'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [200v] (398/501)
The record is made up of 251 folios (1 file). It was created in 15 Nov 1922-3 Nov 1923. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
* ♦
t a
* «
• «
$
the 9th November he received orders from the Turkish Government to evacuate. Apart
from this, will Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
allow me to remind him that armistice conditions have
nothing to do with the final settlement of the conditions of peace ? There is not a war
in history in which movements of troops have not taken jDlace after the conclusion of
an armistice. In spite of the armistice of Mudania the movements of troops in Eastern
Ihrace are going on at this moment, as is w^ell known. There is not a single treatv in
history in which the armistice lines have been the peace lines ultimately laid down.
Moreover, article 7 of the Mudros armistice expressly authorised the Allies’ troops to
occupy strategical points in Turkey outside the armistice lines in the event of any
situation arising which threatens the security of t{ie Allied lines. That was precisely
the case with Mosul, and therefore the occupation of that city, only a few miles distant,
a few hours after the armistice was signed was fully provided for by the terms of the
armistice itself.
. “ I on ly desire to allude to one more subject before I conclude, and that is a subject
which was not referred to by Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
, but which is widely and constantly discussed
m the press of the world. It is supposed and alleged that the attitude of the British
Government with regard to the retention of Mosul is affected by the question of oil.
The question of the oil of the Mosul Vilayet has nothing to do with my argument. I
have presented the British case on its own merits quite independently" of any natural
resources there may be in the country. I do not know how much oil there mav be in
the neighbourhood of Mosul, or whether it can be worked at a profit, or whether it may
turn out after all to be a fraud During the time I have been connected with the
foreign affairs of my country I have never spoken to or interviewed an oil magnate. I
have never spoken to or negotiated with a single concessionnaire or would-be
concessionnaire for the Mosul oil or any other oil. I do not think that everyone in this
room can say the same. ^ It is notorious that since we have been here in Lausanne
three representatives of the Turkish delegation were sent to London to offer oil
concessions in the Mosul area (which is not theirs to dispose of i to British conces-
sionnaires. That was done without reference to me and without my knowledge I
believe these gentlemen when they arrived in London said they had come over in-order
to inspect the institutions and collections of that great capital. I don’t think they
saw many of them. They came back very quickly when they found there was no actual
business ^o be done behind my back, and their visit to British institutions was therefore
postponed. I hope that next time they come to London they will give me the pleasure
of calling on them, and I will have the greatest satisfaction in taking them personally
to the British Museum. Meanwhile what are the facts of the case ? Just before the
war a concession was given for the oilfields of the Mosul and Bagdad Vilayets by the
Turkish Government to a British limited liability company—the Turkish Petroleum
Gompany. the Germans had an interest in the company, and when they were defeated
m tie war their interest passed to the British. The British Government after full
examination were convinced and remain convinced of the validity of this ’concession
They lelt and feel bound to uphold it. But both the British Government and company
itself recognised that oil is a commodity m which the world is interested, and as to
winch it is a great mistake to claim or to exercise a monopoly. Accordingly the
company, with the full knowledge and support of the British Government, took steos
and negotiations have ever since been proceeding, to associate the interests of other
countries and other parties in this concession, so that all those that are equally
interested may have a share.
If the exploitation is successful, Irak will be the main gainer and the world will
gam also, and! have no doubt that
Anatolia
Peninsula that forms most of modern-day Turkey.
will profit in her town. That is the
substance of the oil affair, which I have explained to the commission in order that they
may knovy the exact amount ot influence-and it is nil-whieh has been exercised in
ofMosul ° n * attl 6 Which 1 haV6 Ventured t0 take U P *oday on this question
“ 1 lla ™ n " w completed my statement of the reasons which have rendered it
impossible for the British Government to agree to the Turkish demands. With she
utmost desire to arrive at an amicable solution with the Turkish delegation of ill
the difficulties that confront us, and to conclude a treaty honourable to both this is a
demand which 1 am bound to resist from every consideration of obligation and of
honour. It is a demand which I cannot conceive to be in the interests of the country
itself to concede m virtue of all the considerations, economic, strategical pffikicaf
historical, geographical to wh.ch Ismet
Pasha
An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
appealed, and on each one of wldch f
have been will,ng to rest my case to-day. Whatever be the strength of mv case
1 venture to say that no weaker case than that of the Turkish delegation has ever Sen
placed before an international conference. ' er oeen
About this item
- Content
Letters and papers on the frontier between Iraq (also written as Irak in the file) and Turkey, with particular reference to Mosul and questions concerning oil. The file consists mainly of correspondence between Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs George Curzon, and officials in the Foreign Office, Air Ministry, Colonial Office and Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. [Mustafa İsmet İnönü]. The contents of the file are as follows:
- Sir John Evelyn Shuckburgh to Curzon (15 November 1922). Letter enclosing paper setting out main arguments against evacuating Iraq
