![Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎179v] (358/644)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0358.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg "Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎179v] (358/644)")
Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [179v] (358/644)
The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
security had hitherto prevailed in the district, it was felt that no responsibility
for the murder attached to the authorities and that no claim therefore lay against
the Iranian Government. The firm, however, on their own put forward a request
for an ex cjratia payment to Mr. Fear’s mother, but, though the authorities were
sympathetic, they stated that they did not see how they could grant this request
without creating a precedent. The matter was, therefore, allowed to rest.
(12) Doctors and Midioives.
128. The Ministry for Foreign Affairs replied in January to the notes that
had been addressed to them during the previous year requesting that certain
institutions in the United Kingdom and the Dominions might be added to the
list of medical schools, &c., whose diplomas were recognised by the Iranian
Government. The latter now stated that they would be happy to take steps to
recognise the various medical faculties concerned, but that they would need for
this purpose full details of their curricula. The Iranian Government also
enquired what recognition would be given in the British Empire to diplomas
issued by the Faculty of Medicine in Tehran.
129. The question at first seemed of some urgency as among the diplomas
which the Iranian Government had not hitherto recognised were those of the
Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of
England, and a Church Missionary Society doctor arrived early in the spring
whose qualifications were precisely M.R.C.S., and L.R.C.P. It was thought that
in view of their request for detailed curricula the Iranian Government would
not be ready to issue a licence to this doctor until these had been received; but
they rather surprisingly made no difficulties, and subsequently stated that they
were now prepared to recognise the diplomas of both the above bodies. It was
felt, however, that despite such an illogical proceeding it was still desirable
to furnish them with the full curricula of the then non-recognised bodies in the
United Kingdom, and the matter was accordingly referred to the General Medical
Council, as also the Iranian enquiry as to the attitude which would be adopted in
the United Kingdom towards diplomas of the Faculty of Medicine in Tehran.
The question of the recognition of diplomas issued by certain institutions in the
Dominions, and that of the reciprocal recognition of the I eh ran diploma were
similarly referred to the Dominions concerned.
130. As regards diplomas issued in India, the only institutions hitherto
recognised by the Iranian Government were the Universities of Bombay, Calcutta
and Madras. TTis Majesty s Legation accordingly forwarded to the Ministry for
Foreign Affaiis in June a full list of the universities, State medical faculties and
examination boards, the holders of whose qualifications were entitled to practise
in India. To this the Iranian Government replied by asking which of these
qualifications entitled their holders to practise in the United^ Kingdom The
matter was referred to the Foreign Office and the Government of India and
instructions were received at the end of the year to furnish the Iranian Govern
ment with the required information.
131. The Iranian Government agreed in January to the request put forward
the previous year that doctors temporarily attached to His Majesty's consulates
f!!°d. ie exempted from the necessity of obtaining a medical licence, provided
that their stay did not exceed four months and that their attendance was confined
to consular employees.
(13) Legation Property.
132. Final agreement was reached with the municipality in January with
regard to the terms on which His Majesty’s Legation were prepared to cede
approximately 3,450 square metres of land on the east side of the Legation for
the purposes of street widening. The municipality agreed to nav the sum of
724,470 rials (about £8,000 at the then rate of exchange) and toUrry ou“ a
their own expense the construction of a new watercourse and pavement while
the Legation undertook to demolish the existing wall and bufld anew one 0^
property 63 ^ ° f thiS and a11 ° ther rebuil dihg operations wdhUthe
About this item
- Content
Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).
The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).
Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.
The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (320 folios)
- Arrangement
The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A
Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [179v] (358/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00009f> [accessed 19 November 2024]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00009f
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00009f">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎179v] (358/644)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00009f"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0358.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/3472A
- Title
- Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:91r, 92r:308v, 308ar:308av, 309r:320v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence