'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [204v] (406/501)
The record is made up of 251 folios (1 file). It was created in 15 Nov 1922-3 Nov 1923. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
to settle a frontier, and I will tell the conference why. First, you have to decide who
are to vote, what are to be their a^e, cjiiahtications and length of residence in the
country. A.s Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
has said, many of the people in the Vilayet of Mosul are
nomads, constantly going to and fro between tbe hills and the plains and sometimes
migrating into Persia. Which of all these people are to vote and on what giounds are
they to be selected? Secondly, you have to decide who is to keep order when the
voting takes place. In every plebiscite held since the war it has proved necessary to
have an army to keep the people quiet and prevent them from cutting each other s
throats. Where is the army to come from to keep the peace in Kurdistan ? It cannot
be Turkish or British, as those two countries are interested parties. Is there any
gentleman in this room who is willing to offer an army to go and keep the peace during
this plebiscite ? He will be a great fool if he does.
“ I can give two illustrations of what has happened in recent plebiscites with which
some of us are familiar. One of them was to take place under the Treaty of Versailles
at Teschen in connection with a dispute between the Czechs and the Poles. It gave
rise to so much agitation, rioting anti disorder that the Plebiscite Commission eventually
had to decide that it should not be held at all. then there was another and far worse
case, that of Upper Silesia. There was so much disturbance that the proceedings had
to be postponed for many months. The people who were going to vote were so
disorderly that 20,000 to 30,000 French, British and Italian troops were required in
the area to keep the peace. During the plebiscite period constant raids and murders
disfigured the country. After great difficulty the plebiscite was held, and when the
Plebiscite Commission had to report on tne result they could not agree among
themselves on the line of frontier which they should recommend. They therefore sent
the question to Paris for the Great Powers to settle. I was there myself. We too
could not agree. Thus, after one and a half years had been spent and all these lives
sacrificed and this trouble created, we had to send the question to the League of Nations.
We ended up at the point where I now wish to begin. I therefore respectfully
recommend this example of a plebiscite to the attention of Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
.
“ Let us imagine a plebiscite in Kurdistan. What would happen ? As Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
has said, the population is always moving. ' The majority of the Kurds and a
great part of the Arabs are quite illiterate. They will not know how to vote;
they have never seen a ballot box in their lives, and if they did they would probably
throw it at your head. Then again, who is going to find the troops to keep order ?
How are you to explain to the people what they are to vote about ? The Kurds would
doubtless vote for an independent Kurdistan ; the Arabs for an Arab State ; the Turks
for Turkish nationality ; and the Christians for anything which will keep them away
from the Turks. How can you define frontiers under such conditions ? The result
would be inextricable confusion, and the Great Powers would hold themselves up to
ridicule. Plebiscites are only good for a unified, not a mixed, population, and for a
single, not a confused, issue.
“ That is why a plebiscite in Kurdistan is a proposition which no one who has any
experience'of recent events can possibly support.
“ I now come to my final proposal and to the Turkish reply. I ended by suggesting
that this difficult and disputed question should be referred for examination and decision
to the League of Nations. This proposal received the warm support of my French and
Italian colleagues on behalf of their respective delegations ; it therefore came before
the commission with the full weight of Allied approval. No other delegation spoke on
the matter, but I venture to say that there is not a single representative of a single
delegation here who will not agree with M. Bompard that it is a wise, equitable and
liberal proposal. The Council of the League of Nations is a body composed to a large
extent of representatives of neutral States, detached, absolutely impartial, and
possessing great moral authority. Great Britain is ready to put her case into its
hands ; but Turkey has so little confidence in her case that she dare not submit it to
arbitration of any kind. Ismet Pasba has just rejected arbitration in general and he
therefore presumably rejects arbitration by the League of Nations. I will now tell him
what it is that he has rejected.
