File 4880/1913 Pt 2 'Turco-Persian Frontier Commission: protocol of 1913' [276r] (419/499)
The record is made up of 1 item (248 folios). It was created in 1913. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
[This Docmnent is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.!
[B]
PERSIA.
•^CONFIDENTIAL.
r
« e
[April 9.]
Section 1,
[16221] No. 1.
Sir G. Lowther to Sir Edward Grey.—(Received April 9.)
(No. 271.)
Sir, Constantinople, April 5, J913.
AS I had the honour to report to you in my telegram No. 181 of the 3 rd instant,
on the subject of the Turco-Persian frontier, the Russian Ambassador has succeeded
in eliciting from the Porte a reply to his note of the 9th ( 22 nd) August last, and
M. de Griers has been so good as to communicate to me the text thereof.
The Turkish reply, copy of which is enclosed herewith, consists of a note from the
Minister for Foreign Affairs containing a qualified acceptance of the Russian demands,
and an annex showing the cession of territory in the Zohah districts, which Turkey
desires to obtain by way of compensation.
The greater part of the note is occupied with the modification of the line north of
latitude 36°, which are desired by Turkey, and as they do not concern us directly I
need say no more than that they do not appear to be of much importance, and that
M. de Giers believes that it should not be difficult to come to terms about them. In
its eighth paragraph the note urges that in consideration of the complaisance shown
bv Turkey in respect of the frontier north of latitude 36°, certain concessions (described
in the annex) should be made to Turkey in the southern parts of the frontier, i.e.,
between 36° and 32° latitude north, and the Porte hopes that Russia will use her
infiuence at Tehran to induce Persia to agree to these concessions. The Porte is ready
to confide the actual delimitation of the new frontier, as described in the annex, to a
joint Turco-Persian commission, to be formed in the coming summer. In conclusion,
the note states that in the event of Persia not agreeing to the arrangement proposed
concerning the Zohah district, the Porte would be obliged to “ maintenir comme par le
passe fetat de choses et la situation existants sur toute 1 ’etendue de la frontiere.”
This last phrase is ambiguous, but I think that it can be taken to imply merely
that in the event contemplated Turkey would abandon the attempt to come to a
definite solution of the frontier question, and would be content “ comme par le passe ”
to leave matters in the same unsettled and unsatisfactory condition as has existed for
the last seventy years; in other words, the Porte believes that it can trust to Russia’s
(and our own) anxiety to see this question laid to rest, to induce her (and us) to put on
Persia the pressure requisite to bring her to accept these cessions in Zohab.
The annex, after attempting to justify the Turkish demands for cessions in Zohab
on historical grounds, goes on, in paragraph 4, to explain that as, according to the
Potsdam agreement, Kasri Shirin is to be the terminus of the future Russian railway
which is to “ traverse Azerbaijan,” Turkey is willing to cede that village as also the
town of Zohab to Persia, and “as compensation” should receive a rectification of
frontier and the principle that both north and south of Zohab the territories occupied
by Sunni tribes be ceded to Turkey. The annex then describes the new frontier to
be traced in accordance with the above principle, and closes with the observation that
the annual migration of these Sunni tribes must be regulated so as to prevent their
traversing Persian territory.
I have found it somewhat difficult to follow the line proposed by Turkey on the
map, but M. Minorsky, who was present at the interview, between M. de Giers and the
Grand Vizier on the 27th ultimo, when the latter explained his proposals verbally, has
been good enough to trace roughly for me the more important parts of it on sheet 5
of the identic map, and I venture to hope that the accompanying copy^ of it with the
line shown in red will be of use.* (The remaining part of the Turkish line can easily be
identified on sheet 6 .)
Starting from the north it will be noted that whereas as far as the Kuretu River
the line verbally indicated to the Russian Ambassador by the Grand Vizier (see my
telegram No. 169 of the 28th ultimo) was almost identical with the frontier suggested
* Not reproduced.
[2874 i —1]
/ a .
