Skip to item: of 248
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎49r] (97/248)

The record is made up of 1 volume (122 folios). It was created in 1906-1918. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

PART X.—MEDICAL BREAKDOWN.
95
G. Medical Findings and Recommendations.
were spasmodic, and in no case had these officers power to give orders or settle impor
tant questions without further reference to Simla or Delhi. Further, all power being
concentrated at Headquarters, the ruling authorities deprived themselves of the
value of being in constant touch with those going to,or returning from .Mesopotamia.
If it was true as alleged that the Headquarter Staff at Simla were tied to their secre
tariat work there, the Bombay Government was on the spot and common-sense would
have suggested the delegation of authority to a Government so conveniently situated.
(c) At the Port of Embarkation the embarkation staffs should be responsible for
seeing that the equipment and personnel of each medical unit should not be separated
in different vessels, but embarked together in the same vessel. This rule was frequently
neglected at Bombay.
(d) There should be an immediate and general improvement in the whole standard
of comfort, and accommodation in the hospitals for British troops in India. Surgeon-
General MacNeece stated “ even now there are practically not more than 2 or 3 up-to-
date military hospitals in India.” We are glad to note that the new war hospitals
in Bombay are reported by the Yincent-Bingley Commission as bearing favourable
comparison with any similar hospitals in the United Kingdom. This shows what can
be done in India when there is impulse to reform. We think it discreditable to the
Indian Government that the general standard of hospitals in India should fall below
the standard of efficiency now demanded in Military Hospitals at home. To assist in
reforming this state of things, we think that the R.A.M.C. or a corps on similar lines
should be available for service in all British Hospitals in India, and that a better and
more complete female nursing service should also be organised.
(e) As regards the medical treatment of Indian troops, no time should be lost in
substituting a Station Hospital system for the present regimental treatment, “ I doubt,”
one I.M.S. witness says to us, “ whetfier you gentlemen would consider that the Sepoys’
hospitals in peace time in India are hospitals at all.” Sir Havelock Charles described
them as “ a disgrace to the Government of India.” Surgeon-General MacNeece
states “ there are no well-equipped operating theatres, X-ray rooms, laboratories, etc.”
and Sir William Babtie,“ they are so bad that I think it would be necessary to reform
them ab initio” The new Indian hospitals should be staffed by enlisted personnel
of all ranks, and should be used for building up trained reserves of menial establish
ments in peace time.
(/) All deficiencies usually allowed to prevail in peace-time in the mobilisation
equipment of general hospitals should be made good. Sir W. Babtie told us that of
the general hospitals in India, “ Twelve were supposed to be mobilisable, but only
four were complete in all the different Departments of supply.” All such equipment
should be stored and in readiness, and inspected, as is done now in the case of field
ambulances, casualty clearing hospitals and stationary hospitals.
{g) Base Depots of Medical Stores should be reintroduced into the Indian Field
Service organisation and kept ready for mobilisation.
(h) At the outset of every campaign there should be provided a separate superior
sanitary organisation and staff charged with the arrangements for preserving and safe
guarding the health of the fighting troops, and responsible to the Principal Medical
Officer of the force, but otherwise entirely separate from the organisation for the care
of the sick and wounded This implies a formation in peace time of an adequate
reserve of sanitary officers enlisting in it, if necessary, the services of ’ specialists in
civil employment.
{i) The Field Service Ration should receive very careful reconsideration and altera
tion in the light of experience in Mesopotamia. This especially applies to the rations
for Indian troops. The War Office Sanitary Committee found that even “ the improved
ration ” sanctioned as late as October last was deficient in many respects.
The above are only some of the defects revealed by our investigations, but they
are sufficient to prove the necessity for an urgent, and thorough reform by the Indian
Government of the whole system upon which their medical services are based, and
under which they are controlled. Sir Alfred Keogh, whose administration at the War
Office as Director-General, Army Medical Services, has been very successful during
this war, at the conclusion of his evidence made the following very strong statement:—
I have no hesitation whatever in saying that the medical arrangements connected with the Army in
India have been for years and years most disgraceful. I say that with a full sense of responsibility.
I have served many years in India. I have not been there for some time now, but in my opinion things
are not better than they were. Anything more disgraceful than the carelessness and want of attention
with regard to the sick soldier in India it is impossible to imagine.

About this item

Content

A signed proof, folios 1-100, plus additional material, folios 101-124. The cover bears the signature of Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State. The report has been annotated in blue pencil at various points.

Contents:

  • 'Part I. Preface.
  • 'Part II. Origin of Mesopotamia [Iraq] Expedition.'
  • 'Part III. Advance from Basra to Kurna.'
  • 'Part IV. The Advance to Amara [Al-'Amārah] and Kut [Al-Kūt].'
  • 'Part V. Correspondence and Telegrams as to Advance on Baghdad.'
  • 'Part VI. The Advance from Kut to Ctesiphon.'
  • 'Part VII. Operations for Relief of Kut.'
  • 'Part VIII. Armament, Equipment, Reinforcements, &c.'
  • 'Part IX. Transport.'
  • 'Part X. Medical Breakdown.'
  • 'Part XI. Causes Contributing to the Errors of Judgement and Shortcomings of Responsible Authorities.'
  • 'Part XII. Findings and Conclusions. Recommendations.'
  • 'Separate Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP.'
  • 'Appendix I. Vincent-Bingley Report.'
  • 'Appendix II. Memorandum by Sir Beauchamp Duff.'
  • 'Appendix III. Colonel Hehir's Account of the Siege of Kut-el-Amara.'

Additional material:

  • Folio 101. Manuscript note [by Arthur Hirtzel] on net military expenditure.
  • Folios 102-109. Copy of the East India (Army Administration), Further Papers regarding the Administration of the Army in India , 1906.
  • Folios 110-115. Manuscript notes, titled 'Suggested redraft & amplification of second half of parag 1' [unknown hand].
  • Folio 116. A clipping from the Daily Telegraph , Wednesday 4 July 1917, featuring an article titled 'Mesopotamia. Ex-Viceroy's Statement. The Medical Breakdown.'
  • Folios 117-124. An expanded typescript version of Hirtzel's manuscript notes (folio 101).
Extent and format
1 volume (122 folios)
Arrangement

A table of contents can be found at folio 4v.

An index can be found at folios 93-97.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 110-115; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence. The volume comprises a stitched pamphlet, and other stitched and loose-leaf material.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎49r] (97/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x000062> [accessed 23 February 2025]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x000062">'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [&lrm;49r] (97/248)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x000062">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/IOR_L_PS_20_257_0097.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image