Coll 28/111 ‘Persia. Kermanshah – Political diaries.’ [‎215r] (432/751)

«• £ •»
}
allow them to settle elsewhere,; as the (ioveraisent ahould
decide. The proposal v/ae considered' at 4 melag hold
by the Ufctaii&ar with military arid Grendameile chieia,
with the ioliticai Adviser pr*seat by iiiVitation, upon
dUL^HAY/uN* a return, and although the oner was probably
temporising and otherwise unsatialttotorj, waa tele & raphed
to Tehran. It was presumably roco^iiibca as such by the
Gov£rument lor the Chiei oi the General otaii. tiA&kAHAt
subeequently telegraphed to the Or dicer GoBsaanaing the
Xe man shah (l‘gth; Brigade pruposiiig tlnee a iternat-ive
courses of action for rounGin* up the aaoEIB 1 s - (a) by
usirifc, ti ibal elements only; ^b) by senuixitj a ruliy—
equipped oolumn, with artillery, ri^om xQHUiikAiAAB^iPj auid
(c) by using looal Persian military forces, a combina
tion of anu (c> was iccoHiaenueci to Tehran and quickly
W cel wed approval* T*c Gompaniea of the nermanahah
Brigaue will be used, with tribal assistance, and at the
mni: nf the uioi*th Gh iiHElxJiShAhX v»as senuir^ oupplics to
ii£i^L.4b in I'eaainess ana was await iiig liual order a iroia
Tehran to commence operations. Rather surprisingly the
JA'ditfEUi)! 1 s are amongst the triocs wo oiier their support.
14. The proposal to disarm the relatively ».iall KhRG/J^.
ana ol,0i BIAH sections of the xwu-HUR tribe in karch and
April last (April Piary, paragraph 14) came to nothing.
A decision was tsjteu early in auxy uy the Ustanuer, xn
consultation «xth GbliBHAfAR, BtlAfiMUAdojiAhX anu the
Farmanoar oi oHAHaBAp to oauertsae this operation now
th&i the tribes ¥^ere comped in MAHduAodT, where they are
believed to be responsible xor a good ueai oi the
insecurity in thexrareo arounu the main roac. instruct
ions were iesued to the la man oar of anu tne
bakhshdar of the ivABHUR, QABIm i^Ati A 1 asAPx, but by the
ena of July little or nothing haa been done.
15. Reports were received about the JOth of impending
trouble between the A0ROHAN«*i~LAitOM end JA^ANRUDI e.
The latter had some reason to fear an attacw by ^UrAlilSAJ)
AMIN B&G of 1AV&H, son of J A 1 ArAti 8ULT4M, probably es a
reprisal for the dawanruai attac of the Spring oi 1.^0.
It was allegeu that ^UHAMliAb AMIR n>^o, who r^ceiitiy
▼isited Bagdad for medical treatmont f on his return
journey called on BAM ID BIG, former ^AB.MA^Att of ZAnA&JA
ana AFRA8IAB LARUnX, ia exile, to
AMlt'i xsBG later admitted the visit but denied un^hos ^