Skip to item: of 248
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎89v] (178/248)

The record is made up of 1 volume (122 folios). It was created in 1906-1918. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

172
V
(100 beds) complete ; (c) No. 57 Indian Stationary Hos
pital (200 beds) complete ; (d) No. 2 Field Ambulance.
2 British and 3 Indian Sections, (e) No. 4 Field Ambul
ance. 1 British and 2 Indian Sections complete; (/)
No. 106 Field Ambulance. 1 British and 3 Indian
Sections, (g) No. 9 Advanced Depot of Medical Stores
complete.
(a), (b), (c), and (e) were in Kut when we arrived.
(a) had 2 medical officers and 2 assistant surgeons.
(b) had 2 medical officers, l assistant surgeon and 2
sub-assistant surgeon.
(c) had 2 medical officers and 2 sub-assistant surgeons.
(d) had 5 medical officers, 3 assistant surgeons and 3
sub-assistant surgeons; much of its equipment was
abandoned at Ctesiphon. One medical officer died, and
1 sub-assistant surgeon was killed during the siege.
(e) had 3 medical officers, 1 assistant surgeon, and 2
sub-assistant surgeons.
(/) had 4 medical officers, 3 assistant surgeons and 2
sub-assistant surgeons; some of its equipment was aban
doned at Ctesiphon.
53. No. 2 Field Ambulance received the sick and
wounded of the 16th and 17th Brigades, No. 106 of the
18th Brigades, No. 4 of the 30th Brigade and Divisional
troops : the British General Hospital admitted the more
severe cases occurring in British Units, and all British
Officers, the Indian General and Stationary Hospitals
the wors3 cases of all Indian units and followers.
54. The British General Hospital was expanded to
200 beds from December 4th, 1915.
Wounded and sick Arabs were mainly treated in No. 106
Field Ambulance, but in emergencies were treated in the
nearest hospital.
55. On December 8th, I issued an order that the “ field
ambulances are to admit all the slight and less severe
cases of sickness and wounds.” With regard to the sick
this could not be adhered to completely, for when the
General Hospitals became congested the field ambulances
had to retain many cases of serious illness.
56. h ormally the above-named medical units are
eq nipped and staffed to deal with a total of 650 patients.
The daily average number of sick and wounded under
treatment was 1,351. The General and Stationary
Hospitals were short of their usual number of medical
officers and medical subordinates. A large part of the
equipment of Nos. 2 and 106 Field Ambulances had to be
relinquished during the withdrawal from Ctesiphon.
57. The staff attached to these units included :—
18 Medical Officers (1 died).
10 Assistant Surgeons (1 died)
11 Sub-Asst. Surgeons (1 killed).
As five medical officers, two assistant surgeons ana
one sub-assistant surgeon of corps units were killed or
wounded at Ctesiphon their places had to be partly filled
from the above staff. During the siege one medical
officer (regimental) was killed and one died, one assistant
surgeon (regimental) was killed and one died, and one
sub-assistant surgeon was killed, while on an average
20 per cent, of the medical officers and medical subordinates
were on the sick list, so that the work thrown on the re
mainder left for duty was exceedingly severe and carried
out under exceptional difficulties. On January 23rd,
1916, we had eight medical officer on the sick list, and
on the 28th of the same month, r. ne. Seldom had we
less than four. Some of the medical officers and
subordinates previously attached to the different units
were, just before the siege began, sent down river with
convoys of wounded after the I tie of Ctesiphon, and
their services lost to the Defence.
58. The perpetual sniping on the part of the enemy and
his daily but irregular shell fire necessitated the admission
of the wounded into the hospitals at all hours of the day
and night; these cases had on several occasions to be
dressed and operated on during the enemy’s bombard
ment.
59. There was a constant interchange of medical
officers and subordinates in the hospitals. When work of
one got very heavy one or more medical officers were
transferred temporarily from the field ambulances, whilst
medical officers of corps units gave their services for
several hours daily.
60. The menial establishment was insufficient. We
obtained several British privates to act as cooks and
nursing orderlies in the hospitals, and Indian soldiers to act
as ward orderlies and help in the cooking; convalescents
also assisted in these functions.
The shortage of sweepers was made good from brigades,
the units of which h&d under existing circumstances
a superabundance.
61. Statement Showing Number of Personnel by Classes Attached to Medical Units of 6th Division in
Kut-al-Amarah on April 26th, 1916.
-C CQ
t: u
^ GO
3 c
-M GO
” §
U GO
° ^
U
CO
U .
9 GO
K. F-
o
Unit.
;■§ 8
K S
.1 a
GO
<2 3
<! 02
3 3
m m
m c«
&
§ fe
Ps 02
00 ^
ce
Pi
2
^ o
o
£ o
^ ffl 6
Arm
Hospi
Corps
Supp
and
Transp
Total.
No. 2 Field Ambulance
Personnel
4
3
2
1
3
5
3
200
18
23
262
No. 4 Field Ambulance ...
... 3
1
2
1
1
4
54
20
2
88
No. IU6 Field Ambulance
... 4
3
2
_
_
2
5
94
13
21
144
British General Hospital ...
... 2
2

