File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [267r] (538/1150)
The record is made up of 1 volume (573 folios). It was created in 5 Dec 1921-28 Jan 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
Document it the Property of His Britannic Majesty’* Government.]
r PERSIA-
confidential
P
4156
1925
[November 23, 1925.]
Section 1.
[E 7208/110/34] No. 1.
Sir P. Loraine to Mr. Austen Chamberlain.—{Received November 23.)
No. 568 .)
N ' _ Tehran, October 31, 1925.
ir ’ j HAVE the hoDOiir to transmit herewith copy of nn article regarding railway
instruction in Persia which appeared in one of the Tehran newspapers a short time
It is of interest as reflecting the opinion of the majority of the public, though I
not sure that it is shared by the Government. There can be little doubt indeed
that the alignment chosen for the main railway line which it is the present aspiration
of the country as a whole to see built in the near future will be that of Mohammerah-
Khorremabad-Sultanabad- Tehran.
I have forwarded copies of this despatch to the Government of India, His Majesty’s
Commissioner at Bagdad and to the Department of Overseas Trade.
I have, &c.
PEBCY LOB AIN E.
co:
am
Enclosure in No. 1.
Translation of the Leading Article in the Newspaper “ Kushish,” dated
July 15, 1925, No. C>9.
THE economic revival of this country depends upon the existence of a main
railway to pass through the middle of the central provinces and joining the fertile
central portion to the frontiers ot foreign countries. _
In the discussions and enquiries made recently it has often been noticed that many
people are in favour of the construction of railways from Duzdap to Meshed or from
Astara to Maku, &c. The partisans of these lines are of the opinion that they are the
essential lines winch should be started before any other in the country. _
The carrying out of this plan would mean that those parts of Persia adjoining the
frontiers which already have good communications with foreign countries would have
the benefit of improved transport and other parts remain in the present undeveloped
st^its
In our opinion the above plan is not a good one and the lines mentioned should be
reckoned only as branch lines since they can in no way be deemed to be essentia
transcontinental lines. It being our view that the first line should pass the mi e 0
Persia and join one frontier to the other, we must examine the second plan that whet aer
the north to south line or the east to west line is the most essential^ The advocates o
either of the above two lines set forth many proofs for the advisability of then sc erne
and each party brings some evidence to back up the soundness of its opinion. or
instance, the supporters of the west to east line point to the recent improvements m
transport in Mesopotamia and Turkey and say that this line would connect eima wi m
the Mediterranean Sea by the shortest route. In addition this line can ;e CNten e o
the Indian frontier and connect Europe to the east by the way of Persia. ey a so
add that when Persia becomes the entrepot for trade between Europe an. n(: ia = ^
will be an increased opportunity for investment of capital which will compensa e or i©
deficit in the railway budget during the early years of construction.
The advocates of the north to south line say that if the tianscontmen a rai way
traverses Persia from east to west, it will inevitably cross the barren lanos of eastern
parts of the country. This will entail so much loss that it will become impossible to
maintain it. Possessing as it does good and well situated ports India cannot be
expected to transport her merchandise by land instead of by sea ^ 10 1 18 easl e r a11
cheaper. Hence there will not be much traffic for the railway except a few passengers
a ml the postal service which may prefer the railway to the sea route. If this is the
case, the returns will not compensate the loss which will be incurred m constructing the
[1125 z—1]
About this item
- Content
This volume contains papers relating to the construction of the Trans-Persian Railway. It contains material relating to:
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s attempt to enlist the aid of Rabbi Joseph Saul Kornfeld, the United States Envoy to Persia [Iran], and the British Foreign Office’s subsequent unfavourable attitude towards the Syndicate
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s proposal to invite American companies for the construction of railways in Persia
- The concessions for the Mohammerah [Khorramshahr]-Khanakin [Khanaqin] and Khanakin-Tehran railways
- The proposed railway from Khanakin to Tehran and the estimated cost for the three principal divisions of the railway
- The restrictions of the British Government on the Persian Railway Syndicate’s grant of a loan to the Persian Government
- The possibility of a ‘fusion of interests’ between the Persian Railway Syndicate and the Stronach Dutton System of Road Rails Limited
- The possible extension of the American Chester Group’s railway concession from Turkey into Persia
- The plans of the Prime Minister of Persia [Rezā Khān Sardār Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. Sepah] for a railway line extending from Ahwaz [Ahvaz] to Khorramabad, Dizful [Dezful], and Sultanabad [Arak] to Tehran
- The endeavour of an American group to obtain a concession for a line from Mohammerah to Khorramabad and Tehran
- The expenditures of the Persian Railway Syndicate for the Khanakin-Tehran and the Mohamerah-Khoramabad surveys
- The possibility of forming a Railway Syndicate with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and Standard Oil Company
- The Persian Government’s decision to carry out a survey of the Mohammerah-Tehran-Bandar-i Gez [Bandar-i Gaz] railway line with the assistance of a German engineer
- The Consortium industriel pour l’Orient’s proposal to build a railway connecting Meshed [Mashhad] to the Tripoli-Homs Line
- The preference of the British Army Council and the Air Council for an East-West rather than a North-South railway in Persia for strategic reasons
- The exploitation of coal and iron deposits in Mazanderan [Mazandaran] for the construction of railways in Persia, and the concerns of Russia about a Trans-Persian Railway connecting the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. to the Caspian Sea
