Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [152r] (307/380)
The record is made up of 1 file (187 folios). It was created in 1 Jul 1916-7 Dec 1918. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
I .—General Commitments,
(i.) His Majesty’s Government have not committed themselves to giving up any
of their pre-existing rights, relations, facilities, or other interests, political or economic,
in this region (e.cj., territorial possessions, protectorates, capitulations, concessions to
British subjects, &c.).
(ii.) They have declared in a general way that the non-lurkish populations shall
be liberated from Turkish misrule, and given an opportunity of national life and economic
development. . .
(iii.) They have pledged themselves, in general or specifically, that the legitimate
interests of the Moslem world, Jewry, the Boman Catholic Church, and other interna
tional bodies in shrines and holy cities situated in this region, or in territories in this
region where they have traditional claims, shall not be prejudiced in the settlement, or
even that they shall be secured more satisfactorily than hitherto.
They have also pledged themselves to the satisfaction, if possible, of specific
desiderata of their Allies, and they are morally bound to take all legitimate interests
of their Allies into consideration.
(iv.) They have entered into positive permanent liabilities, both military and
political, towards certain independent Arab rulers, and have assured the inhabitants of
certain occupied territories specifically that they shall not be put back under lurkish
rule.
II .—Commitments in Different Areas.
(1.) As regards Eui'opean Turkey and
Anatolia
Peninsula that forms most of modern-day Turkey.
, His Majesty s Government are
not pledged to the extinction of an independent l urkish National State, but they did
provisionally agree (see Schedule, No. 12) that Italy shall establish such direct or indirect
administration or control as she desires in the Green Area, and shall have political and
economic priority in Area C, though the latter is to form part of an independent State
(presumably Turkey). Italian rights in the Green Area and Area G are subject to the
following limitations : Smyrna is to be a free port for British and Jbrench trade; the
existing Ottoman customs tariff is to remain in force tor twenty years ; and there are
to be no internal customs barriers between any of the “ coloured or ‘ lettered areas.
The British-owned Aidin Hallway m the Green Area is protected by a mutual
undertaking on the part of Great Britain, Italy, and France (No. 12) that the interests
of each Power in the areas assigned to the others shall be scrupulously respected.
His Majesty’s Government have not consented to any modification of the Capitula
tion Treaties in European Turkey or
Anatolia
Peninsula that forms most of modern-day Turkey.
, or in any other part of the former
territories of the Ottoman Empire ; but since these treaties are bipartite only, they
have lapsed with the war and will have to be renewed specifically if their maintenance
is desired.
As regards the Control of the Black Sea Straits, His Majesty’s Government are no
longer bound by their qualified acceptance of the Russian circular telegram of the
4th March, 1915, in which Russia claimed those portions of the littoral of the Straits
which are coloured yellow on the map. Their hands are now entirely free in regard both
to the control of the Straits and to the disposal of Constantinople.
(2.) As regards the Dodekannese group of islands, which are still nominally Ottoman
territory, but have been occupied by Italy since 1911, we have pledged ourselves that
Italy shall obtain complete sovereignty over them (No. 7, article 8).
As regards Cypirns, we are pledged not to cede it to any third Power without the
previous consent of France (No. 11, article 4.)
(3.) As regards Armenia, we are bound, perhaps juridically and certainly morally,
by article 61 of the Berlin Treaty (No. 3), under which Turkey is pledged to
“ introduce ameliorations and reforms into the provinces inhabited by Armenians.”
This article was substituted, at our instance, for article 16 of the superseded treaty of
San Stephano, which provided that the Russian troops should remain in occupation of
these provinces until satisfactory reforms were carried out. Turkey has actually
omitted to carry out her pledge for forty years, in spite of repeated protests from His
Majesty’s Government, and has udded the massacres of 1895-7, 1909, and 1915 (the
worst of all) to her record of misrule.
It is clearly incumbent upon us to put an end to these wrongs to humanity and
violations of an international treaty to which we are a party, now that it lies within
our power to do so.
About this item
- Content
This file contains correspondence, memoranda, maps, manuscript notes, and other papers relating to the political and territorial settlement of parts of the Middle East following the First World War. Many of the papers were collected for the attention of the Middle East Committee (later named the Eastern Committee, following the mergence of the Foreign Office's Russia Committee and the interdepartmental Persia Committee) of the War Cabinet. Contributors include officials from the War Office, Foreign Office, Admiralty, and India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , as well as indivduals such as Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence. Correspondence comes from representatives of the French and Italian governments as well as British officials in Cairo and other parts of the Middle East.
The papers deal with plans for the region presuming and following an Allied victory in the First World War and take into consideration the imperial ambitions of the victorious European Powers (France, Italy, Russia, Britain, and the United States) and the multitudinous commitments made by the British to various groups. The plans are based on evolving agreements rooted in the Sykes-Picot, or Asia Minor, Agreement between the British and French of 1916. Regions under consideration include the Hejaz (sometimes written Hedjaz), Syria, Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, Palestine, Armenia, Turkey, the Idrisi state, Yemen, Persia, and Afghanistan. Various matters are covered in the file, but particular focus is given to plans for the Sherifian family of the Hejaz, led by King Husein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī], which impacted upon policy in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine, and the Arabian Peninsula. Other matters include the situation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, wartime commitments to ruling shaikhs in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , the French position in the region, and desiderata of the Government of India for any peace settlement.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (187 folios)
- Arrangement
The file is arranged in chronological order from the front to the back.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front first page with 1, and terminates at the inside back last page with 187; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [152r] (307/380), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/277, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00006c> [accessed 25 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00006c
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00006c">Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎152r] (307/380)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00006c"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0307.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/277
- Title
- Papers on British policy and the Arab movement
- Pages
- 1ar:1av, 1r:14r, 14r:14v, 14v, 22r:59v, 62r:98r, 99v:120v, 125r:133v, 136r:165r, 166r:167r, 167av, 168r:173r, 175r:176v, 178r:187v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎152r] (307/380) Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎152r] (307/380)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0307.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)