Skip to item: of 674
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 2764/1904 Pt 4 'Baghdad Railway: Anglo-Turkish negotiations; proposals of Turkish Govt; status of Kowait' [‎240r] (484/674)

The record is made up of 1 volume (333 folios). It was created in 1911-1912. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

[This DQ c n men t is the Property of His Britaniiic Majesty’s Government.!
EASTERN DEPARTMENT.
■ ■ -
SECRET SERIES.
* [13720]
21APR1911
No. 1.
[April 10.]
Section 2.
(No 105 ) Sir Edward Gre y t0 Sir G - Buchanan.
Sir
’ T ASKTT'n P. + I 1 * , , Foreign Office, April 10, l§ll.
• f -L " i " -i ^ e ^ lc j; ve:l ido r E to-day what were the views of his Government
vith regard to the Bagdad-Gulf section of the Bagdad Railway.
lie told me that, since Germany had renounced the Bagdad-Gulf section and the
On!™ 110 l T& eT a PP®? red t0 between England and Germany alone, the Russian
Go ernment thought that it would be a good demonstration of the co-operation d trois if
they, as well as France, participated m the Bagdad-Gulf section. Co-operation d trois
r^-establSied° PPed ° Ut ° f Slgllt ’ and the Russian Government would like to see it
I entirely agreed with this, but 1 explained to Count Benckendorff our difficulty
with regard to the Bagdad-Gulf section. As a matter of fact, Germany had not
renounced this section ; she had stipulated for a participation in it as great as that of
a P^, 0 + thei ‘ 1 ower . ex 1 ce P t . lurk ey, and the German concessionnaires had reserved the
right to claim an indemnity for loss of profit on kilometric guarantees.
1 also told Count Benckendorff that we had not yet sent in our reply to the
proposals which the Turkish Government had made to us. When we did reply we
should certainly point out that the position which they now put before us was quite
different to that which Djavid Bey had suggested last summer as a possible way of
meeting our views. Djavid Bey had then asked us whether we thought that a settle
ment c o ul d_be reached if Turkey had a free hand with regard to the Bagdad-Gulf
section. We had replied that this might provide a basis for a settlement, provided
that, if the participation of foreign capital was invited, our participation was in pro-
portion to our trade ; this would give ns about 60 per cent. In any case, it would be
difficult to reconcile British public opinion to a bargain unless we had at least 50 per
cent. But, m the new circumstances created by the German agreement with Turkey,
if we had 50 per cent., Germany was also to have 50 per cent., Turkey would drop out
of financial paiticipation, and the question would still be one to be discussed between
us and Germany.
. France, I understood from M. Gambon, wished to secure railway advantages in
regions quite different from that of the Bagdad Railway ; and she would participate in
the latter railway only if we desired her to do so, for she did not look upon it as her
affair.
My view was that Russia should make her bargain as she had begun to do at
Potsdam. France should make her own stipulations with regard to the matters in
which she was most interested. We ourselves should make the best terms we could
about the Bagdad-Gulf section. I hen, when we were all three ready, we would
simultaneously agree to the increase of the Turkish customs dues. Simultaneous
agreement of this sort would have an excellent effect.
Count Benckendorff said that the fact that Germany had not unconditionally i
renounced the Bagdad-Gulf section made a considerable difference. He thought the !
Russian proposal was founded on the assumption that Germany was out of the question. I
The Russian desire was to help us, and therefore their proposal w^ould not hold if the
question was one between us and Germany alone.
He thought, however, that if it was ultimately decided to have French co-operation,
Russia should come in too, for the participation of Russia as well as France, entailing
the division of the railway section into five shares instead of four, might just turn the
balance in our favour.
I agreed that if France came in it would be desirable that Russia should come in
also, and if the negotiations took a turn in this direction I would bear the point in
mind. Meanwhile, I thought it better to leave the question open, and I promised to
let Count Benckendorff know how the negotiations progressed. It might be that, as a
result of the terms which Germany had made with Turkey, the negotiations would
revert to an attempt on our part to arrange a settlement with Germany and Turkey
alone as the only way in which to get the large share in the Gulf section which British
public opinion expected.
[1969 k—2]
I am, &c.
E. GREY.

About this item

Content

The volume comprises telegrams, despatches, correspondence, memoranda, newspaper cuttings, maps and notes, relating to negotiations over the proposed Berlin to Baghdad Railway in the period 1911-1912.

The correspondence concerns three broad topics:

  • Anglo-Turkish negotiations
  • proposals of the Turkish Government
  • the status of Kuwait.

The discussion in the volume relates to the economic, commercial, political and military considerations impinging on British strategy for these international negotiations.

Further discussion surrounds the Draft Report of the Standing Sub-Committee of the Committee of Imperial Defence.

The principal correspondents in the volume include Sir Edward Grey, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs ,and John Morley, 1st Viscount Morley, Lord President of the Council.

Extent and format
1 volume (333 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 2764 (Baghdad Railway) consists of five volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/56-60. The volumes are divided into five parts with each part comprising one volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 335; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 2764/1904 Pt 4 'Baghdad Railway: Anglo-Turkish negotiations; proposals of Turkish Govt; status of Kowait' [‎240r] (484/674), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/59, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100055625146.0x000055> [accessed 5 April 2025]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100055625146.0x000055">File 2764/1904 Pt 4 'Baghdad Railway: Anglo-Turkish negotiations; proposals of Turkish Govt; status of Kowait' [&lrm;240r] (484/674)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100055625146.0x000055">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x000390/IOR_L_PS_10_59_0484.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x000390/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image