Coll 28/103 ‘Persia. Perso Russian Relations’ [18v] (36/190)
The record is made up of 1 file (92 folios). It was created in 19 Apr 1940-16 Aug 1946. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
had withheld, of going to call on him. In the course of the visit he captivated
the young Shah and induced him to accept a gift of Soviet tanks and aeroplanes.
The" aircraft—'bombers and fast fighters—were not such as Persia needed, and
the tanks would have been too heavy for any of the bridges in Persia, but the
giftiorse was not examined with indecent curiosity. When, however, the
material was ready to be handed over, the Soviet Ambassador produced a list of
stringent conditions which gave the Persian Government and the Shah good
reason to think that the main object was to secure influence in the Persian army!
and caused them to decline the gift by asking to be allowed to accept it without
conditions. The displeasure of the Soviet Government was shown by the
immediate removal of the ambassador and by the omission of Kalinin to send
the customary telegram to the Shah at the Persian New Year, and comments by
members of the Soviet Embassy show that they considered the refusal of a present
offered by Stalin in person as impiety, not merely ingratitude.
3. The refusal of the war material, however, was a slight set-back to
Russian aims, compared with the rejection in October 1944 of the Soviet demand
for an oil concession. The word “ demand ” is used correctly, for the Soviet
negotiator, M. Kavtoradze, did not submit terms for examination, but demanded
the grant of a concession over a huge area in principle, the minor details such
as payments to be worked out afterwards. The arrogance of this request was
the more striking, in that the British and American companies which were
bidding for a concession in the south at that moment were offering keenly
competitive terms which were being checked for the Persian Government by one
of the best firms of consultants (American) in the world. The area envisaged
in the Soviet demand was large: for prospecting purposes the Soviet Govern
ment wanted rights over 216,000 square kilom. in Northern Azerbaijan, Gilan,
Mazanderan, Semnan and Northern Khorassan; after five years 150,000 square
kilom. would be selected for exploitation; and, of course, the exploiters would be,
not a company, but the Soviet Government—a circumstance which M. Kavtoradze
seemed to think should make a special appeal to the Persian Government. There
is reason to believe that the Soviet Government had in mind something more than
an oil concession—perhaps something which in practice would have resembled
the old chartered companies. To arouse hostility against the Persian Govern
ment, Soviet spokesmen talked of the roads which would have been built and
the agricultural and irrigation projects which would have been undertaken if
the concession had been granted; and one of the Persian delegates at the San
Francisco Conference had to listen to a long harangue by a man attached to the
Soviet delegation, who assured him that, unlike the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company
who did nothing to improve the area where they worked but merely exploited it,
the Soviet oil concern would turn the concession area into a smiling tree-covered
landscape. This could, in fact, be easily done without net loss to the Soviet
Government if the Persian Government had to grant, as it was evidently expected
to do, the blank concession dictated by M. Kavtoradze. On all financial and
economic transactions between Russia and Persia, such as the munitions agree
ment and various barter agreements, Persia is always a heavy loser, and it can
be certain that in concluding an oil concession the Russians would have left
themselves such a margin that they could carry out specious public works and
give their Persian employees conditions better than elsewhere (except perhaps
in the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company) in Persia and so set up a strain which
would serve Russia’s political ends. Besides, with a huge economic concern spread
over 150,000 square kilom. of territory, the Russians could influence the
administration, the courts, and the elections in and near that area, and make
themselves not only all-powerful there, but indirectly a power in the rest of the
country too. But the Soviet proposals were rejected early in October 1944, and,
moreover, the Majlis, in a mood of patriotic excitement, accepted a Bill tabled
by the demagogue, Dr. Musaddiq, on the 2nd December, 1944, prohibiting the
grant of any oil concession and passed it into law forthwith.
4. There still remained one means by which Russia could expect to gain
influence more or less unobtrusively: the elections to the XV Majlis. The law
on the subject is rigid : the elections should have been announced on the
12th September, 1945, and been begun about the 12th December, and even if,
as is permissible and customary, they had run on for three months, they would
have taken place almost entirely before the 2nd March—the last date, under
the tripartite treaty of January 1942, for the evacuation of the Allied troops
from Persia, The Persian Government, however, had had experience enough
with the small band of Tudeh Deputies which Soviet influence had placed m
the Majlis, although only seven in number, with their discipline and the support
About this item
- Content
Correspondence and papers, some marked Most Secret, concerning relations between the Soviet Union and Persia [Iran]. Much of the file concerns the British Government’s concerns about Soviet interference and influence in Persia, particularly at the end and in the aftermath of the Second World War. The file covers: relations between Persia, the Soviet Union and Germany, 1940; the Persian Government’s desire to replace British personnel working in its aviation operations with personnel from the USA, and the proposed use of Persian aerodromes by the Soviet Government, 1940; reports of German infiltration in Persia, 1941; British concerns about an increase in Soviet propaganda in Iran, 1943; the activities of the Anglo-Soviet-Persian Censorship office, 1944; reports that the Soviet Consulate in Ahwaz [Ahvāz] wished to open a ‘propaganda shop’ at Abadan, 1945; notes about the Soviet Union and North Persia, written by the British Ambassador in Tehran, Reader William Bullard (ff 18-22, ff 3-4).
The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (92 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 94; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Coll 28/103 ‘Persia. Perso Russian Relations’ [18v] (36/190), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3514, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100060754745.0x000027> [accessed 26 August 2024]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100060754745.0x000027
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100060754745.0x000027">Coll 28/103 ‘Persia. Perso Russian Relations’ [‎18v] (36/190)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100060754745.0x000027"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00004a/IOR_L_PS_12_3514_0039.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00004a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/3514
- Title
- Coll 28/103 ‘Persia. Perso Russian Relations’
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:2v, 3v:21v, 23r:76v, 78r:94v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence