Coll 15/3(1) 'Egypt. Abolition of Capitulations in Montreux Conference and Convention 1937' [‎580r] (1164/1220)

18
1 °f this tegiu e
e nts
t0 Article
Annex: —
ntions i n ^
0n Egyptian
Ptian legislation
lts necessary
n k ot undulv
d Tribunals will
Clal jurisdiction
'nsular Courts. ’
len t will be ^
a PProach tie
the removal of
1 A forei 8®eri
:ed Tribunals as
the Government
w ny opposed to
will collaborate
them by using
,hts in Egypt.
ld impossible to
2 , the Egyptian
the capitulatory
merely that the
cessary for the
> hut also that
as regards the
iate. It would
capacity would
on to foreigners
reigners by the
it no Egyptian
stent with the
■ticular relation
;ners, including
intries to apply
tut personnel,"
am the transfer
ing to “statut
who wish that
isdiction.
the transfer to
■ Courts (which
s of the special
lion of existing
ixed Tribunals,
including the preparation and promulrratinn ,
procedure. It is understood that this Revision will ° f Criminal
matters : — V1S10n Wl11 lncIu de amongst other
(i) The definition of the word “ foreigner ” for ,
jurisdiction of the Mixed Tribunals- h purpose of the future
(ii) The increase of the personnel of the Mi^ ^ , ,
Parquet, which will be necessitated ‘hunals and the Mixed
their jurisdiction; necessita ted by the proposed extension of
fiii) The procedure in the case of nnrdnnc . .
imposed on foreigners and also in connection 6 withTh ° f Se " tences
capital sentences passed on foreigners th the executl0n °f
iULiiS 14.
The present treaty abrogates any existing agreements or other
instrument© whose contmued existence is inconsistent with its
provisions. Should either High Contracting Party so request a 1 st
of the agreements and instruments thus abrogated shall be ’drawn
up in agreement be ween them within six months of the coming into
force of the present treaty. 8
Article 15.
The High Contracting Parties agree that any difference on the
subject of the application or interpretation of the provisions of the
present tieaty xvInch they are unable to settle by direct negotiation
shall be dea t with in accordance with the provisions of the
Covenant of the League of Nations.
Article 10.
At an > time after the expiration of a period of twenty years from
the coming into force of the treaty, the High Contracting Parties
will, at the request of either of them, enter into negotiations with a
view to such revision of its terms by agreement between them as
may be appropriate in the circumstances as they then exist T n
case of the High Contracting Parties being unable to agree upon the
terms of the revised treaty, the difference will be submitted to the
Council of the League of Nations for decision in accordance with
the provisions of the Covenant in force at the time of signature of the
present treaty or to such other person or body of persons for decision
m accordance with such procedure as the High Contracting Parties
ma J agree. It is agreed that any revision of this treaty will provide
for the continuation of the Alliance between the High Contracting
Parties in accordance with the principles contained in Articles 4 5 °
6 and 7. Nevertheless, with the consent of both High Contracting
Parties, negotiations may be entered into at any time after the
expiration of a period of ten years after the coming into force of the
treaty, with a view to such revision as aforesaid.