'File K/1 Letters of Good Offices' [‎224r] (447/480)

Ref. File No.16/V#0.(Closed).
P.A.
Letter from Haji Abed Ali bin Rajeb is submitteu nerewitn.
It relates to his old claim against a Dubai subject which was
referred to the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. Agent, Sharjah vide letters dated 19th
November 1929 (P 57) and dated 15th April 1950 (P 122) vide
correspondence on the subject in File (pages 56, 57, 11 l J, 11 ^,
113 , 114 , H 6 , 119 and 122). He claims that in accordance with
the Salifah ruling in vogue the Hakhuda filmed Bu Guful who en
gaged his diver (llansur Nascati) is responsible for his cl«*im
as he employed the latter without his Werqa. Ihe Shaikh of Lubai
however does not agree to this and has not recovered the b^luJice
debt i.e., Rs 533/- irom his subject the Nakhuda involved.
UAy write another letter in continuation of our letter t*t
page 122 to the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. Agent, Sharjah on the subject and ask
him to do his best to recover the balance claim for the nnji.
T’l
-7^
13/6/34
ll
P.A.
Draft letter to the R.A.Sharjah is submitted below for
your approval.
18.6.34
.No. 67*- Liter to R.A.Sharjah issued.
r
tL
J/U
Letter No.523/v.0.ciatea 19.C.34. to R.A.Snarjah issuea.
PA
No reply has yet been received from R.A.Sharjah to the
%bove letter. May the attached reminder draft be issuea pi ?
At
7-r
7.8^4 di-
1
S.Nc.-6^» Letter No.599/Y.C.dated 7.3.34 to R.A.Sharjah issued.