• A
About this item
- Content
Correspondence, reports and maps relating to the 1913 Turco-Persian Frontier Commission, and the production of the Protocole relative à la Délimitation turco-persane, signé à Constantinople le 4 (17) Novembre, 1913 .
The primary correspondents are: HM Consul-General at Teheran (Sir Walter Beaupre Townley); HM Consul-General at Constantinople; HM Vice-Consul at Kashr-i Shirin (E B Soane); the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department; the Turkish Minister for Foreign Affairs (Said Halim); the Russian Consul-General in Baghdad (M Orlof); the Russian Ambassador to the UK (Count Von Benckendorff); HM Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Sir Edward Grey); and Albert Charles Wratislaw, head of the British section of the Commission.
The file opens with correspondence regarding reported Turkish military build-up in Kasr-i Shirin [Qaṣr-e Shīrīn], disturbances on the Baghdad-Kermaāshāh route, local raids by Persian and Turkish tribesmen, possible concessions to Turkey in the Zohab [Zohāb] district, and the difficulty of reaching an agreement which would be acceptable to Sunni and Shia tribes in the Zohab region. A map of the Zohab region is included at folio 305.
The bulk of the file concerns arrangements for the Frontier Commission, discussing: the push for a settlement; the composition of the British, Russian, Turkish and Persian commissions; the need to use surveying and triangulation to improve on pre-existing, inaccurate maps; the wording of the internal rules [ Règlement Intérieur ] to govern the Commission; arrangements over work to be conducted by the northern and southern sections of the Commission; and arrangements to preserve the rights of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in regions to be transferred to Turkey.
Key items:
Folios 224-29 Declaration regarding the frontier, signed by Sir Edward Grey and I Hakky Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , with four accompanying maps:
- Map No 1, Sketch Map showing Turco-Persian Frontier West and South of Hawizeh [Howeyzeh];
- Map No 2, Sketch Map of Muhammareh [Khorramshar] to indicate the Turco-Persian Boundary;
- Map No 3, Sheet No I, Map of Shatt-Al-'Arab & Bahmanshir [Rūdkhāneh-ye Bahmanshīr] including Muhammareh [Khorramshar] & 'Abbádán I [Ābādān];
- Map No 4, Sheet No II, Map of Shatt-Al-'Arab & Bahmanshir, including Muhammareh & 'Abbádán I.
Folios 68-87 Copy of the Protocole relative à la Délimitation turco-persane, signé à Constantinople le 4 (17) Novembre, 1913, plus: additional copies of the four maps detailed above; Annex (A), Règlement intérieur de la Commission de Délimitation de la Frontière turco-persane ; Annex (B) Statement by the Ottoman Government pledging to maintain, within the territories granted by Persia to Turkey, the rights and obligations granted to the Anglo-Persian Oil Company Ltd by the Persian Imperial Government under the Convention of 28 May, 1901; also included are notes on the meetings of the frontier delegates at Constantinople, 4-9 November, written by the British Commissioner, Albert Charles Wratislaw.
Folio 67 is a collection header sheet, giving the subject heading and a list of correspondence references found within the part, listed by year.
- Extent and format
- 1 item (248 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in rough chronological order from the rear to the front of the section
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 4880/1913 Pt 2 'Turco-Persian Frontier Commission: protocol of 1913' [276r] (419/499), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/430/2, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100040878371.0x00009d> [accessed 10 November 2024]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100040878371.0x00009d
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100040878371.0x00009d">File 4880/1913 Pt 2 'Turco-Persian Frontier Commission: protocol of 1913' [‎276r] (419/499)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100040878371.0x00009d"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000145/IOR_L_PS_10_430_0572.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000145/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/430/2
- Title
- File 4880/1913 Pt 2 'Turco-Persian Frontier Commission: protocol of 1913'
- Pages
- 67r:69v, 74r:77v, 79r:80v, 86r:102v, 104r:110v, 112r:116v, 117v:128v, 130r:134r, 138r:140v, 141v:151v, 154r:178r, 180r:211v, 213r:224v, 226r:251v, 253r:269v, 271r:272v, 274r:276r, 279r:305v, 306v:315v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence