Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [116r] (231/248)
The record is made up of 1 file (122 folios). It was created in 21 Jun 1942-15 Mar 1946. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
i
1*uoL*>ol. OfyCcjk.
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOYERNMEN
PERSIA.
ITEN
CON FIEfENTI AL
E 5057/14/34]
v\^?'aLo*»
August 23, 1942.^^'^^
— •
ole ch-ka^t , Jvt
Section 1. Wt>jvx4Aj f ^ / J/v
Copy No. J 2 2
.i-*"
R. Bullard to Mr. Eden.—(Received Auqust 23.)
(No. 270.) V y 1
^ r ’ , Tehran, August 14, 1942.
/ /frc u ITH reference to my telegrams describing the day-to-day development of
the recent Cabinet crisis here, ending in my telegrams Nos. IPO S^nd 1004, I have
the honour to inform you that the fall of All Soheily ’s Cabinet on the 30th July
came as a surprise to many observers. I propose in this despatch to attempt to
analyse the reasons for Soheily’s resignation, as well as to describe shortly the
political events which followed it, culminating in Ahmad Qawam’s presentation
of his new Cabinet to the Shah and the Majlis on the 9th August.
2. The ex-Prime Minister, in his farewell statement to the Majlis, a
summary^) of which I enclose hereinv^attributed his resignation to the lack of
sympathy shown by the Majlis and the press to his Government’s efforts to deal
with current problems. There is no doubt that a number of Deputies, chief
among whom were Ali Dashti, Saham-us-Sultan Bayat and Dr. Malik-Zadeh,
were opposed to Soheily and did their best to make difficulties for him. Their
explanation of their conduct was that Soheily, in order to obtain their support,
had made a number of promises to them which he did not fulfil; for instance, he
had promised to award the post of Minister of the Interior to Farajullah
Bahramy (Dabir-A’zam), but had not kept his promise. Bayat was openly
working for the post of Prime Minister, and Dr. Malik-Zadeh was hoping for a
lucrative appointment in the university. Soheily was forced by the Majlis to
attend endless secret sessions in person, after which the same subjects were often
discussed in public without any regard for any decisions that may have been
taken in secret session. To many observers Soheily appeared to be afraid of the
Majlis. Nevertheless, the public, such as it is, seems to have recognised that the
Majlis were unreasonably obstructive, and there has been much criticism of
the Deputies.
3. As for the press, there were certainly a number of attacks on various
members of the Cabinet and on the Cabinet’s policy as a whole in certain Tehran
newspapers, and an attempt to control the press by a new law evoked so much
opposition that Soheily felt obliged to abandon the struggle. Certain Majlis
Deputies were of the opinion that, if he had been courageous enough to use the
powers which were already at the disposal of the Government in virtue of the state
of military law which still exists at Tehran, he could have checked this irrespon
sible criticism without recourse to new legislation. But, most important of all,
there was much criticism of the Government for failing to deal adequately with
the question of food distribution. Adequate powers had, admittedly after much
delay, been given to Government by the Majlis, but nothing effective had been
done to check hoarding, and the occasion, if not the cause, of the crisis ending
in the downfall of the Government was rioting in towns such as Malayir and
Burujird, where the new harvest is already available, and there was no excuse
for bread shortage. It is only fair to add that there are some grounds for
believing that the riots were not spontaneous. But it is an undoubted fact that
the Government were unwilling to deal with hoarders, and many people hinted
darkly that prominent officials, and even Ministers, were in the racket themselves.
The Government certainly did little, if anything, to suppress the widespread
corruption of the country, and there were a number of scandalous rumours about
financial and moral irregularities committed by the Prime Minister himself.
4. The unfortunate incident of M. Aliy’s appointment as ambassador to
the Soviet Union may also have helped to undermine Soheily’s self-confidence.
When Mohammad Saed Maragha’i was brought from Kuibyshev to take over
the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, it appears that Aliy’s appointment to replace
him was decided by the Shah, Soheily and the Soviet Ambassador without any
formal notification to Ahy, the result being that the latter became annoyed,
hinted that he would not go, and finally resigned from the Cabinet three days
[33-10]
Not printed.
ECo- r
L> Mb
rS
| Cid-r n B ‘J
| «](
U.'k
f+LkcaJ.
Or
About this item
- Content
This file consists of miscellaneous dispatches relating to internal affairs in Persia [Iran] during the occupation of the country by British and Soviet troops. The file begins with references to an Anglo-Soviet-Persian Treaty of Alliance, signed in January 1942, which followed the Anglo-Soviet invasion of the country in August-September 1941.
Most of the dispatches are addressed by His Majesty's Minister (later Ambassador) at Tehran (Sir Reader William Bullard) to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Anthony Eden). The dispatches discuss political, financial and economic affairs in Persia, as well as issues regarding road and rail transport (for the transportation of foodstuffs), food supplies and press censorship,
Related matters of discussion include the following:
- British concerns regarding the extent and effect of Axis propaganda in Persia and the Persian Government's response to it.
- Relations between the Shah [Muhammad Reza Khan] and successive Persian prime ministers, and the power and influence of the Majlis deputies.
- Anglo-Persian relations, and British concerns regarding Soviet policy in Persia.
- The Persian press's response to the Allied occupation.
- The Tehran conference in late November 1943, attended by Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin and Franklin D Roosevelt, who were also present at a dinner at the British Legation, held in celebration of Churchill's 69th birthday (also discussed is the naming of three streets in Tehran, after Churchill, Stalin, and Roosevelt respectively).
- The tribal situation in Persia.
- The raising of the status of the British Legation in Tehran to that of British Embassy in February 1943.
- The United States' interests in Persia.
- The status of Polish evacuees in Persia.
- The work of the British Council in Persia.
- The question of the withdrawal of Allied troops from Persia.
The file includes a divider which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence (folio 1).
- Extent and format
- 1 file (122 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [116r] (231/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/564, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100042321850.0x000020> [accessed 29 March 2025]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321850.0x000020
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321850.0x000020">Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).' [‎116r] (231/248)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100042321850.0x000020"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000517.0x00011a/IOR_L_PS_12_564_0231.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000517.0x00011a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/564
- Title
- Ext 5001/41 'PERSIA – INTERNAL (Miscellaneous despatches).'
- Pages
- front, front-i, 2r:8v, 10r:123v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence