![‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’ [‎23r] (45/58)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000282.0x000262/IOR_R_15_2_1875_0045.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg "‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’ [‎23r] (45/58)")
‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’ [23r] (45/58)
The record is made up of 1 file (27 folios). It was created in 30 Jun 1937-24 Apr 1938. It was written in English and Arabic. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
0 °Ll-
Letter No.292 dated 16th April 1938 from the
residency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India.
Agent,
Sharjah, to the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
, Bahrain.
Reference your letter No.106-3/10/7 dated 6 th April 1938.
./hen l received your letter Kishandas was at Bahrain whence
he left for -J-ndia and until now he has not returned.
2. As regards the buildings I asked 8 experienced merclients
among whom were three British subjects to assess their value.
They have valued the building and its appurtenance which are
in partnership between both parties for Rs.3250/-. 1 enclose
herewith a copy of my letter No.70 dated 20 th January 1938 to
the Committee and their answer dated 22nd January is also attache
Owing to the absence of Lishandas in -kidia and there is no one
to represent him here it has not been possible to do anything
further in this matter.
Jsual Ending.
Letter ^o.70 dated 20th January 1938 from the
Residency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India.
Agent Bharjah to the the merchants.
I woild be grateful if you would let me know the value of
the building and its appurtenance belonging to Kishandas and his
partner situated at u 9 bai.
Reuter dated 22nd January 1938 from the mere lants to the
Residency
An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India.
Agent, Sharjah.
A.C
A.C
Jsual ^ding
We 1 ' iave 1 'eceived your letter r3ated 20th January asking us to
assess uhe value ox the building and its aspurtiiance belonging
to uisnandas and his partner situated at Mebai. In compliance
v/ith your order we looked into the matter and the result is as
oai. in compliance
under:
Amarah (building)
Appurtfnanc
^s. 250
" 750/-
Rs.3250/-
About this item
- Content
The file contains correspondence relating to a debt recovery claim made in 1937 by Manibai, the widow of the Indian merchant Seth Dhamanmal Jethanand. Her claim is against her husband’s former business partner Seth Kishinchand (also spelt Kishandas) Nathamal, merchant of Dubai, regarding her entitlement to rental income from a jointly owned property in Dubai. The correspondence contains three petitions from Manibai, together with a copy of an agreement made at Karachi in 1933 between her son Chaturbhujdas (also spelt Chaturbhuj) Dhamanmal and Seth Kishinchand Nathamal, which contains the terms of a new lease for the property. Also included in the file are two letters from Seth Kishinchand Nathamal to Chaturbhujdas Dhamanmal at Karachi and to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. at Bushire respectively. There are other letters, in both English and Arabic, from the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. Agent at Sharjah who was charged with investigating the claim, to the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. at Bahrain and also to a committee of local merchants. The committee’s valuation of the property, in Arabic, is also present in the file.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (27 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 29; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 2-26; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled.
- Written in
- English and Arabic in Latin and Arabic script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’ [23r] (45/58), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/2/1875, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100042028581.0x00002e> [accessed 28 March 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042028581.0x00002e
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042028581.0x00002e">‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’ [‎23r] (45/58)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042028581.0x00002e"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000282.0x000262/IOR_R_15_2_1875_0045.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000282.0x000262/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/R/15/2/1875
- Title
- ‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’
- Pages
- 23r:23v, 26r:26v
- Author
- Ratanchand Tarachand
- Usage terms
- The copyright status is unknown. Please contact [email protected] with any information you have regarding this item.
- Reference
- IOR/R/15/2/1875
- Title
- ‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’
- Pages
- 23r:23v, 26r:26v
- Author
- Vallabdas, Viroomal xx Valabdas, Virumal
- Usage terms
- The copyright status is unknown. Please contact [email protected] with any information you have regarding this item.
- Reference
- IOR/R/15/2/1875
- Title
- ‘File B/10-7 CLAIM OF MANIBAI WIFE OF DHAMANMAL AGAINST SETH KISHANCHAND NATHAMAL OF DUBAI’
- Pages
- 23r:23v, 26r:26v
- Author
- Ibrahim Galadari
- Usage terms
- The copyright status is unknown. Please contact [email protected] with any information you have regarding this item.