Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [168r] (335/340)
The record is made up of 1 file (168 folios). It was created in 29 Dec 1930-15 Jun 1933. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
to have special arrangements providing for reciprocal acceptance ol each
other’s direct jurisdiction. I informed him that if he could produce Viceroy’s tel. to
agreements, and if the other parties, on being referred to, acknowledged ^^Juiy 0 !/^^-
their validity, T thought we should be prepared to recognise them . . peatingtei. from
In the light of the protest in question, the wording of the Draft Order in p 0l 2^2/i2
^Council was amended to its present form, under which (Article S of the
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
of 1913) the power conferred by the Order extends
“to the persons and matters following in so far as by Treaty, grant,
usage, sufferance, or other lawful means, IIis Majesty has jurisdiction
in relation to such persons, matters, and things, that is to say :—
(1) 1 British subjects as herein defined within the limits of this Order.
(2) Foreigners with respect to whom the Sheikh of Bahrein has agreed
with His Majesty for, or consented to, the exercise of jurisdiction
by His Majesty.
(3) Bahrein subjects registered in the Political
Agency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent.
as being in the
regular service of British subjects or foreigners; with the proviso
that all cases wherein such Bahrein subjects are concerned shall
be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Part V of this
Order.
(4) The expression ‘person to whom this Order applies’ shall be
construed in accordance with the above three sub-Articles.
(5) '1'he property and all personal or proprietary rights and liabilities
within the said limits of British subjects and of foreigners within
sub-Article (2) and of Bahrein subjects within sub-Article (3),
whether such persons are themselves within or without the limits
of this Order.
(G) British ships and ships belonging to foreigners within sub-
Article (2) with their boats, and the persons and property on board
thereof, or belonging thereto, being within the limits of this Order:
provided that jurisdiction over foreign ships shall not be exercised
otherwise than according to the practice of the High Court in
* England in the exercise of jurisdiction over foreign ships.
(7) If any question arises whether the subjects or citizens of any country,
State, or tribe have or have not been placed under the jurisdiction
of His Majesty by agreement with, or the consent of, the Sheikh
of Bahrein, it shall be inferred by the Court to the Political
Resident, and a certificate under his hand and seal shall be
conclusive on the question and judicial notice shall be taken
thereof.”
10. Part V of the Order, to which reference is made in Article 8 quoted
above, deals with the important class of case, whether civil or criminal, in
which the parties are respectively a Bahrein subject and a person to whom
the Order applies. The procedure laid down in it is as follows : —
“ (a) Criminal.
Article 41.—(1) When a Bahrein subject desires to institute a
complaint against a person to whom this Order applies, or a person
to whom this Order applies desires to institute a complaint against a
Bahrein subject, the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
shall entertain the same, and may—
(a) with the concurrence of the Sheikh of Bahrein, himself hear
and determine it in his District Court, or
(/>) send it to the Joint Court, or
(c) if the defendant is a Mahommedan, refer it to a Kazi for
decision, sending a representative of the
Agency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent.
to record
briefly the proceedings. Such decision, when endorsed by
the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
, shall for all purposes be considered as if
it were that of the District Court.
(2) Kothing in this Article shall prevent the
Political Resident
A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency.
from
exercising the revisory powers possessed by him under Article 4 of
the Convention with Bahrein, dated the 31st May 186l. ,iC
* See para. 1 above.
About this item
- Content
This file contains papers relating to a legal dispute between Yusuf Lutfally Khunji and Shaikh Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, the ruler of Bahrain. The case concerns a joint venture between the aforementioned parties to set up and operate an ice-making plant in Bahrain at a spring owned by Mr. Khunji in 1922. Following the expiration of a five year monopoly on the manufacture and sale of ice in Bahrain, the two parties fell into a dispute on the plant.
The majority of the papers consist of legal correspondence between Mr Khunji's lawyers in Manchester and either the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. in Bahrain or the Financial Advisor to the Ruler of Bahrain, Charles Dalrymple Belgrave. Of note, however, are letters of intervention by the Foreign Minister of Iran through the Persian Legation in London, protesting the treatment of a Persian subject in British protected territory.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (168 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 170; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [168r] (335/340), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3749, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000088> [accessed 26 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000088
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000088">Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎168r] (335/340)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000088"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00013a/IOR_L_PS_12_3749_0336.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00013a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/3749
- Title
- Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory'
- Pages
- 167r:168v, 129r:156v
- Author
- Unknown
- Usage terms
- The copyright status is unknown. Please contact [email protected] with any information you have regarding this item.
![Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎168r] (335/340) Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎168r] (335/340)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00013a/IOR_L_PS_12_3749_0336.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)