Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [132v] (264/290)
The record is made up of 1 file (145 folios). It was created in 7 Jan 1919-7 Dec 1920. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
10
tamian experience in the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
, made him exceedingly doubtful
of the wisdom of encouraging the idea that Abdullah should be the
rider of Mesopotamia. His reluctance had been increase >y v
recent interview with a press correspondent in whuc i ^ u a i
had expressed his opinion on the subject of the Caliphate, lie
would like to sav at this point that he considered it hig i y < esl f'C.. e
that a decision should be taken as to which department o. is
Majesty’s Government was in future to be responsible for Mesopo
tamia. It would be primarily for the department eventually
responsible to consider whether, in the event of any other candidate
being available, a council of regency and a provisional constitution
should be set up in the country pending tlm appearance of a
suitable Arab ruler. What most alarmed him in the 1 rov isional
Government suggested by the Bagdad Committee was the fact that,
as the Chairman had remarked, it was essentially a British and not
an Arab Government. If we once started on this line we should
never get straight. He regarded Colonel V\ ilson s ideal as a
British-Indian ideal. Wdiat he thought vve should work to was a
native State ideal.
The Chairman said that he agreed with a good deal of what
Mr. Montagu said, though he did not quite know what was meant
by the increasingly unfavourable reports about Abdullah, to which
he referred. As the Conference were probably aware, there was a
possibility that Abdullah would shortly come to England. None of
us knew him personally, and it seemed desirable that we should form
our impressions of him direct. His brother, Feisal, had been to
London on more than one occasion, and most of us had been
favourably impressed with him. His own view was that heisal was
an honest man, and likely to become a good ruler. The question to
be decided was what immediate steps should be taken. Mr.
Vansittart, who had been dealing with the question of mandates,
had been summoned to London from Paris, and the whole question
must be discussed with him. Were we to draw up a mandate of
our own for Mesopotamia and leave the French to do the same for
Syria, or not ? Would the French like it if we did ? If we were
to take this line, were we to do it as quick as possible and lay our
proposed mandate before the League of Nations ?
Mr. Montagu suggested that we should evolve an alternative to
the French draft, based on Mesopotamian requirements, and present
it to the French. If they disagreed with it, we could then lay the
two alternatives before the League of Nations. He had himself ^
never seen a mandate, and did not knovy into what detail it should
go, but thought we should make up our minds what we wanted out
of Mesopotamia. He understood that the main desideratum was to
keep other Powers away from the resources of the country and to ♦
ensure that we should have the development of them, especially of
the oil. We should then find out what the people of the country
desired from us, and an agreement should be drafted embodying
these two conclusions.
The Chairman said that, so far as he knew, the form of mandates
(b) and (c) for the late German colonies had taken definite shape.
With regard to mandate (a), he understood that the first draft had
been made by Colonel House. During the French negotiations with
Feisal they had enlarged on this draft, and included in it many
details which had not originally been contemplated. He had known
privately that they were experiencing considerable difficulty in
getting Feisal to agree to their modified mandate though M.
Berthelot had continually referred to it as a harmless document.
The draft which was now before him ran into eighteen pages, and
included elaborate provisions on almost every possible subject. He
♦ asked whether Mr. Montagu suggested that this should now be
thrown overboard and something simpler substituted.
About this item
- Content
This file is composed of papers produced by the Foreign Office's Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs. It consists entirely of printed minutes of meetings of the conference, most of which are chaired by George Curzon.
Those attending include senior representatives of the Foreign Office, the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. (most notably the Secretary of State for India), the War Office, the Admiralty, the Air Ministry, and the Treasury (including the Chancellor of the Exchequer). Other notable figures attending include Harry St John Bridger Philby and Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell.
The meetings concern British policy in the Middle East, and mainly cover the following geographical areas: Mesopotamia, Kurdistan, Trans-Caspia, Trans-Caucasia, the Caspian Sea, Palestine, Persia, Hejaz, and Afghanistan. Some of the meetings also touch on matters beyond the Middle East (e.g. wireless telegraphy in Tibet, ff 79-80).
Recurring topics of discussion include railways (chiefly in relation to Mesopotamia), Bolshevik influence in the Middle East (particularly in Persia and Trans-Caspia), and relations between King Hussein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī] and Ibn Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Fayṣal Āl Sa‘ūd].
Several sets of minutes also contain related memoranda as appendices.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (145 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 145, these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [132v] (264/290), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/275, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000041> [accessed 8 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000041
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000041">Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎132v] (264/290)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000041"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0264.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/275
- Title
- Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:144v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎132v] (264/290) Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎132v] (264/290)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0264.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)