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (3 December 1922). Interview with Mukhtar Bey [Mukhtār Beg]; submission of draft telegrams to Foreign Office
- Sir William Tyrrell to Foreign Office (Memo, 3 December 1922, circulated to the Cabinet); interview with Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , 28 November 1922
- Air Staff for Cabinet (5 December 1922). Note: on Sir John Salmond’s proposal for a Forward Policy in the event of Turkish invasion of Iraq or a Resumption of Hostilities with Turkey, 4 December 1922
- Curzon to Foreign Office (6 December 1922). Telegram, 5 December 1922
- Middle East Department (7 December 1922). Note: Mosul – on above telegram
- Foreign Office to Curzon (8 December 1922). Telegram: Mosul
- Curzon to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (14 December 1922). Letter: enclosing Memo on Mosul Vilayet: reasons for refusing Turkish claim
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 December 1922). Curzon for Cabinet. Memo presented to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. on Mosul, 14 December 1922
- Curzon to Cabinet (27 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon enclosing reply to British memo, 23 December 1922
- Curzon for Cabinet (28 December 1922). Letter: Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. enclosing counter reply, 26 December 1922
- Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. (29 December 1922). Letter with annexed Memo
- Curzon for Cabinet (1 January 1923). Letter Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. to Curzon
- Sir Percy Cox to Colonial Office (30 December 1922)
- Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame to Sir Sydney Chapman (1 January 1923). Letter: possibility of settlement on basis of oil concessions to Turks and Italians
- Eric Graham Forbes Adam for Curzon (4 January 1923). Memo: conversation with Reader William Bullard and three Turkish experts
- Sir E Crowe to Curzon (3 January 1923). Telegram: from Colonial Office: oil
- Mr Lyndsay to Curzon (4 January 1923). Telegram: paraphrase of Colonial Office telegram to Bagdad [Baghdad], 2 January
- Curzon to Colonial Office (5 January 1923). Telegram: oil
- Sir Ronald William Graham to Curzon (8 January 1923). Letter: (printed for Cabinet) to Curzon: Italian press
- Reader William Bullard to Curzon (9 January 1923). Note: Mosul
- Sir Auckland Geddes (12 January 1923) Telegram: American attitude
- Notes by Curzon (16 January 1923). Handwritten: visit of Aga Petros to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders.
- Shuckburgh to Forbes Adam (18 January 1923). Letter enclosing draft of telegram to Curzon
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (18 January 1923). Note attaching statement of the history and position with regard to the Mandates in Syria and Iraq and the question of frontiers
- British Case for Northern Frontier of Iraq with Map (19 January 1923). Folder containing notes ‘mostly taken from the memoranda which you (i.e. Curzon) exchanged with Ismet Pasha’ – December 1922
- Forbes Adam for Curzon (20 January 1923). Note: Plebiscite and Mosul
- Forbes Adam for Curzon: ‘Note attaching detailed minute as to the oil in Iraq and the history and present position of the claim of the Turkish Petroleum Company’
- Mr Childs's Statement for the American representatives (23 January 1923)
- Daily Telegraph cutting on League of Nations and Mosul Problem (27 January 1923)
- Curzon for Cabinet (26 January 1923). Speech: reply to Ismet Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. respecting Mosul, 23 January 1923
- Secretary of State for Colonies to Acting High Commissioner for Iraq (26 January 1923). Paraphrase: telegram: British proposal that question of Northern Frontier of Iraq should be referred to the League of Nations
- High Commissioner, Bagdad to Lord Crew (29 January 1923) Telegram: Enclosing telegram from Iraq Government to Lord Balfour for communication to League of Nations
- Lord Crewe to Curzon (31 January 1923). Telegram: Iraq frontier
- Telegram to Ankara signed by Ismet Hassan [‘Iṣmat Ḥasan] and Rozor Nur [Riḍa Nūr]
- Oil engineering and finance (17 February 1923). Article: The Mesopotamian Oilfields
- The Graphic (17 February 1923). Article: The Mystic City of Mosul
- Colonel Francis Richard Maunsell for Cabinet (24 September 1923). Notes on the Mosul frontier question
- Sir James Edward Masterton-Smith to Foreign Office (3 November 1923). Printed for the information of Curzon, copy of a despatch from the High Commissioner for Iraq, on the subject of the delimitation of the Turco-Irak frontier.
Following documents are undated:
- Lord Balfour to League of Nations. Speech: The frontier between Turkish territory and the territory of Iraq
- The President of the League of Nations. Reply: after Speech by Balfour
- Typewritten report: The question of Mosul
- Typewritten report: The Question of Mosul
The file also includes handwritten notes by Curzon on the Mosul vilayet and groups residing there.
- Extent and format
- 251 folios (1 file)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 251; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [200v] (398/501), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/294, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100130546287.0x0000c7> [accessed 14 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546287.0x0000c7
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546287.0x0000c7">'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎200v] (398/501)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100130546287.0x0000c7"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0402.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/294
- Title
- 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil'
- Pages
- 1r:28v, 28ar:28av, 29r:72v, 91r:167v, 170r:218r, 218r:251v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎200v] (398/501) 'Mosul Question, Lausanne 1922-1923 and after - Papers, despatches, speeches - Hotel de la Mer at Lausanne - Correspondence about oil' [‎200v] (398/501)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002c2/Mss Eur F112_294_0402.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)