'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [213v] (424/501)
The record is made up of 251 folios (1 file). It was created in 15 Nov 1922-3 Nov 1923. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
198
February 17, 1923.
OIL ENGINEERING AND FINANCE
which we understand is the literal translation from
the Turkish.
Private Not Crown Property.
We have observed in the official correspondence
between Lord Curzon and the United States Ambas
sador on the subject of Economic Rights in Mandated
Territories, published in the White Paper of 1921, Mis
cellaneous No. 10, that the Concessions above discussed
are precisely those claimed by the Turkish Petroleum
Company, a claim evidently strongly objected to by
the State Department at Washington. In his last des
patch to the U.S. Ambassador, on February 28th,
1921, Lord Curzon refers to these concessions as “ per
fectly valid and already existing concessions.” In
Article 240 of the Treaty of Sevres, it states that all
Civil List property shall, without compensation, be
come the property of successive States. It is logical,
therefore, to assume that Mesopotamian oil areas have
been accepted, at any rate by the Foreign Office, as
private property and not as Crown property. We are
confirmed in this opinion by a number of facts, of
which we will mention two, which have no doubt in
fluenced British authorities in coming to the above
conclusion.
First, under the Turkish Mining Laws in force
when these concessions were granted, all
minerals, including petroleum, were the pro
perty of the Crown as head of the State ; it
cannot therefore be supposed that the promul
gation of a special
Firman
A Persian word meaning a royal order or decree issued by a sovereign, used notably in the Ottoman Empire (sometimes written ‘phirmaund’).
of Concession was
necessary to confirm the Crown in the posses
sion of property which it already owned. The
essential point is that Crown properties are
not to be regarded as distinct from State pro
perties in a regime of absolute monarchy.
Sultan Abdul Hafmid represented the State,
and all mineral rights were granted by him as
monarch to individuals. This is established
by the form of the Concessions which are Im
perial Firmans issued by the Sultan, and not
by or on behalf of the Turkish Government.
The granting of a Concession is, therefore,
essentially the alienation of a right inherent
in the Crown, ,and when a Concession is
granted to the person of the reigning Sultan,
this can only be as an individual, for other
wise the act would be ipso facto nugatory.
MOUSSUL CONCESSION, 1888.
OFFICIAL TRANSLATION.
Sublime PorIe
Grand Vezirat
Imperial Chancery.
Imperial
Firman
A Persian word meaning a royal order or decree issued by a sovereign, used notably in the Ottoman Empire (sometimes written ‘phirmaund’).
oe Concession.
To My Illustrious Minister of Finance and of My
Imperial Private Treasury Agop
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
, decorated with My
Orders in brilliants of Osmanieh and Medjidieh.
You have submitted for My Imperial sanction the pro
posal to grant exclusivelv to My Private Treasury the Con-
for the research and exploitation of petroleum
Second, by law and tradition Crown properties
of the Ottoman Empire are not subject to
taxes, tithes, or Government duties, and they
are immune from legal action of any kind.
Properties administered by the Privy Purse
or Civil List are subject to taxation and legal
action in exactly the same manner as pro
perties owned by ordinary Turkish subjects.
The cost of the up-keep and care of Crown
properties, and the payment of employees en
gaged on them, is defrayed directly by the
Ministry of Finance, while properties of the
Civil List are repaired and employees are paid
from the Revenues of the Civil List Adminis
tration. This distinction was proved in fact
by the action brought against Sultan Abdul
Hamid personally by Taksin
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
in the
Civil Courts of Turkey in 1902. While pur
suing our enquiries on this point we found
that no less than 18 civil actions were in-
instituted against the same Sultan during his
reign in respect to the purchase of landed
properties.
We may therefore assume that Abdul Hamid
himself owned the Mesopotamian oil areas as an in
dividual. Negotiations for the granting of rights to
exploit the oilfields weie conducted directly with the
Sultan, through the Administration of the Civil List
and not through the Administration of the Crown pro
perties, up to the tihne of his deposition by the Young
Turk Party in 1909.
German Option.
The Germans were the first to conclude an ar
rangement with the Sultan, and in 1904 the repre
sentatives of the Anatolian Railway Company obtained
an option for the purpose of examining the possibility
of oil deposits in the Provinces of Mosul and Bagdad,
and to prepare a scheme whereby they could be worked
on joint account. In 1906 this option was considered
at an end and the Sultan began other negotiations.
At this time the field of competition was widened by
the inclusion of a number of English, French and
German interests. Among these was Mr. H. K.
D’arcy, of Anglo-Persian oil fame, who made an appli
cation to the Sultan for rights to exploit the oilfields.
The British Ambassador in Constantinople gave strong
official support to this application.
sources in the whole of the Vilayet of MOUSSUL, within the
properties of My Imperial estates as well as within the other
parts of the Vilayet, seeing that in My Private Imperial
properties situated in the Vilayet of MOUSSUL are found
abundant sources of petroleum.
My Imperial Irade has been promulgated in accordance
with the above, and in consequence of its high tenour My
present Imperial Order has been delivered by My Imperial
Chancery affirming that the Concession for the research and
exploitation of the sources of petroleum in the whole of the
Vilavet of MOUSSUL, in my Private Imperial properties as
well’ as in all other parts of the said Vilayet is exclusively
granted to My Imperial Private Treasury.
You, My Minister above-named will do what is necessary
as regards My Private Treasury.
