilayets, by local custom
following some well-marked geographical feature in man\ cases.
In the Kurdish vilayets the Turkish Government purposely drew the vilayet
boundaries to suit political considerations, to divide up some unruly Kurdish
tribal confederation so that it fell under two separate vilayet Governments, thus
frustrating possible combination and rendering the tribes easier to manage as a
Wh0l This was specially noticeable among the large Kurdish confederations on the
plateau north of Lake Van, Erzerum and Bitlis. Now, for reasons that will he shown
later, the boundary of the Vilayets of Van and Mosul remained the most indeterminate
of, perhaps, all the other Turkish provinces. , . . „ . , v
Other boundaries of the Van Vilayet, such as that with Erzerum on the north
and Bitlis on the west, were comparatively clearly defined by geographical features,
and because these districts round Lake Van were under fairly good administrative
control the boundaries were generally recognised It was otherwme with tbe
boundaries of the Mosul and Bitlis Vilayets south of the lake. The Turkisli Govern
ment published no map showing the official divrsions of their country, and the best
semi-official map was, and I believe still remains, Huber s Carte administrative de
1’Empire ottoman.” which gave the vilayets, sanjaks and nalnes with considerab e
accuracy in Eastern Turkey, and although the scale was very small, and the map
difficult sometimes to reconcile with the ground, yet a good general idea of the
administrative divisions was produced. . ^ n
There were also vilayet administrative maps in the various volumes of Cmnet s
“ Gazetteer,” but these were also of small scale, roughly drawn, and still more difficult
to re ^d production just before the war of the Turkish staff map of North-Eastern
Turkey in Asiaf the country remained officially unsurveyed but I found that the \ ahs
generally had manuscript maps of their vilayets on a small scale hanging up m len
offices marking roughlv the boundaries of their vilayets. _ I never obtained access to
that of the Van Vilayet, and those of the Sivas and Trebizond Vilayets, which I saw,
were very rough productions. i tj
The Turkish staff map of Eastern Turkey seemed to have been made for military
purposes, and 1 have never seen any vilayet boundaries marked on it. In the
discussion of the Mosul frontier question it is, however, quite possible that lhe Angora
Government will produce maps with frontiers and boundaries drawn to suit their
political claims, utilising their staff map as far as it applies ; and probably copies o my
1414 aa—31
These frequently altered in Eastern Turkey.
About this item
- Content
Letters and papers on the frontier between Iraq (also written as Irak in the file) and Turkey, with particular reference to Mosul and questions concerning oil. The file consists mainly of correspondence between Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Curzon, and officials in the Foreign Office, Air Ministry, Colonial Office and Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. [Mustafa İsmet İnönü]. The contents of the file are as follows:
- Sir John Evelyn Shuckburgh to Curzon (15 November 1922). Letter enclosing paper setting out main arguments against evacuating Iraq
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (3 December 1922). Interview with Mukhtar Bey [Mukhtār Beg]; submission of draft telegrams to Foreign Office
- Sir William Tyrrell to Foreign Office (Memo, 3 December 1922, circulated to the Cabinet); interview with Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , 28 November 1922
- Air Staff for Cabinet (5 December 1922). Note: on Sir John Salmond’s proposal for a Forward Policy in the event of Turkish invasion of Iraq or a Resumption of Hostilities with Turkey, 4 December 1922
- Curzon to Foreign Office (6 December 1922). Telegram, 5 December 1922
- Middle East Department (7 December 1922). Note: Mosul – on above telegram
- Foreign Office to Curzon (8 December 1922). Telegram: Mosul
- Curzon to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (14 December 1922). Letter: enclosing Memo on Mosul Vilayet: reasons for refusing Turkish claim
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 December 1922). Curzon for Cabinet. Memo presented to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. on Mosul, 14 December 1922
- Curzon to Cabinet (27 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon enclosing reply to British memo, 23 December 1922
- Curzon for Cabinet (28 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. enclosing counter reply, 26 December 1922
- Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (29 December 1922). Letter with annexed Memo
