Skip to item: of 116
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

‘Précis of correspondence on international rivalry and British policy in the Persian Gulf, 1872-1905.’ [‎35r] (70/116)

The record is made up of 1 volume (58 folios). It was created in 1906. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

fZ' ; \
'
I
\
59
190. In his report No. 334, dated 28th August 1901, Captain Cox furnished
m 4. t ? m u kt o the most reliable information he could pet
Secret E., November 1901, Nos. 74-83. n/r i i i i •«
No. 79 (Enclosure No. i). at Maskat and concluded :—
Briefly stated, it appears from the foregoing that the Sultan's jurisdiction extends ,
effectively only as far as Mureir ; that from MurHr to Dibba (including, however, only half
of that port) there is reason to suppose that the Sheikh of Shargah may make good a pre
scriptive claim to exercise jurisdiction; that over the country from Dibba on to Ras
Musandim and thence round to Khasab and Bokha, the Sultan, if asked, would probably
claim rights of sovereignty and jurisdiction; and that from Bokha to Shuam the coast is
mainly occupied by sections of the Shihooh who for practical purposes at present recognise
the authority of the Sheikh of Ras-ul-Kheimah.
In conclusion, if I may presume to do so, I would respectfully express the opinion that,
as regards the Malcolm and Elphinstone Inlets on either side of Maklab and the promon
tory of Ras Musandim, the exercise of the Sultan of Maskat's authority over there is of
such a conveniently uncertain character that it would seem possible for His Majesty's Gov
ernment to treat the question of its existence according to the political exigencies of the
moment. If we require a base there, it might be possible to explain to the Sultan that his
claim to assert his authority there or power to make it effective is of such an unsubstantial
nature that His Majesty's Governmentare unable to recognize it, but regard the Shihooh
(including the Kumazereh) as independent tribes.
191. Colonel Kemball» in submitting Captain Cox's report, referred to the
correspondence of 1864* and stated that
• See Trudai chiefs Precis, 1854-1905. since then His Highness the Sultan had es
tablished a Wali at Khasab situated on the
Elphinstone Inlet, and further north the Sultan's authority with regard to
Kumzar near Ras Mussandim was now apparently not contested by the
Joasmi Chief, as pointed out by Captain Cox. It seemed to him, therefore, that
from our point of view, as we are hardly likely to require Khor-ash-Shem as a
naval base, it would be more convenient to recognise the tract as within the
territories of the Sultan of Maskat. It would be perhaps advisable that the
Slultan should be induced in the manner indicated by Captain Cox to make his
influence more apparent in the locality in question.
192. Ihe Government of India asked for a further report from Captain Cox,
after visiting the coast at an early date and ascertaining the actual political
situation at the various places (No. 1863-E.A., dated 31st October 1901).
193. Captain Cox's further report No. 290, dated 2nd July 1902, and Colonel
Kemball's views thereon (letter No. 15-
Secret E, No.ember .902, No,. 7-«. s ^ 20th j uly , g02) are summed
up and discussed in the despatch of the Government of India, No. 192, dated
23rd October 1902, and Lord Curzon's Minute accompanying it, which are
printed below :—
"With reference to the correspondence ending with Your Lordship's Secret despatch
No. 33, dated the 30th May 1902, on the subject of the selection of a naval base in the
Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , we have the honour to forward, for Your Lordship's consideration, copies
of the papers noted in the enclosed list. .
Your Lordship will recollect that in November last we invited attention to a sugges
tion made by our local officers than the jurisdic-
• Ftrfe our Secret despatch No. 180 (External), ^j on 0 f t j ie gultan of Maskat should be extended
dated the 7th November 1901. an( j consolidated along the Batineh coast: and
we intimated that, before expressing an opinion on this suggestion, we proposed to await
a further report from our Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. at Maskat. The conclusions at which Major
Cox has arrived, after a tour along the coast, are summarised in the 13th paragraph of his
report No. 290, dated the 2nd July 1903, which forms the second enclosure to this despatch.
2. It will be observed that, as regards the Maklab isthmus and the promontory of
Musandim, Major Cox is of opinion that the Sultan's jurisdiction is of so uncertain and
ineffective a character that it would be open to His Majesty's Government either to
1
i
recognise or to ignore its existence, as might be found most convenient; and he suggests
that, in view of the possibility of the Elphinstone Inlet being required for naval or strate
gical purposes, the old telegraph quarters on the Inlet should now be re-occupied by the
posting there a Native Agent Non-British agents affiliated with the British Government. in charge of a British flag, as at Bassidore. Major Cox
proposes that to carry out this measure, our Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. should
visit the locality in the telegraph ship Patrick Stewart, without previous reference to the
Sultan of Maskat, who could be informed, if necessary, that the step is necessitated

About this item

Content

The volume, stamped ‘Secret’ on the front cover and frontispiece, is a précis of British Government correspondence relating to international rivalry and British policy in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. between 1872 and 1905. It was prepared by Judge Jerome Antony Saldanha of the Bombay Provincial Civil Service, and published in 1906 by the Government of India Foreign Department, Simla, India.

