Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [88r] (175/248)
The record is made up of 1 file (122 folios). It was created in 21 Jun 1942-15 Mar 1946. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
7
(
4
In April, at his instigation attacks were made on Persian garrisons in the Janiki
country sufficiently close to the oilfields at Masjidi Suleiman and Haft Kel to
cause a temporary anxiety for their safety.
26. At the end of last year General Headquarters, Paiforce, were concerned
about the safety of the Bushire-Shiraz road, which it was, at that time, intended
to use to a greater extent for the transport of supplies to Russia. Although there
been no serious interference with our military traffic, a series of minor rob-
p ties and hold-ups had hampered the work being done by our engineers on the
improvement and maintenance of the road, and had created some anxiety among
labourers and transport drivers. It was evident that there would be no real
security on the road until the Persian Government had established some respect
for their authority in Pars, and that this could not be achieved as long as Nasir
Qashgai continued in defiance. The Persian forces in Pars were demoralised after
a long period of inaction and were immobile through lack of transport. It was
agreed with General Headquarters, Paiforce, that the Persian Government should
be urged to take more decisive measures to ensure the security of the road and to
re-establish their authority over the Qashgai tribes. General Headquarters,
I aiforce, undertook to supply the minimum amount of mechanical transport
considered essential for the operations, to provide basic rations, blankets and
greatcoats for the gendarmerie protecting the road, in the hope that this would
lead to a more efficient performance of their duties, and to send to Shiraz a small
staff of British officers for liaison with the Persian troops, and the supervision of
the use and maintenance of this transport and the issue of the rations. The
Persian Government decided to appoint General Shahbakhti, an officer of the old
school with a reputation to maintain for courage, energy and astuteness in dealing
with the tribes, with full civil and military powers in Pars. The mere announce
ment of his appointment had on the tribal situation an immediate effect which,
however, wore off as weeks passed in inaction.
27. There may at first have been some justification for this inaction in the
delay in the arrival of the transport promised by Paiforce, without which, it is
probably true, General Shahbakhti was unable to act; but the delav was unfortu
nate in that the pro-German party, whose tool Nasir was, headed by the Deputy
Nowbakht, had time to work up a considerable agitation in Parliament and press
in favour of Nasir and against “ fratricidal warfare.” That we had pressed the
Persian Government to undertake these operations, that we were providing assist
ance and that British officers were in Pars to see that they were carried out was
well known, and the agitation inevitably assumed a strongly anti-British bias.
Only traitors, it was said, would lend themselves to British designs against the
patriotic Na.sir, whose father had so successfully foiled all British attempts to
take possession of Pars. This agitation had a harmful effect on the never very
firm decision of the Persian Government, which quickly communicated itself to
General Shahbakhti and the forces in Pars; and it was not until the end of May—
General Shahbakhti having arrived in Shiraz in February—that he allowed him
self to be persuaded that the Government really meant him to act. After an
initial set-back the first stage of the operations, of which the object was the
occupation of Firuzabad and other important places in the area dominated by
Nasir, was successfully completed by the 12 th June.
28. As was expected, as soon as it was realised that the Government really
meant business, organised opposition rapidly disintegrated, and Nasir, with an
unknown but probably not large number of followers and, according to local
reports, two Germans, is now in hiding in the hills. The Persian Air Force is
using the landing ground at Farrashband prepared bv Nasir and the Germans for
the arrival of German aircraft. Un less th e Pers ian authorities mishandle thing's
bajly the power and prestige of Nasir should now be definitelv broken; sporadic
raiding may be expected to occur for some time yet, but if the Persian Govern
ment show even a moderate degree of firmness and statesmanship they have an
opportunity of making a settlement with the Qashgai tribes that would induce
them to be well-behaved for some time. The matter will soon be of less import-
ance to our military interests as it is not intended to use the Bushire-Isfahan
road for the transport of supplies to Russia after July, but from the economic
point of view the restoration of order in tribal areas is of great importance.
29. By their successful challenge of Nasir’s bluff the Persian Government \
has restored something of its lost prestige among the tribes of the South and the
effect is already apparent. If the present Prime Minister, who also holds the
portfolio of the Interior, could spare time from his manoeuvrings to keep himself
in power, to consider how best advantage can be taken of the present favourable
position vis-a-vis the tribes, he has the opportunity of establishing better relations
with them which might go far towards eliminating the causes of tribal unrest. Y Tc
- k.
i \ rid
OuIm ^ ' •
About this item
- Content
This file consists of miscellaneous dispatches relating to internal affairs in Persia [Iran] during the occupation of the country by British and Soviet troops. The file begins with references to an Anglo-Soviet-Persian Treaty of Alliance, signed in January 1942, which followed the Anglo-Soviet invasion of the country in August-September 1941.
Most of the dispatches are addressed by His Majesty's Minister (later Ambassador) at Tehran (Sir Reader William Bullard) to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Anthony Eden). The dispatches discuss political, financial and economic affairs in Persia, as well as issues regarding road and rail transport (for the transportation of foodstuffs), food supplies and press censorship,
Related matters of discussion include the following:
- British concerns regarding the extent and effect of Axis propaganda in Persia and the Persian Government's response to it.
- Relations between the Shah [Muhammad Reza Khan] and successive Persian prime ministers, and the power and influence of the Majlis deputies.
- Anglo-Persian relations, and British concerns regarding Soviet policy in Persia.
- The Persian press's response to the Allied occupation.
- The Tehran conference in late November 1943, attended by Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin and Franklin D Roosevelt, who were also present at a dinner at the British Legation, held in celebration of Churchill's 69th birthday (also discussed is the naming of three streets in Tehran, after Churchill, Stalin, and Roosevelt respectively).
- The tribal situation in Persia.
- The raising of the status of the British Legation in Tehran to that of British Embassy in February 1943.
- The United States' interests in Persia.
- The status of Polish evacuees in Persia.
- The work of the British Council in Persia.
- The question of the withdrawal of Allied troops from Persia.
The file includes a divider which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence (folio 1).
- Extent and format
- 1 file (122 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [88r] (175/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/564, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100042321849.0x0000b0> [accessed 7 April 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321849.0x0000b0
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321849.0x0000b0">Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [‎88r] (175/248)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321849.0x0000b0"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000517.0x00011a/IOR_L_PS_12_564_0175.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000517.0x00011a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/564
- Title
- Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).'
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:8v, 10r:123v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence