مجموعة ٣٠/ ٣٦ "البحرين: ادعاء يوسف لطفعلي خنجي، وهو أحد الرعايا الفارسيين، ضد الشيخ حمد فيما يخص مصنع للثلج" [و‎‎١‎١‎٩] (٣٤٠/٢٣٧)

r
5
/t
7038
H
19 31
■ ^ • ■ iw \mf y
and the prooeedff being divided equally, or
(2) By e&oh perty taking one half of the ^aohlnery and each
being entitled to earry on a eimiler business on their
own aooount.
We might point out that in May 1929 Shaikh
Hamed brought the question of the partnership before the
Politloal Agent and oxer client 1 * Agent was sailed before
that gentleman* It was suggested by our silent 1 s Agent
that Shaikh Hamed should remove from the Factory one of the
two seta of lo© Plant and that thonseforward each party
should work in thetr own account. This was agreed to by
Shaikh Hamed and thereupon, w© are told, judgment was
entered by the Political Agent on these terms. Three
days after this dee is ion an Engineer appointed by Shaikh
Hamed attended at the Faotory for the purpose of selecting
and removing one of the machines, but Shaikh Haraed Informed
our client that as the season was so near there was not
tiae to remove the plant and erect it in the intended place
or to obtain the servioes of an Engineer to work the plant.
Shaikh Homed thereupon decided to postpone the removal
until some convenient later date, and in the meantime left
th* frechine in our cli«nt f s factory* Otir didn't then
eontinued to work one machine only for himself, and in fact
has never used the other nachlne since.
Of course, bf before any agreement were
reached as to a settler*mfc, t^e wtmleipelity removed any
of the partnership assets, our client would reserve his
rights to hold them liable therefor.
*?e shall be obliged if you will consider the
position as shown above and by the correspondence and let us
have your views and advie© thereon. Any recommendation as
to what course is the proper one for our client to adopt
/will