- The Act of the Persian Majlis [Parliament] for the construction of the Persian Trunk Railway
- The Persian Majlis’s Passage of the Bill for Railway Survey and Construction
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of the Railway Construction Bill, from Mohammerah and Bandar-i Gez to Tehran
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of a law for constructing a railway between Khor Musa-Mohammerah-Bandar-i Gez;
- The Persian Majlis’s authorisation of the Minister of Public Work to employ foreign experts for the construction of the Railway;
- The inauguration of the Bandar-i Gaz-Tehran-Ahwaz Railway in the presence of the Shah of Persia [Rezā Shāh Pahlavi]
- The British concerns and preference for a British rather than an American firm to build the Southern Section of the Railway
- The passage of the Railway Survey Law by the Persian Majlis and the contract between the Persian Government and the American company Ulen, and two German companies, Philipp Holzmann and Julius Berger-Siemens Union [sic., Siemens Bauunion] to carry out a complete survey of the Railway
- The contract between the Persian Government, represented by Minister of Public Works [General Ḥabib Allāh Khān Shaybānī], and the Persian Railway Syndicate, represented by MD Carrel and MNS Mavrogordato
- The contracts between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate for the constructions of ports at Bandar-i Qays and Khor Musa (Bandar-i Shahpur) and a dam over the Karun River at Ahwaz
- The plans for building the line from Bandar Shapur north of Ahwaz, and revival of the line from Hamadan to Tehran
- The construction of the railway lines from Bandar Shah and Khor Musa, the diversion of German resources to the construction of electrical and cement works, and the postponement of building a port at Khor Musa
- The reservations of the British Minister in Persia [Robert Henry Clive] about the construction of the Railway as opposed to motor roads in Persia, and the subsidisation of the enterprise through the tea and sugar monopolies
- The increase in the cost of the Southern Section of the Railway and predicted opposition of the Persian Government
- The visit by the Shah of Persia to the Southern Section of the Railway, his unfavourable impression of the state of the railway, and the American Minister in Persia’s advice to Ulen and Company to stop working on the railway in case of difficulties with the Persian Government
- The cancellation of the contract between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate over delayed payments, and the agreement between the German and Ulen groups within the Syndicate to work on the Northern and Southern sections of the Trans-Persian Railway respectively
- The Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concerns about the Railway providing greater access and mobility to the Russians
- The dispute between the Persian Government and the German-American syndicate for the construction of the Railway
- The negotiations between the Persian Government and the German companies Julius Berger Konsortium, Philipp Holzmann, and Siemens Bauunion for the construction of the Northern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway
- The possible takeover by the Batignolles Construction Company of the building of the Southern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway from the American and British companies Ulen and Company and Stewart and McDonnell
- The Persian Government’s appointment of Suzuki Hajime from the Japanese Railway Department’s Engineering Bureau
- The breakdown of negotiations between the Batignolles Construction Company and the Government of Persia, and the latter’s decision to proceed with the construction of the remaining sections of the railway
- The proposals of the Batignolles Construction Company to the Government of Persia in the absence of a contract
- The extension of the Southern Section of the Railway from Khor Musa to Dizful, Hamadan and Kazvin [Qazvin], and the Northern Section from Tehran to Sari and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.
The volume also includes the following sketch maps:
- A sketch map of the Trans-Persian Railway, from Khor Musa to Sari and the coast of the Caspian Sea, showing the ‘Line Completed’, ‘Line Surveyed’, and ‘Division between the Northern and Southern Sections’ (f 14)
- A sketch map of the Northern Section of the Railway, showing the routes to Pahlavi, Semnan, and Balfurush [Barfurush], with a second map of the Southern Section, showing alternative routes and termini, running either from Mohammerah or Khor Musa to Dizful and Hamadan (f 156)
- A sketch map showing the existing and projected railways in Persia (f 204).
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (573 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 357 (Persia: Railways) consists of two volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/793-794. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: The foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 573; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [267r] (538/1150), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/794, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100110106181.0x00008b> [accessed 6 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106181.0x00008b
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106181.0x00008b">File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎267r] (538/1150)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106181.0x00008b"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0538.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/794
- Title
- File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’
- Pages
- 267r:267v
- Author
- Government of Iran
- Usage terms
- The copyright status is unknown. Please contact [email protected] with any information you have regarding this item.
![File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎267r] (538/1150) File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎267r] (538/1150)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0538.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)