ملف ٢٢\٢٣ III مؤتمر الكويت [و‎‎٧‎٤] (٢٠٠/١٤٧)

7 ek'- n s gsion or tk- co;n-' t R :-:c>
8*h.. .ipril H 2 i.
Ihe eel den; at- ed tht. Xr ni> Jordanian Delegatee
wIxclI they had to eay to tiae ^ajd proi otal of a pleoiecite in
that they could not agree and laid the following written
statcfiitnt before the < onference;-
" Ve htirti already proved in the previoue meetings of the
Conference that Jauf SaJc&ka and ^adi Eirhtn are part of Bvria
ouitaole boundary exicts between Irane-Jordan!a,which ig &
iJixri oi lyria,and Najd. 'ihe Najd ^elegation,howc.vtr,maintained
that they could not give up thit dietriet becauee it is on
their line of communication with Damascus. We,in order to
coait to peace, tuen suggested that the discussion should be
comined to this line of communications or in other words to
Juuf and Bakaka alone, which should bo formed into an
independant state recognised at such by both parties. The
Hajd delegation however would not agree. Kr.President .then
suggested three ways oi settling the case, (l)
(l^ that V,di firhan be divided between the two parties.
(2; that a plebiscite be heId,or
(3> that Jaitf and Wadi Cirhan be formed into a state
Clever ament . You further have told us at the Session of 26th
considered the suggestions in accordance with our instructions
and reply accordingly.
adi Tirhan on condition that a plebiscite were also agreed
E "
to for iurabah and Kharmah. The irons-Jordanian delegates said
separated from Hajd by the sandy Nafud than which no other
under Ibn Dha*lan.
iou as&ed us to communicate those suggestions to our
at the
March ifc24/Yull Conference that tlie Uajd Delegation would agree
to a plebiscite in Jauf,Sr*kaka and tfadl Cirhan,provided a
peloiscite be alto held in Kharmah and xurabah also. It
have communicated all this to our Government and have giBw Bt iMKr iid