'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [168v] (343/778)
The record is made up of 1 volume (385 folios). It was created in 1903-1906. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
Telegraph Station at Mussendom.
part of Sooleyman, the Chief, I merely stated, in reply, that I was acquainted
with the Joasmee Chief, and that he is on terms of friendship with the British
Government. At the same time I inwardly felt that, if it he really true that
Huhbalayn is subject to the Joasmees, and not to Muscat, discussions might
possibly hereafter arise with reference to our cable ; and this anxiety it was
that led me to notify the circumstance to Government in my letter above
referred to, though time was not at my disposal to enter into details on the
subject: Muklmkoo, the second village specified, is distant from Hubbalayn
some two miles by sea and three miles by land, is a place of occasional resort for
the inhabitants of lluhbalayn, and is, in fatty under thu am hoi-ity ot the Onief
of Hubbalayn: Muklub, situated as it is between, and in close proximity to, the
villages named, is, therefore, in like manner, subject to the Chief of Hubbalayn.
Although from the manner in which Sooleyman made known to me that he
considers himself a subject of Sheik Sultans I thought there might be some
truth in the statement he advanced, I felt by no means disposed to credit the
story until I had cautiously instituted enquiries on the subject. Without,
therefore, appearing to attach much importance to the fact of whose depend
ants the Hubbalaynites might really prove to be, I commenced endeavouring
to investigate the matter. One of my guides, a native of the Bunder Abbas
Districts,"assured me that the Hubbalaynites were “ lying ” (I make use of his
own expression), and that they are the subjects of the Sultan of Muscat. The
Wallee of Khussub repeatedly maintained that they are such, and went so far
on one occasion, I understand, as to make statement to that effect in the very
presence of Sooleyman, which statement Sooleyman did not attempt to refute.
Matters standing thus, and perceiving no means of obtaining reliable inform
ation on the spot, I at last determined to put the question. direct to His
Highness Syed Soweynee in writing, without, however, mentioning that the
people of Hubbalayn claim to be exempt from His Highness’s authority. Copy
and translation of the correspondence that has up to the present moment
passed on this subject I do myself the honor to enclose with this letter. It
will be seen therefrom that His Highness distinctly claims Kims sab, Muklub,
and the places in their neighbourhood as forming a portion of his dominions.
Unless, therefore, the Joasmee Chief puts forth counter-claims to Muklub, I
see no‘cause for any difficulties or obstacles arising with reference to tele
graphic communication across the isthmus dividing Elphinstone’s Inlet from
Malcolm’s Inlet. If, on the other hand, counter-claims be advanced
by the Joasmee Chief, I see no wiser course than to purchase out and out,
in behalf of the Sultan of Muscat, from the Joasmee, the rights the latter
pretends to possess over the locality, and subsequently to deal solely with His
Highness Syed Soweynee. I hope, however, no such necessity will occur.
* For a time, say the next two or
three months to come, Telegraphic
Officers and Establishment will be
located at Muklub and will require
protection.
(Sd.) H. D.
3. Muklub is a rocky, desert piece of ground, inconveniently distant from
water, inconveniently distant from resources, and
there is no intention, I believe, to utilize the spot
for any* permanent purpose save that of burying
our cable across it from one inlet to the other and
constructing upon it a land line. Khussab, and
not Muklub, is to be the Telegraphic Station, and so I gather from Colonel
Stewart, all we expect from the people of Hubbalayn and Mukhukoo is that
they should refrain from interfering with and should protect the cable and
land wire; that they should from time to time inspect the cable at its shore
ends, covering any portion that may accidentally be laid bare, and finally,
that they should immediately report to the Telegraphic Establishment at
Khussab any injury or accident that may have occurred to either cable or
wire. To ensure the attainment of these objects it will, of course, be necessary
for us to conciliate the Chief and his dependants, and this, in their case, can
About this item
- Content
The volume discusses a dispute between the British and French Government’s over the use of French flags on Muscat dhows and individuals dhow A term adopted by British officials to refer to local sailing vessels in the western Indian Ocean. owners from Muscat claiming to be protégés of France owing to their vessels being registered as French.
The two governments agreed in October 1904 for the dispute to be taken to the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, and the award, which was approved by the British Government in September 1905, was concluded primarily in favour of the British Government’s position. The complete award in English and French can be found at folios 135-141.The papers include reports and discussions on other matters linked to the arbitration case including the limits of Oman territory; the question of ownership of Gwadar; and the legal status and nationality of the Khoja peoples residing within Muscat and Oman. The principal correspondents in the volume include the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Henry Charles Keith Petty-Fitzmaurice, 5th Marquess of Lansdowne); the Secretary of State for India (William St John Fremantle Brodrick, 1st Earl of Middleton); the Secretary to the Government of India in the Foreign Department (Louis William Dane); the Viceroy of India (George Nathaniel Curxon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston); the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. and Consul at Muscat (William George Grey); the French Consul at Muscat (Lucien-Ernest-Roger Laronce); the French Ambassador to the United Kingdom (Paul Cambon); and representatives of the Foreign Office and the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .
The volume is part 1 of 3. Each part includes a divider which gives the subject and part numbers, year the subject file was opened, subject heading, and list of correspondence references contained in that part by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (385 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 733 (Muscat Arbitration) consists of 3 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/25-27. The volumes are divided into 6 parts with parts 1 and 2 comprising one volume each, and parts 4, 5, and 6, comprising the third volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the main foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1 and terminates at the back cover with 386; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
Condition: The spine has become detached from the volume and has been placed in a polyester sleeve at the back of the volume as folio 395. The sleeve may result in some loss of sharpness in the digitised image.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [168v] (343/778), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/25, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100026193160.0x000090> [accessed 31 March 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193160.0x000090
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193160.0x000090">'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).' [‎168v] (343/778)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026193160.0x000090"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x0003de/IOR_L_PS_10_25_0343.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x0003de/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/25
- Title
- 'P. 1 733/1904. Muscat Arbitration. (1904-08).'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:9v, 10br:10bv, 10r:13v, 15r:28v, 30r:32r, 34r:41v, 42v:106v, 115r:121v, 135r:135v, 142r:163v, 165r:167r, 168r:170v, 172r:172v, 173v, 175r:194r, 195r:206v, 207v:218v, 220v:232r, 233r:240v, 243r:247v, 249r:298v, 301r:310r, 311r:312v, 314r:323v, 324v, 326r:327v, 333r:349v, 352r:359v, 367r:368v, 375r:376v, 383r:385v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence