'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [337r] (680/778)
The record is made up of 1 volume (385 folios). It was created in 1903-1906. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
of India in the Foreign
S! l a , m > and , he had Wm
Dated Karachi, the 17th April 1904.
From—M ajor P. Z. Cox, CA.E
T0 “ L ' D; p a r ront ESq -’ t0 the GOT ™‘
»yo„ r l, f e° g u r : d m f h : “r a T , - * -
my ii:z th : TT f : eatyou through whi %-sX°c? w^h ra-tM o„ o P ; olunteer
iteternng to the draft article as a whole I am cnrp +V, Q u *
heart nor forget, if we pressed him nr f -fi ^ sure ^e Sultan would never forgive us at
ment on such line" tE it “ ac, l uiesoe “ any^arrange-
the matter he might be obliged or heavily bribed^ do sof"^ ° £ ° Ur S ™ path y and su PP ort in
such tV^ToooLsLfaT^l^hdrib “ifbein^^Tll 40 Fra,1?e r Crything she wants -
examiued. included m it being wholly meaningless when practically
For instance—
t ZtT^lTn^ th0 Fren ° h C ° U,d DOt ha - thdr — ^ injured
“ property in French Colonies”.-this clause would simply legalise the present
colourable device by which a Suri, wheu he wants a flag, pays the pric^of a hut in a Ech
rmanently LmS^afsar^ ^ ^ biS £ortearS d ° and a1 '^ ^ave
GUuse III. “ Their immovable property on land to be subject to local laws”—This
LTm,Plf COn TT!! K ^ eS r ta Vn Who11 ^ illuSOr > r ’ for if a Maskat sub Ject living in Sur
rat^^nnl^ 0 ^^^!^ a ^ ail ? st tb e Sultan, it stands to reason, afd at any
^ e J°" ld certaml J ^ the case in practice, that the Sultan would not dare to interfere with
him or his property, and the protege and his household might snap his fingers at the local
with 1 Hp any n exten 1 i y for lf m 0 . les ted, or his property were in danger of being interfered
with, he would merely have to insinuate a French flag, and if it were touched, a case would
in Su^creek 00000 ^ ^ 1DSU fc to tiie as was tbe case w ben the
dhow
A term adopted by British officials to refer to local sailing vessels in the western Indian Ocean.
was recently fired at
“ Protection to be extended to families in direct descent from Trench Proteqes ” —In
time, and with the assistance of a little jugglery in the matter of Arabic names, which
is a simple matter, the greater part of the male population of Sur would claim French
protection against the jurisdiction of the Sultan and his local Wali, with little dano-er of
detection, as the latter would not be in a position to verify, and would be afraid to run risks
^ bh® Sultan of Maskaf s administration were at all a civilised one, it might be different
but knowing as they do how unscrupulously he has been taken advantage of in the past and'
the dubious methods by which the protege venture has been fostered, I confess it is somewhat
heartbreaking to me to see such a scheme seriously passed on by the Home Government)
We might just as well have conceded the whole position when the issue was first raised in
1900, and thereby have saved the Government of India and its local officers a good deal of
worry during the last four years.
The Hague Tribunal is at all events a presumably fair and unbiassed Court. The case
will be treated on its merits, and none of the parties concerned can have legitimate cause to
complain at the verdict whatever it is. Where is the advantage in upsetting that arrangement
now, and giving away to France a locally important case, which we are almost certain to win ?
Even if the British Government can get some compensating concession from the French
for letting them have their way in this, I cannot see that we have any right to allow the
Sultan to go to the wall on our account, and I can assure you that if that contingency should
arise, it would do lasting harm to our good name in Oman.
I have little doubt that the Government of India have set their faces against the proposal,
but I have seen so much of the question, and it has given me so many anxious moments, that
it can hardly be wondered at if I feel strongly about it and, perhaps, exaggerate its importance.
If the Viceroy were at home one would have no anxiety, but knowing how keen the
French Government will be to rush it through, as they have everything to fear from the Hague
Arbitration, and knowing that His Majesty’s Government will be in a conciliatory mood owing
to the recent happy rapprochement and agreement with France, I cannot help fearing that
Maskat interests may go to the wall.
With apologies for writing at such length.
About this item
- Content
The volume discusses a dispute between the British and French Government’s over the use of French flags on Muscat dhows and individuals dhow A term adopted by British officials to refer to local sailing vessels in the western Indian Ocean. owners from Muscat claiming to be protégés of France owing to their vessels being registered as French.
The two governments agreed in October 1904 for the dispute to be taken to the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, and the award, which was approved by the British Government in September 1905, was concluded primarily in favour of the British Government’s position. The complete award in English and French can be found at folios 135-141.The papers include reports and discussions on other matters linked to the arbitration case including the limits of Oman territory; the question of ownership of Gwadar; and the legal status and nationality of the Khoja peoples residing within Muscat and Oman. The principal correspondents in the volume include the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Henry Charles Keith Petty-Fitzmaurice, 5th Marquess of Lansdowne); the Secretary of State for India (William St John Fremantle Brodrick, 1st Earl of Middleton); the Secretary to the Government of India in the Foreign Department (Louis William Dane); the Viceroy of India (George Nathaniel Curxon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston); the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. and Consul at Muscat (William George Grey); the French Consul at Muscat (Lucien-Ernest-Roger Laronce); the French Ambassador to the United Kingdom (Paul Cambon); and representatives of the Foreign Office and the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .
The volume is part 1 of 3. Each part includes a divider which gives the subject and part numbers, year the subject file was opened, subject heading, and list of correspondence references contained in that part by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (385 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 733 (Muscat Arbitration) consists of 3 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/25-27. The volumes are divided into 6 parts with parts 1 and 2 comprising one volume each, and parts 4, 5, and 6, comprising the third volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the main foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1 and terminates at the back cover with 386; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
Condition: The spine has become detached from the volume and has been placed in a polyester sleeve at the back of the volume as folio 395. The sleeve may result in some loss of sharpness in the digitised image.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [337r] (680/778), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/25, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100026193162.0x000051> [accessed 31 March 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193162.0x000051
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193162.0x000051">'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [‎337r] (680/778)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193162.0x000051"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x0003de/IOR_L_PS_10_25_0680.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x0003de/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/25
- Title
- 'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:9v, 10br:10bv, 10r:13v, 15r:28v, 30r:32r, 34r:41v, 42v:106v, 115r:121v, 135r:135v, 142r:163v, 165r:167r, 168r:170v, 172r:172v, 173v, 175r:194r, 195r:206v, 207v:218v, 220v:232r, 233r:240v, 243r:247v, 249r:298v, 301r:310r, 311r:312v, 314r:323v, 324v, 326r:327v, 333r:349v, 352r:359v, 367r:368v, 375r:376v, 383r:385v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence