Skip to item: of 310
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [‎160r] (246/310)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (163 folios). It was created in 2 Jan 1902-21 Mar 1904. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN MASKAT BY FOREIGNERS. TRANSFER OP
PROPERTY IN OMAN.
J
| > '
No. 433, dated Maskat, the 27th September 1902.
From—M ajor P. Z. Cox, I.S.C., C.I.E., His Britannic Majesty's Consul and
Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Maskat,
To—The Under-Secretary to the Government of India in the Foreign Department
I have the honour to acknowledge with thanks the receipt of your letter
No. 1755-E,A., dated 28th August, on the subject of the transfer of property in
Oman.
2. I beg in the first instance to explain further the two points of Maskat
usage in regard to which your letter expressed some uncertainty—
{a) The law regarding the alienation of wakf property in Maskat is the
same as that holding in India, but the difficulty is that Arab
subjects in charge of obscure wakf property have been found
tempted, when in want of money, to mortgage sucli property
secretly to Banyans on the pretence that it is private property,
and it may not be for many years afterwards that the death of
the mortgagor or his failure to pay the interest causes the
Banyan Merchant of Indian extraction. to bring the case into Court. Then the defence is set
up by the man or his heirs that the property was wakf and
ought never to have been mortgaged; sometimes with reason
and sometimes with intent to defraud.
(h) It is the usage in Maskat for the complainant to be sent for justice,
by his national representative, to His Highness the Sultan if the
defendant is a Maskat subject and to the defendant's
representative if the defendant is a foreign subject. The com
plainant's Consul or the Sultan (in the case of an Arab) has the
right of sending a representative to attend the trial, if he so
desires.

3. The suggestion contained in the concluding paragraph of your letter
seems to provide, as far as is possible under the circumstances, the remedy
that my reference contemplated. On receipt of your communication I dis
cussed the subject with the Sultan, and we both came to the conclusion that
it would not be possible to trust to any system of registration conducted by
his clerical establishment, he, therefore, undertook, by officially promulgating
it in Arabic, among his own subjects, to make applicable to them any notifi
cation I might draw up affecting British subjects.
4. Under ordinary circumstances I should have first submitted a draft
notification to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, for approval, but
there were strong reasons existing connected with Monsieur Goguyer's present
active intrigues which made it important to act at once. I therefore issued on
13th instant, in anticipation of sanction, the notification, of which I attach a
copy for the information of the Government, together with a copy of my
covering letter to the Secretary of State.
6. I have purposely left out any special mention of the fact that any
document executed in contravention of the notification would not be recog
nised at this Consulate, as, had I done so, it would have been necessary to add
some qualifying words, such as, " so far as it affects the British subject." So
far as our subjects are concerned, however, the mere fact that the non-regis
tration is made penal, carries with it the fact that any such Unregistered
document is invalid for purposes of a civil court,
908 F. D.—S E—116—Oct.

About this item

Content

The volume comprises correspondence and other papers relating to competing British and French interests in Muscat and Oman at the beginning of the twentieth century. The principal point of contention between British officials, represented by Percy Cox (Muscat Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. 1899-1903), was the use of the French flag by Omani vessels, permitted by the French Vice-Consul to Muscat, and regarded by the British as being exploited by the region's slave traders as a means of avoiding interference by British ships.

Items of note include a letter from Cox to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. (Charles Kemball), dated 2 January 1902, discussing relations since 1891 between the Sultan of Muscat and British and French officials, the abuse of the French flag in the town, and the need for diplomatic negotiations between Britain, France and the Sultan to resolve the situation (folios 1F-37). Enclosed with Cox's letter is an eyewitness account (from a British Indian subject residing in Soor [Sur]) of slave trading activity in the town during 1901 (folios 31-35). The file also includes a letter from Cox to his French counterpart (Roger Laronce), dated February 1902, explaining that the Sultan protests at what he describes as the French Government's claims to exercise jurisdiction in Muscat territory over Omani subjects (folios 70-71), and Laronce's reply (folion 73); and a report of a tour of the Muscat coast aboard HMS "Amphritite" by Cox (folios 120-22) and Charles Windham, the "Amphritites's" captain (folios 147-49).

Reference is made in a number of pieces of correspondence to a confrontation between Arab slave traders and the Portuguese in Mozambique on 18 March 1902 (folios 117-118, and 140-141). In May 1903 Cox writes to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. , informing him that he has received information from the British Vice-Consul at Mozambique, of around 100 inhabitants of Muscat and Sur being captured and killed in the confrontation (folios 178-180). Cox uses this incident to repeat his recommendation that a British Agent be installed at Sur (folios 145b-145d). Arrangements are also made to loan the Sultan of Muscat funds to enable him to buy his own steamer (folios 123-127), which Cox hopes will encourage the Sultan to take responsibility for his coast, and in particular Sur (folios 135-138). A blueprint of the steamer acquired for the Sultan is included in the file (foldout plan, folio 169).

Extent and format
1 volume (163 folios)
Arrangement

The papers contained in the volume have been arranged in rough chronological order, from the earliest piece at the front of the volume to the latest at the end.

There are two indexes at the front of the volume. The first (found on folio 1A) includes a list of subjects with folio numbers. The second is titled an 'Index of references' (folios 1D-1E), and includes descriptions of correspondence with folio numbers.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: The volume is foliated from the front cover to last page, using a combination of two numbering systems. The first foliation system uses blue or red pencil numbers in the top-right of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. and top-left of verso The back of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'v'. pages. This foliation system is the original foliation system, and is used in the references index pages (folios 1D-1E). This foliation is used on all pages with text, both recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. and verso The back of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'v'. . The second, more recent foliation system uses circled pencil numbers in the top-right corner of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. pages only, and is intended to fill the gaps left by the earlier foliation system. Foliation anomalies: 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F, 145A, 145B, 146C, 145D. Foldout item on folio 169.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [‎160r] (246/310), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/1/552, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x00002f> [accessed 9 March 2025]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x00002f">'File 59/15 B (A 14) Muscat: slave trade under cover of French flag' [&lrm;160r] (246/310)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023813967.0x00002f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x00020d/IOR_R_15_1_552_0246.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x00020d/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image