_
__
23
14
18
14
73
Indian General Hospital ...
... 2
1
2
_
I
_
10
16
28
60
Indian Stationary Hospital
... 2
-
2
-
4
-
8
23
5
25
69
Total
... 17
10
10
2
9
34
26
401
74
113
696
Location of the Medical Units.
62. As soon as we reached Kut I went round the town
to select buildings for the hospitals as the position of the
General Hospitals and field ambulances was dangerous.
There were only two large places suitable for hospitals,
the Serai and the Covered Bazar. The Serai, situated
at the North-West angle of the town, was directly exposed
to both rifle and gun fire. The Covered Bazar, which
could roughly hold about 1,000 patients, was selected
for the British and Indian General Hospitals, the Indian
Stationary Hospital and No. 106 Field Ambulance. It
took 200 men two days to clean it up and make it habit
able for patients
63. The four great defects of the Covered Bazar as a
hospital were : (a) Leakage to a certain extent during
the rain ; this was periodically attended to by the engi
neers ; (6) the thoroughfares became converted into a puddle
after each heavy shower; remedied by partial rough pav
ing with brick; (c) dust in dry weather, and (d) exposure
to enemy shell-fire.
64. The accommodation of all the medical units was
indifferent, but it was the best that could be provided, and
it was to some degree satisfactory that all the sick and
wounded could be billeted throughout the siege.
Anterior to the commencement of the siege the British
and Indian General Hospitals were in reed and mat huts
supplemented by tents and located to the North-East
of the town: the Indian Stationary Hospital in tents in
the same vicinity; No. 4 Field Ambulance was encamped
in an orange grove to the North of the town, and close
to it was No. 9 Advanced Depot of Medical Stores. These
positions were very exposed to the enemy’s fire.
65. On arriving in Kut, the field ambulances of the 6th
Division were encamped in the orchards between the

About this item

Content

A signed proof, folios 1-100, plus additional material, folios 101-124. The cover bears the signature of Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State. The report has been annotated in blue pencil at various points.

Contents:

  • 'Part I. Preface.
  • 'Part II. Origin of Mesopotamia [Iraq] Expedition.'
  • 'Part III. Advance from Basra to Kurna.'
  • 'Part IV. The Advance to Amara [Al-'Amārah] and Kut [Al-Kūt].'
  • 'Part V. Correspondence and Telegrams as to Advance on Baghdad.'
  • 'Part VI. The Advance from Kut to Ctesiphon.'
  • 'Part VII. Operations for Relief of Kut.'
  • 'Part VIII. Armament, Equipment, Reinforcements, &c.'
  • 'Part IX. Transport.'
  • 'Part X. Medical Breakdown.'
  • 'Part XI. Causes Contributing to the Errors of Judgement and Shortcomings of Responsible Authorities.'
  • 'Part XII. Findings and Conclusions. Recommendations.'
  • 'Separate Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP.'
  • 'Appendix I. Vincent-Bingley Report.'
  • 'Appendix II. Memorandum by Sir Beauchamp Duff.'
  • 'Appendix III. Colonel Hehir's Account of the Siege of Kut-el-Amara.'

Additional material:

  • Folio 101. Manuscript note [by Arthur Hirtzel] on net military expenditure.
  • Folios 102-109. Copy of the East India (Army Administration), Further Papers regarding the Administration of the Army in India , 1906.
  • Folios 110-115. Manuscript notes, titled 'Suggested redraft & amplification of second half of parag 1' [unknown hand].
  • Folio 116. A clipping from the Daily Telegraph , Wednesday 4 July 1917, featuring an article titled 'Mesopotamia. Ex-Viceroy's Statement. The Medical Breakdown.'
  • Folios 117-124. An expanded typescript version of Hirtzel's manuscript notes (folio 101).
Extent and format
1 volume (122 folios)
Arrangement

A table of contents can be found at folio 4v.

An index can be found at folios 93-97.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 110-115; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence. The volume comprises a stitched pamphlet, and other stitched and loose-leaf material.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎89v] (178/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x0000b3> [accessed 21 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x0000b3">'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [&lrm;89v] (178/248)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x0000b3">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/IOR_L_PS_20_257_0180.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image