Skip to item: of 1,150
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎381r] (766/1150)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (573 folios). It was created in 5 Dec 1921-28 Jan 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

A
(W\
V J
urd erf round storare.
It is unlikely that Fersians (or local Indian
traders) would put much money into a road or motor company,
tut they would probably support a railway er terprise to
the extent oi their power.
What the Persians most want is cheap transport for
jroods. If such transport is also quick, bo much the better.
Ihey also need any kind of rapid transport for personnel,
ihe present condition of the road is deplorable. It is
about an even chance that a car will break down aua on a
run of a few hundred miles. On the other hand, if an
alignment is well chosen, a perfect rood for light traffic
can be made by difpirif a two foot trench on either side of
a dead straight alignment and throwing up the spoil of
earth mixed with stones, ir the centre. Such roads,
believed to be common in dry parts of the United States,
are very cheap, consolidate naturally with the furst rain,
and are durable and easily repaired. Ko bridging is
necessary. Any attempt to make a roue of rood metal in the
ordinary Knglieh way is useless in this dry country and
very expensive.
LaDour usually available ir, large quantity of about
£ krurc per uay, to biul t be acidocl 1 pounds of country
flour if the men have to vorh out in the desert. I sols
required are good picks, and shovels in toe desero. In
populated places the inhabitants can provide, and prefer,
lie local long handled shovels, but 'cave no picks. Cartels
would be required for watering ware iff parties in certain
Places. One good Indian overseer can hurdle a gang of 200
to 300 men. S >me local overseers also available. Bigger
parties than 250 are uneconomical. Best seasons for work
are early spring and autumn, when climate i- buit^bxe, du.ys
a good length, and little or no tentage required lor local
workers. Plenty of good labour available irom bis tin,
Provided it is well handled, and fair labour in Kairat.

About this item

Content

This volume contains papers relating to the construction of the Trans-Persian Railway. It contains material relating to:

