Skip to item: of 248
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎30v] (60/248)

The record is made up of 1 volume (122 folios). It was created in 1906-1918. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

58
PART IX.—TRANSPORT.
B. Railways.
51. We have already considered the manner in which the Indian Government
dealt with inland communications by water. We now turn to the question of com
munications by rail. In August, 1916, Sir William Robertson, the Chief of the
Imperial General Staff, informed the Committee of Imperial Defence : “ As regards
the question of communications the Committee is aware that India declined to
sanction certain proposals for railway construction, and that in general operations were
allowed in 1915 to develop without proper regard to the vital questions of supply and
maintenance.’' The justice of this criticism on the Indian Government became apparent
to us when we ascertained that two applications from the General Officer Commanding
in Mesopotamia had been made to the Indian Government for the building of railways,
that on each occasion the application was based either on the grounds of improving supplies
or communications, and that on each occasion the application was not agreed to by the
Indian Government.
52. The first mention of the desirability of a railway in Mesopotamia was made by
General Barrett, then General Officer Commanding the Expedition, on February 28th,
1915. He wired to India :—
I consider that the best solution for any advance towards Nasariyeh or even one or two marches beyond
Shaiba would be a light railway. Once Nasiriyeh was reached, the railway would be much used for moving
produce to and from Basrah. Thus, if it were once constructed, it would not only solve our supply difficulty,
but would also tend towards pacifying the country.
In a subsequent telegram General Barrett explained that he had asked for the railway
because he found it impossible otherwise to move any force larger than one brigade across
the desert. On March 13th he sent in particulars of the route which he suggested the
railway should follow, and added, “ I recommend that personnel and material should be
in Basra by May at latest, as I think it important that work should begin as soon as floods
subside.” So far as we can ascertain no action appears to have been taken by the Indian
Government on this application, except that they instructed Sir John Nixon (who succeeded
General Barrett in April, 1915) to report on the possibility of the employment of a light
railway of which material for 137 miles was available in India. The Indian Government
apparently did not attach importance to General Barrett’s recommendation, although it
was put forward on the military grounds of the desirability of facilitating supplies and com
munications and increasing the mobility of the force.
53. Owing to the flooded state of the country and other reasons into which it is not
necessary to enter, it was not till the beginning of August, 1915, that Sir J. Nixon raised
the question of rai ways with the Indian Government.
On August 2 nd, 1915, he telegraphed to the Chief of the General Staff in India asking
for particulars as to the 137 miles of light railway understood to be available. He asked
if it was the railway—said to be very indifferent—which had been used at the Coronation
Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). .
He also wrote to tell the Chief of the General Staff that he did not want that material,
but that he did want a railway. On August 11 th, 1915, the Chief of the General Staff
wrote to him that he had backed up his request for a railway, and had proposed standard
light 2 -ft. 6 -in. material used by the North-Western Railway, and not the light military
( Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). ) line.
On August 14th Sir J. Nixon forwarded to India a long despatch, supported by
memoranda from his technical officers, in which he asked for a railway from Basra to
Nasariyeh on ( 1 ) military, ( 2 ) political, and (3) commercial grounds. The military grounds
were principally the necessity for quick communication between Basra and Nasariyeh.
General Nixon added a demand for a suitable staff to carry out the preliminary work
in October, and concluded—
Finally it is most desirable that the general policy, as regards the railway, which I strongly recommend
as necessary, shall be determined as early as possible and a decision communicated. Next cold weather,
November to March inclusive, should be availed of to the fullest extent not only in preliminary investigation
but in actual construction.
54 . General Nixon’s despatch reached Headquarters in India on August 25th, but as
he had received no reply to it by October 24th, he then wired to India asking how the
question of railway construction in Mesopotamia stood. He was informed on October 30th
that the matter was still “ under the consideration of the Government.” A further
reminder from General Nixon on November 1 st at length produced a reply from the Chief
of the General Staff, Delhi, on November 14th, that “ for the present the Government

About this item

Content

A signed proof, folios 1-100, plus additional material, folios 101-124. The cover bears the signature of Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State. The report has been annotated in blue pencil at various points.

Contents:

  • 'Part I. Preface.
  • 'Part II. Origin of Mesopotamia [Iraq] Expedition.'
  • 'Part III. Advance from Basra to Kurna.'
  • 'Part IV. The Advance to Amara [Al-'Amārah] and Kut [Al-Kūt].'
  • 'Part V. Correspondence and Telegrams as to Advance on Baghdad.'
  • 'Part VI. The Advance from Kut to Ctesiphon.'
  • 'Part VII. Operations for Relief of Kut.'
  • 'Part VIII. Armament, Equipment, Reinforcements, &c.'
  • 'Part IX. Transport.'
  • 'Part X. Medical Breakdown.'
  • 'Part XI. Causes Contributing to the Errors of Judgement and Shortcomings of Responsible Authorities.'
  • 'Part XII. Findings and Conclusions. Recommendations.'
  • 'Separate Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP.'
  • 'Appendix I. Vincent-Bingley Report.'
  • 'Appendix II. Memorandum by Sir Beauchamp Duff.'
  • 'Appendix III. Colonel Hehir's Account of the Siege of Kut-el-Amara.'

Additional material:

  • Folio 101. Manuscript note [by Arthur Hirtzel] on net military expenditure.
  • Folios 102-109. Copy of the East India (Army Administration), Further Papers regarding the Administration of the Army in India , 1906.
  • Folios 110-115. Manuscript notes, titled 'Suggested redraft & amplification of second half of parag 1' [unknown hand].
  • Folio 116. A clipping from the Daily Telegraph , Wednesday 4 July 1917, featuring an article titled 'Mesopotamia. Ex-Viceroy's Statement. The Medical Breakdown.'
  • Folios 117-124. An expanded typescript version of Hirtzel's manuscript notes (folio 101).
Extent and format
1 volume (122 folios)
Arrangement

A table of contents can be found at folio 4v.

An index can be found at folios 93-97.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 110-115; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence. The volume comprises a stitched pamphlet, and other stitched and loose-leaf material.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎30v] (60/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00003d> [accessed 19 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00003d">'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [&lrm;30v] (60/248)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00003d">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/IOR_L_PS_20_257_0060.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image