- Curzon for Cabinet (1 January 1923). Letter Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon
- Sir Percy Cox to Colonial Office (30 December 1922)
- Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame to Sir Sydney Chapman (1 January 1923). Letter: possibility of settlement on basis of oil concessions to Turks and Italians
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (4 January 1923). Memo: conversation with Reader William Bullard and three Turkish experts
- Sir E Crowe to Curzon (3 January 1923). Telegram: from Colonial Office: oil
- Mr Lyndsay to Curzon (4 January 1923). Telegram: paraphrase of Colonial Office telegram to Bagdad [Baghdad], 2 January
- Curzon to Colonial Office (5 January 1923). Telegram: oil
- Sir Ronald William Graham to Curzon (8 January 1923). Letter: (printed for Cabinet) to Curzon: Italian press
- Reader William Bullard to Curzon (9 January 1923). Note: Mosul
- Sir Auckland Geddes (12 January 1923) Telegram: American attitude
- Notes by Curzon (16 January 1923). Handwritten: visit of Aga Petros to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
- Shuckburgh to Forbes Adam (18 January 1923). Letter enclosing draft of telegram to Curzon
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (18 January 1923). Note attaching statement of the history and position with regard to the Mandates in Syria and Iraq and the question of frontiers
- British Case for Northern Frontier of Iraq with Map (19 January 1923). Folder containing notes ‘mostly taken from the memoranda which you (i.e. Curzon) exchanged with Ismet Pasha’ – December 1922
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (20 January 1923). Note: Plebiscite and Mosul
- Forbes Adam for Curzon: ‘Note attaching detailed minute as to the oil in Iraq and the history and present position of the claim of the Turkish Petroleum Company’
- Mr Childs's Statement for the American representatives (23 January 1923)
- Daily Telegraph cutting on League of Nations and Mosul Problem (27 January 1923)
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 January 1923). Speech: reply to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. respecting Mosul, 23 January 1923
- Secretary of State for Colonies to Acting High Commissioner for Iraq (26 January 1923). Paraphrase: telegram: British proposal that question of Northern Frontier of Iraq should be referred to the League of Nations
- High Commissioner, Bagdad to Lord Crew (29 January 1923) Telegram: Enclosing telegram from Iraq Government to Lord Balfour for communication to League of Nations
- Lord Crewe to Curzon (31 January 1923). Telegram: Iraq frontier
- Telegram to Ankara signed by Ismet Hassan [‘Iṣmat Ḥasan] and Rozor Nur [Riḍa Nūr]
- Oil engineering and finance (17 February 1923). Article: The Mesopotamian Oilfields
- The Graphic (17 February 1923). Article: The Mystic City of Mosul
- Colonel Francis Richard Maunsell for Cabinet (24 September 1923). Notes on the Mosul frontier question
- Sir James Edward Masterton-Smith to Foreign Office (3 November 1923). Printed for the information of Curzon, copy of a despatch from the High Commissioner for Iraq, on the subject of the delimitation of the Turco-Irak frontier.
Following documents are undated:
- Lord Balfour to League of Nations. Speech: The frontier between Turkish territory and the territory of Iraq
- The President of the League of Nations. Reply: after Speech by Balfour
- Typewritten report: The question of Mosul
- Typewritten report: The Question of Mosul
The file also includes handwritten notes by Curzon on the Mosul vilayet and groups residing there.
- Extent and format
- 251 folios (1 file)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 251; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [219r] (436/501), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/294, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000025> [accessed 5 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000025
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000025">'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎219r] (436/501)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000025"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0444.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/294
- Title
- 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil'
- Pages
- 1r:28v, 28ar:28av, 29r:72v, 91r:167v, 170r:218r, 218r:251v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎219r] (436/501) 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎219r] (436/501)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0444.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)