  • The Persian Railway Syndicate’s attempt to enlist the aid of Rabbi Joseph Saul Kornfeld, the United States Envoy to Persia [Iran], and the British Foreign Office’s subsequent unfavourable attitude towards the Syndicate
  • The Persian Railway Syndicate’s proposal to invite American companies for the construction of railways in Persia
  • The concessions for the Mohammerah [Khorramshahr]-Khanakin [Khanaqin] and Khanakin-Tehran railways
  • The proposed railway from Khanakin to Tehran and the estimated cost for the three principal divisions of the railway
  • The restrictions of the British Government on the Persian Railway Syndicate’s grant of a loan to the Persian Government
  • The possibility of a ‘fusion of interests’ between the Persian Railway Syndicate and the Stronach Dutton System of Road Rails Limited
  • The possible extension of the American Chester Group’s railway concession from Turkey into Persia
  • The plans of the Prime Minister of Persia [Rezā Khān Sardār Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. Sepah] for a railway line extending from Ahwaz [Ahvaz] to Khorramabad, Dizful [Dezful], and Sultanabad [Arak] to Tehran
  • The endeavour of an American group to obtain a concession for a line from Mohammerah to Khorramabad and Tehran
  • The expenditures of the Persian Railway Syndicate for the Khanakin-Tehran and the Mohamerah-Khoramabad surveys
  • The possibility of forming a Railway Syndicate with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and Standard Oil Company
  • The Persian Government’s decision to carry out a survey of the Mohammerah-Tehran-Bandar-i Gez [Bandar-i Gaz] railway line with the assistance of a German engineer
  • The Consortium industriel pour l’Orient’s proposal to build a railway connecting Meshed [Mashhad] to the Tripoli-Homs Line
  • The preference of the British Army Council and the Air Council for an East-West rather than a North-South railway in Persia for strategic reasons
  • The exploitation of coal and iron deposits in Mazanderan [Mazandaran] for the construction of railways in Persia, and the concerns of Russia about a Trans-Persian Railway connecting the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. to the Caspian Sea
  • The Act of the Persian Majlis [Parliament] for the construction of the Persian Trunk Railway
  • The Persian Majlis’s Passage of the Bill for Railway Survey and Construction
  • The Persian Majlis’s passage of the Railway Construction Bill, from Mohammerah and Bandar-i Gez to Tehran
  • The Persian Majlis’s passage of a law for constructing a railway between Khor Musa-Mohammerah-Bandar-i Gez;
  • The Persian Majlis’s authorisation of the Minister of Public Work to employ foreign experts for the construction of the Railway;
  • The inauguration of the Bandar-i Gaz-Tehran-Ahwaz Railway in the presence of the Shah of Persia [Rezā Shāh Pahlavi]
  • The British concerns and preference for a British rather than an American firm to build the Southern Section of the Railway
  • The passage of the Railway Survey Law by the Persian Majlis and the contract between the Persian Government and the American company Ulen, and two German companies, Philipp Holzmann and Julius Berger-Siemens Union [sic., Siemens Bauunion] to carry out a complete survey of the Railway
  • The contract between the Persian Government, represented by Minister of Public Works [General Ḥabib Allāh Khān Shaybānī], and the Persian Railway Syndicate, represented by MD Carrel and MNS Mavrogordato
  • The contracts between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate for the constructions of ports at Bandar-i Qays and Khor Musa (Bandar-i Shahpur) and a dam over the Karun River at Ahwaz
  • The plans for building the line from Bandar Shapur north of Ahwaz, and revival of the line from Hamadan to Tehran
  • The construction of the railway lines from Bandar Shah and Khor Musa, the diversion of German resources to the construction of electrical and cement works, and the postponement of building a port at Khor Musa
  • The reservations of the British Minister in Persia [Robert Henry Clive] about the construction of the Railway as opposed to motor roads in Persia, and the subsidisation of the enterprise through the tea and sugar monopolies
  • The increase in the cost of the Southern Section of the Railway and predicted opposition of the Persian Government
  • The visit by the Shah of Persia to the Southern Section of the Railway, his unfavourable impression of the state of the railway, and the American Minister in Persia’s advice to Ulen and Company to stop working on the railway in case of difficulties with the Persian Government
  • The cancellation of the contract between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate over delayed payments, and the agreement between the German and Ulen groups within the Syndicate to work on the Northern and Southern sections of the Trans-Persian Railway respectively
  • The Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concerns about the Railway providing greater access and mobility to the Russians
  • The dispute between the Persian Government and the German-American syndicate for the construction of the Railway
  • The negotiations between the Persian Government and the German companies Julius Berger Konsortium, Philipp Holzmann, and Siemens Bauunion for the construction of the Northern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway
  • The possible takeover by the Batignolles Construction Company of the building of the Southern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway from the American and British companies Ulen and Company and Stewart and McDonnell
  • The Persian Government’s appointment of Suzuki Hajime from the Japanese Railway Department’s Engineering Bureau
  • The breakdown of negotiations between the Batignolles Construction Company and the Government of Persia, and the latter’s decision to proceed with the construction of the remaining sections of the railway
  • The proposals of the Batignolles Construction Company to the Government of Persia in the absence of a contract
  • The extension of the Southern Section of the Railway from Khor Musa to Dizful, Hamadan and Kazvin [Qazvin], and the Northern Section from Tehran to Sari and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.

The volume also includes the following sketch maps:

  • A sketch map of the Trans-Persian Railway, from Khor Musa to Sari and the coast of the Caspian Sea, showing the ‘Line Completed’, ‘Line Surveyed’, and ‘Division between the Northern and Southern Sections’ (f 14)
  • A sketch map of the Northern Section of the Railway, showing the routes to Pahlavi, Semnan, and Balfurush [Barfurush], with a second map of the Southern Section, showing alternative routes and termini, running either from Mohammerah or Khor Musa to Dizful and Hamadan (f 156)
  • A sketch map showing the existing and projected railways in Persia (f 204).
Extent and format
1 volume (573 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 357 (Persia: Railways) consists of two volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/793-794. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: The foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 573; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎381r] (766/1150), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/794, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100110106182.0x0000a7> [accessed 8 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106182.0x0000a7">File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [&lrm;381r] (766/1150)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106182.0x0000a7">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0766.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image