Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎41r] (81/340)

cS)
- 10 -
ziiY-iT 1)0611 partnersM x > property’. It wuld appear from these
lv/o statements that the huildinr of the factory An East India Company trading post. was the joint
property of the partners. There seems no reason why Mr.Khunji \
should object to produce the accounts regarding the foundation
of the factory An East India Company trading post. .
Fourthly,ns regards the half share of the profits for
134° (1930). The State have this amount on deposit and are
willing to pay it as soon as the ovaership of the building
is decided, ' hereas i'r.Khunji estimated a year's profits
at about Fs.500 his half share amounts to Hs.1,880 on two
months working.
'fifthly.the .Idviser states the ormenses incurred by Hr.
Dantj 1 ? s ?,gQnt m 134<: and 1349 were Incv^red entirely on his
ov»d initiative^ krd that they cannot accept uny liability for
them&s they Vvero inenrred at a time wheri ohaiidi Ka.ad took
no financial interest in the concern and before the Municipal
ity worked the niachine.
20* The above is a review of the case as it appears from my
files,but obviously since Mr.^unU and his solicitors have
communicated vnth so many persons end since his agent has
resigned end boon reinstated more than once,it is impossible
to say that it is exhaustive. I believe,however,that it
cJX
torches on points of importance. To conclude:-
(V . The \dviser admits that 3s .1,330-being .half the
' ' total profits of 1930 is due to fir.Khunji but #
declines to oay It over until Shaikh Hamad’s claim
to half the " factory An East India Company trading post. building is settled.
(ii). He denies ail responsibility for the claim of
Hs.555/14/9 for expenses made for the time when hr.
Khimji’worked the machine himself-.
CsH) C-G-PRioZ
Political ..gout,Bahrain.