About this item
- Content
Letters and papers on the frontier between Iraq (also written as Irak in the file) and Turkey, with particular reference to Mosul and questions concerning oil. The file consists mainly of correspondence between Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Curzon, and officials in the Foreign Office, Air Ministry, Colonial Office and Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. [Mustafa İsmet İnönü]. The contents of the file are as follows:
- Sir John Evelyn Shuckburgh to Curzon (15 November 1922). Letter enclosing paper setting out main arguments against evacuating Iraq
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (3 December 1922). Interview with Mukhtar Bey [Mukhtār Beg]; submission of draft telegrams to Foreign Office
- Sir William Tyrrell to Foreign Office (Memo, 3 December 1922, circulated to the Cabinet); interview with Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , 28 November 1922
- Air Staff for Cabinet (5 December 1922). Note: on Sir John Salmond’s proposal for a Forward Policy in the event of Turkish invasion of Iraq or a Resumption of Hostilities with Turkey, 4 December 1922
- Curzon to Foreign Office (6 December 1922). Telegram, 5 December 1922
- Middle East Department (7 December 1922). Note: Mosul – on above telegram
- Foreign Office to Curzon (8 December 1922). Telegram: Mosul
- Curzon to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (14 December 1922). Letter: enclosing Memo on Mosul Vilayet: reasons for refusing Turkish claim
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 December 1922). Curzon for Cabinet. Memo presented to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. on Mosul, 14 December 1922
- Curzon to Cabinet (27 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon enclosing reply to British memo, 23 December 1922
- Curzon for Cabinet (28 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. enclosing counter reply, 26 December 1922
- Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (29 December 1922). Letter with annexed Memo
- Curzon for Cabinet (1 January 1923). Letter Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon
- Sir Percy Cox to Colonial Office (30 December 1922)
- Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame to Sir Sydney Chapman (1 January 1923). Letter: possibility of settlement on basis of oil concessions to Turks and Italians
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (4 January 1923). Memo: conversation with Reader William Bullard and three Turkish experts
- Sir E Crowe to Curzon (3 January 1923). Telegram: from Colonial Office: oil
- Mr Lyndsay to Curzon (4 January 1923). Telegram: paraphrase of Colonial Office telegram to Bagdad [Baghdad], 2 January
- Curzon to Colonial Office (5 January 1923). Telegram: oil
- Sir Ronald William Graham to Curzon (8 January 1923). Letter: (printed for Cabinet) to Curzon: Italian press
- Reader William Bullard to Curzon (9 January 1923). Note: Mosul
- Sir Auckland Geddes (12 January 1923) Telegram: American attitude
- Notes by Curzon (16 January 1923). Handwritten: visit of Aga Petros to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
- Shuckburgh to Forbes Adam (18 January 1923). Letter enclosing draft of telegram to Curzon
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (18 January 1923). Note attaching statement of the history and position with regard to the Mandates in Syria and Iraq and the question of frontiers
- British Case for Northern Frontier of Iraq with Map (19 January 1923). Folder containing notes ‘mostly taken from the memoranda which you (i.e. Curzon) exchanged with Ismet Pasha’ – December 1922
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (20 January 1923). Note: Plebiscite and Mosul
- Forbes Adam for Curzon: ‘Note attaching detailed minute as to the oil in Iraq and the history and present position of the claim of the Turkish Petroleum Company’
- Mr Childs's Statement for the American representatives (23 January 1923)
- Daily Telegraph cutting on League of Nations and Mosul Problem (27 January 1923)
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 January 1923). Speech: reply to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. respecting Mosul, 23 January 1923
- Secretary of State for Colonies to Acting High Commissioner for Iraq (26 January 1923). Paraphrase: telegram: British proposal that question of Northern Frontier of Iraq should be referred to the League of Nations
- High Commissioner, Bagdad to Lord Crew (29 January 1923) Telegram: Enclosing telegram from Iraq Government to Lord Balfour for communication to League of Nations
- Lord Crewe to Curzon (31 January 1923). Telegram: Iraq frontier
- Telegram to Ankara signed by Ismet Hassan [‘Iṣmat Ḥasan] and Rozor Nur [Riḍa Nūr]
- Oil engineering and finance (17 February 1923). Article: The Mesopotamian Oilfields
- The Graphic (17 February 1923). Article: The Mystic City of Mosul
- Colonel Francis Richard Maunsell for Cabinet (24 September 1923). Notes on the Mosul frontier question
- Sir James Edward Masterton-Smith to Foreign Office (3 November 1923). Printed for the information of Curzon, copy of a despatch from the High Commissioner for Iraq, on the subject of the delimitation of the Turco-Irak frontier.
Following documents are undated:
- Lord Balfour to League of Nations. Speech: The frontier between Turkish territory and the territory of Iraq
- The President of the League of Nations. Reply: after Speech by Balfour
- Typewritten report: The question of Mosul
- Typewritten report: The Question of Mosul
The file also includes handwritten notes by Curzon on the Mosul vilayet and groups residing there.
- Extent and format
- 251 folios (1 file)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 251; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [213v] (424/501), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/294, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000019> [accessed 22 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000019
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000019">'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎213v] (424/501)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000019"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0430.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/294
- Title
- 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil'
- Pages
- 1r:28v, 28ar:28av, 29r:72v, 91r:167v, 170r:218r, 218r:251v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎213v] (424/501) 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎213v] (424/501)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0430.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)