Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [128v] (256/290)
The record is made up of 1 file (145 folios). It was created in 7 Jan 1919-7 Dec 1920. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
2
The position at Tabriz was also disquieting. The British force
there consisted of only two platoons, and was in a precarious position.
They were threatened from the direction of Astara by a numerically
superior force of Cossacks in Tabriz itself. If Tabriz went, Persian
Azerbaijan, the present Persian Ministry, and with them the Anglo-
Persian Agreement, would also go.
Simultaneously the position was acute in the Caucasus States.
The degree of Bolshevik pem tration was not clear, but Azerbaijan
appeared to be in the hollow of their hands. The new Govern
ment at Erivan was rather inexplicably said by Commander Luke
to be more hostile to the Bolsheviks than the late Government.
In any case, it seemed not to have been proved that the Armenian
Bepublic had gone over to the Bolsheviks, though there appeared
to be a chance of this happening in the near future. The news
from Georgia was conflicting, and he only mentioned the situation
in the Caucasus on account of its reflex influence on the Persian
situation.
Turning again to the Persian situation, there was the rather
uncomfortable element of Starosselski. The distribution of the
Russian Cossack forces in Persia at the time when the General Staff
memorandum was written was as follows :—
At Tabriz ... 700 rifles and sabres.
At Astara ... 250 rifles and sabres.
At Teheran ... A,500 rifles and sabres and 12 guns.
At Hamadan... 780 rifles.
Between Hamadan and Ispahan, 500 rifles and
sabres and 4 guns.
©
Starosselski, as the Conference were aware, was playing the old
Russian game. He was out to recover Russia’s old position in
Persia. Three points were especially noteworthy :—
(a.) That having 1,500 rides and sabres and 12 guns at Teheran,
he was local master of the situation.
(b.) That he was said to have th$ Shah behind him.
(c.) That we had not actually broken with him ; we had even
been continuing payment of his subsidy until quite
recently.
Two alternatives had been considered by the authorities on the
spot:—Firstly, to arrest and deport Starosselski and his Russian
officers and to disarm the Cossack division temporarily, accepting
such risks as might result from the liberation of the Cossack detach
ments in the provinces. Secondly, to await the arrival of the Shah,
and meanwhile to inform Starosselski that the British subsidy would
be discontinued in view of the Commission’s report; that he must
reduce his numbers accordingly ; and that the precise manner of
incorporation of the Cossack division and the South Persia rifles
into a new uniform force would be discussed in due course.
So far as pressure could be exercised on the Shah while he was
in Europe, this had been done. His return to Persia, for which he
had strongly pressed, had been made conditional on his supporting
Vossugh, adhering strictly to the Anglo-Persian Agreement
and dealing firmly with Starosselski. It would be unwise to expect
too much from the undertakings that he had given, but at any rate
something had been done. With regard to our own forces the
Conference had decided at the last meeting, on the advice of the
War Office, to retain the detachment at Enzeli as a bluff. The
General Officer Commanding, Norperforce, reported that, while he
considered himself secure at Enzeli from direct attack either by land or
by sea, a Russian advance from Astara against his lines of communica
tion would oblige him to fall back. The War Office recommended
the withdrawal of the Enzeli and Tabriz detachments to Kas-
vin. The Persian Prime Minister had agreed to this course
About this item
- Content
This file is composed of papers produced by the Foreign Office's Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs. It consists entirely of printed minutes of meetings of the conference, most of which are chaired by George Curzon.
Those attending include senior representatives of the Foreign Office, the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. (most notably the Secretary of State for India), the War Office, the Admiralty, the Air Ministry, and the Treasury (including the Chancellor of the Exchequer). Other notable figures attending include Harry St John Bridger Philby and Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell.
The meetings concern British policy in the Middle East, and mainly cover the following geographical areas: Mesopotamia, Kurdistan, Trans-Caspia, Trans-Caucasia, the Caspian Sea, Palestine, Persia, Hejaz, and Afghanistan. Some of the meetings also touch on matters beyond the Middle East (e.g. wireless telegraphy in Tibet, ff 79-80).
Recurring topics of discussion include railways (chiefly in relation to Mesopotamia), Bolshevik influence in the Middle East (particularly in Persia and Trans-Caspia), and relations between King Hussein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī] and Ibn Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Fayṣal Āl Sa‘ūd].
Several sets of minutes also contain related memoranda as appendices.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (145 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 145, these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [128v] (256/290), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/275, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000039> [accessed 12 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000039
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000039">Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎128v] (256/290)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070539236.0x000039"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0256.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/275
- Title
- Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:144v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎128v] (256/290) Papers of the Interdepartmental Conference on Middle Eastern Affairs [‎128v] (256/290)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a9/Mss Eur F112_275_0256.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)