“ Supposing my proposal is accepted, what will happen ? Here is the Covenant of
the League describing its procedure and the action to be taken by the States which
belong to it. Only three weeks ago the Turkish delegation signified that their first
step after the conclusion of peace will be to ask to join the League. If this dispute
were referred to the League, Turkey not being a member, the first act of the League
under article 17 of the Covenant would be to invite Turkey to become a member for
the purposes of the dispute. The Council of the League would then institute an
About this item
- Content
Letters and papers on the frontier between Iraq (also written as Irak in the file) and Turkey, with particular reference to Mosul and questions concerning oil. The file consists mainly of correspondence between Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Curzon, and officials in the Foreign Office, Air Ministry, Colonial Office and Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. [Mustafa İsmet İnönü]. The contents of the file are as follows:
- Sir John Evelyn Shuckburgh to Curzon (15 November 1922). Letter enclosing paper setting out main arguments against evacuating Iraq
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (3 December 1922). Interview with Mukhtar Bey [Mukhtār Beg]; submission of draft telegrams to Foreign Office
- Sir William Tyrrell to Foreign Office (Memo, 3 December 1922, circulated to the Cabinet); interview with Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , 28 November 1922
- Air Staff for Cabinet (5 December 1922). Note: on Sir John Salmond’s proposal for a Forward Policy in the event of Turkish invasion of Iraq or a Resumption of Hostilities with Turkey, 4 December 1922
- Curzon to Foreign Office (6 December 1922). Telegram, 5 December 1922
- Middle East Department (7 December 1922). Note: Mosul – on above telegram
- Foreign Office to Curzon (8 December 1922). Telegram: Mosul
- Curzon to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (14 December 1922). Letter: enclosing Memo on Mosul Vilayet: reasons for refusing Turkish claim
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 December 1922). Curzon for Cabinet. Memo presented to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. on Mosul, 14 December 1922
- Curzon to Cabinet (27 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon enclosing reply to British memo, 23 December 1922
- Curzon for Cabinet (28 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. enclosing counter reply, 26 December 1922
- Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (29 December 1922). Letter with annexed Memo
- Curzon for Cabinet (1 January 1923). Letter Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon
- Sir Percy Cox to Colonial Office (30 December 1922)
- Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame to Sir Sydney Chapman (1 January 1923). Letter: possibility of settlement on basis of oil concessions to Turks and Italians
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (4 January 1923). Memo: conversation with Reader William Bullard and three Turkish experts
- Sir E Crowe to Curzon (3 January 1923). Telegram: from Colonial Office: oil
- Mr Lyndsay to Curzon (4 January 1923). Telegram: paraphrase of Colonial Office telegram to Bagdad [Baghdad], 2 January
- Curzon to Colonial Office (5 January 1923). Telegram: oil
- Sir Ronald William Graham to Curzon (8 January 1923). Letter: (printed for Cabinet) to Curzon: Italian press
- Reader William Bullard to Curzon (9 January 1923). Note: Mosul
- Sir Auckland Geddes (12 January 1923) Telegram: American attitude
- Notes by Curzon (16 January 1923). Handwritten: visit of Aga Petros to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
- Shuckburgh to Forbes Adam (18 January 1923). Letter enclosing draft of telegram to Curzon
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (18 January 1923). Note attaching statement of the history and position with regard to the Mandates in Syria and Iraq and the question of frontiers
- British Case for Northern Frontier of Iraq with Map (19 January 1923). Folder containing notes ‘mostly taken from the memoranda which you (i.e. Curzon) exchanged with Ismet Pasha’ – December 1922
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (20 January 1923). Note: Plebiscite and Mosul
- Forbes Adam for Curzon: ‘Note attaching detailed minute as to the oil in Iraq and the history and present position of the claim of the Turkish Petroleum Company’
- Mr Childs's Statement for the American representatives (23 January 1923)
- Daily Telegraph cutting on League of Nations and Mosul Problem (27 January 1923)
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 January 1923). Speech: reply to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. respecting Mosul, 23 January 1923
- Secretary of State for Colonies to Acting High Commissioner for Iraq (26 January 1923). Paraphrase: telegram: British proposal that question of Northern Frontier of Iraq should be referred to the League of Nations
- High Commissioner, Bagdad to Lord Crew (29 January 1923) Telegram: Enclosing telegram from Iraq Government to Lord Balfour for communication to League of Nations
- Lord Crewe to Curzon (31 January 1923). Telegram: Iraq frontier
- Telegram to Ankara signed by Ismet Hassan [‘Iṣmat Ḥasan] and Rozor Nur [Riḍa Nūr]
- Oil engineering and finance (17 February 1923). Article: The Mesopotamian Oilfields
- The Graphic (17 February 1923). Article: The Mystic City of Mosul
- Colonel Francis Richard Maunsell for Cabinet (24 September 1923). Notes on the Mosul frontier question
- Sir James Edward Masterton-Smith to Foreign Office (3 November 1923). Printed for the information of Curzon, copy of a despatch from the High Commissioner for Iraq, on the subject of the delimitation of the Turco-Irak frontier.
Following documents are undated:
- Lord Balfour to League of Nations. Speech: The frontier between Turkish territory and the territory of Iraq
- The President of the League of Nations. Reply: after Speech by Balfour
- Typewritten report: The question of Mosul
- Typewritten report: The Question of Mosul
The file also includes handwritten notes by Curzon on the Mosul vilayet and groups residing there.
- Extent and format
- 251 folios (1 file)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 251; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [204v] (406/501), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/294, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000007> [accessed 14 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000007
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000007">'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎204v] (406/501)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546289.0x000007"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0410.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/294
- Title
- 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil'
- Pages
- 1r:28v, 28ar:28av, 29r:72v, 91r:167v, 170r:218r, 218r:251v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎204v] (406/501) 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎204v] (406/501)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0410.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)