Skip to item: of 310
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [‎164v] (255/310)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (163 folios). It was created in 2 Jan 1902-21 Mar 1904. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

!' i
V
I told M. Cariibon that the result of my inquiries had b^en to convince me
that there was not much substantial difference of opinion amongst us, and I
read to him the paragraphs (a, to {e) on p. 4 of the Memorardum.
His Excellency listened with evident approbation, but somewhat demurred
to the statement in paragraph (e) to the effect that holders of the French flag
ought not to be allowed French protection when in the territorial waters of
Mask at.
He promised, however, to consider carefully what was said in the Memo
randum.
I am, etc.,
(Signed-) LANSDOWNE.
Inclosure 2.
M emorandum.
The communication made by the French Ambassador on the 14th August
last, with regard to the use of the French flag by dhows belonging to Maskat
and Sur, had received the careful attention of I lis Majesty's Government, and
the statements made by His Excellency have been referred to the British autho
rities concerned.
I ; ^ hile giving full credit to the officers employed by the French Govern
ment in inquiring into the proceedings of these vessels for an impartial desire to
ascertain the facts, His Majesty's Government are unable to resist the conviction
derived from information which lias reached them frc m various sources, that a
considerable amount of slave trading has been carried on by some of the dhows,
and that the protection atforded by the French flag has been abused for this
purpose.
Two of the dhows arrested by His Majesty's ship " Sphinx " in 1896 were
found to contain 200 negroes, of whom the greater part must have been slaves.
In June 1900 it was reported to His Majesty's Government that nearly
1,000 slaves had been imported into Sur that season. Of these 560 were believ
ed to have been brought in by dhows flying the French flag.
His Majesty's Consul at Maskat reports that since 1st April 'coo he has
manumitted at the British Consulate 79 slaves-of these ,9 we're unable to
distinguish between one Mag and another, and the depositions of 12 others are
not recorded in the Consulate ; but of the remaining 18, no less than 14 deposed
that they had been brought from Africa in dhows flying the French flag.
A statement made by a British Indian subject resident at Sur on the subject
of the slave season of 1901 is annexed to this Memorandum, and seems to show
c.can} tr.at t^c rrench flag is used to a considerable extent in this traffic.
It seems probable that the inquiries made by the French ship of war " In
ternet on this subject may have failed to elicit "the facts in consequence of the
precautions adopted by the dhow A term adopted by British officials to refer to local sailing vessels in the western Indian Ocean. owners to ascertain before arrival at Sur whe
ther a vessel of war is present there, and in that case to land their cargoes and
remove all suspicious features before coming into port.
2. 1 he part taken by the British Consul in the countroversy between the
v ultan and the French Consul on the question of the use of the French fiar bv
His Highness subjects has been greatly misunderstood by the French Govern-
nient, ^ 1 hey are in the first place, entirely mistaken in supposing that the
pultan s Prime Minister receives a pension from the Government of India The
late Wr of the Sultan, Saiyid Saeed bin-Muhammad, did not receive from the
british or Mntish Indian Government anything either in the way of pension or
j r jsents Nor h; s the British Consul ever made use of the subsidy given bv the
Government of India to the Sultan for the pi rpose of exercisirg influence in
r gard to the question of the flag. It has, on the contrary, been the bultan

About this item

Content

The volume comprises correspondence and other papers relating to competing British and French interests in Muscat and Oman at the beginning of the twentieth century. The principal point of contention between British officials, represented by Percy Cox (Muscat Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. 1899-1903), was the use of the French flag by Omani vessels, permitted by the French Vice-Consul to Muscat, and regarded by the British as being exploited by the region's slave traders as a means of avoiding interference by British ships.

Items of note include a letter from Cox to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. (Charles Kemball), dated 2 January 1902, discussing relations since 1891 between the Sultan of Muscat and British and French officials, the abuse of the French flag in the town, and the need for diplomatic negotiations between Britain, France and the Sultan to resolve the situation (folios 1F-37). Enclosed with Cox's letter is an eyewitness account (from a British Indian subject residing in Soor [Sur]) of slave trading activity in the town during 1901 (folios 31-35). The file also includes a letter from Cox to his French counterpart (Roger Laronce), dated February 1902, explaining that the Sultan protests at what he describes as the French Government's claims to exercise jurisdiction in Muscat territory over Omani subjects (folios 70-71), and Laronce's reply (folion 73); and a report of a tour of the Muscat coast aboard HMS "Amphritite" by Cox (folios 120-22) and Charles Windham, the "Amphritites's" captain (folios 147-49).

Reference is made in a number of pieces of correspondence to a confrontation between Arab slave traders and the Portuguese in Mozambique on 18 March 1902 (folios 117-118, and 140-141). In May 1903 Cox writes to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. , informing him that he has received information from the British Vice-Consul at Mozambique, of around 100 inhabitants of Muscat and Sur being captured and killed in the confrontation (folios 178-180). Cox uses this incident to repeat his recommendation that a British Agent be installed at Sur (folios 145b-145d). Arrangements are also made to loan the Sultan of Muscat funds to enable him to buy his own steamer (folios 123-127), which Cox hopes will encourage the Sultan to take responsibility for his coast, and in particular Sur (folios 135-138). A blueprint of the steamer acquired for the Sultan is included in the file (foldout plan, folio 169).

Extent and format
1 volume (163 folios)
Arrangement

The papers contained in the volume have been arranged in rough chronological order, from the earliest piece at the front of the volume to the latest at the end.

There are two indexes at the front of the volume. The first (found on folio 1A) includes a list of subjects with folio numbers. The second is titled an 'Index of references' (folios 1D-1E), and includes descriptions of correspondence with folio numbers.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: The volume is foliated from the front cover to last page, using a combination of two numbering systems. The first foliation system uses blue or red pencil numbers in the top-right of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. and top-left of verso The back of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'v'. pages. This foliation system is the original foliation system, and is used in the references index pages (folios 1D-1E). This foliation is used on all pages with text, both recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. and verso The back of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'v'. . The second, more recent foliation system uses circled pencil numbers in the top-right corner of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. pages only, and is intended to fill the gaps left by the earlier foliation system. Foliation anomalies: 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F, 145A, 145B, 146C, 145D. Foldout item on folio 169.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [‎164v] (255/310), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/1/552, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x000038> [accessed 21 December 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x000038">'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [&lrm;164v] (255/310)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x000038">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x00020d/IOR_R_15_1_552_0255.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x00020d/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image