Saldanha’s preface to the volume, dated 29 January 1906, lists other volumes of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. Précis where materials relating to British policy in the Gulf may be found, and summarises the change in British policy in the Gulf under Lord Curzon’s [Viceroy of India, 1899 to 1903) administration (from ‘“spirited” active policy’ to ‘passive vigilance’). The contents of the volume’s chapters (with chapter titles shown in italics) run as follows:

1. Evidences of Foreign activity in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , covering: the increase in Russian influence in the Gulf (movements of Russian individuals and the appearance in the Gulf of Russian merchant vessels); French and German activity in the Gulf, including the Frenchman Hyacinthe Chapuy; the activity of other foreign powers (chiefly the United States); and a tabulated list of foreign naval vessels known to have visited the Gulf;

2. Colonel Pelly’s proposal for establishing the Political Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. main Telegraph Station and Coal Depot near Cape Mussandim [Musandam, Oman] , 1863 ;

3. Suggestions for improving British interests in Persia and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , 1885-86 ;

4. General policy in the Gulf, 1899-1903, including: Lord Curzon’s despatches on foreign activity in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. and measures to be taken to maintain British interests; Lord Curzon’s despatch, dated 9 November 1901, on Russia’s intentions to construct a railway line through Persia, and Russia’s designs on the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; a minute, written by Lord Curzon, on Russian ambitions in eastern Persia and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; important pronouncements and declarations of policy by the Marquess of Lansdowne (Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, then British Secretary of State for War), 1902-03;

5. Lord Curzon’s tour in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , November to December 1903 ;

6. Selection of a naval basis in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Question of control and jurisdiction over the coast of Khor Kalba [Kalbā] , on the Batinah coast to Tibbat near Khor-as-Shem [Khor ash Shamm], including: movements of the Russian cruiser Gilyak in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , 1900; the question of control of the entrance to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , and jurisdiction over the coast from Kalba to Tibbat; the political and strategic value of Kishm [Qeshm] and Hormuz, and the question of the telegraphic connection with Bassidore, 1902; reoccupation of the old telegraph buildings at Elphinstone inlet and the erection of flag staffs at certain points near Mussandim [Musandam]; the Fajeira [Fujairah] dispute;

7. Telegraphic communications with Maskat [Muscat] , Henjam [Jazīreh-ye Hengām] and Bandar Abbas [Bandar-e ʻAbbās] , 1899-1905 , including: telegraphic connections with Maskat, and proposals for the extension of the line to Bandar Abbas, reestablishment of the telegraph station at Henjam; extension of the telegraph line to Bandar Abbas; encroachment of Persian customs officials on telegraph station ground at Henjam, and the erection of Persian and customs flag staffs on the island; Persian customs interference with Henjam mail bags, 1904-05;

8. Our position at Bassidore [on Qeshm island], including: the alleged intention of Russians to take possession of Kishm [Qeshm], and the British position at Bassidore; the extent of Bassidore territory; proposed emigration of the Bu Smeit tribe from Lingah [Bandar-e Lengeh] to Bassidore, 1987-1901; the desire of Shaikh Ahmed bin Abdullah bin Mether of Jezirat Shaikh Shuaib to emigrate to Bassidore, 1902; proposed British trading settlement at Bassidore, 1902; immigration of Persian subjects to Bassidore, 1905; refusal of the Persian merchant Moin-ut-Tujjar’s request to be allowed to store red ochre at Bassidore, 1905;

9. Marine survey of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. of certain naval harbours in the Gulf , including: surveys of Bahrain waters, Bushire and Koweit [Kuwait] harbours and Khor Abdulla; survey of Khor Kaliya, Bahrain; report on Khor Musa; report on Charbar Bay;

10. Protection from foreign enterprise the rights of Arab tribes in the pearl fisheries of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .

Extent and format
1 volume (58 folios)
Arrangement

The volume is arranged into ten chapters, preceded by a preface and contents page. Each chapter is organised by subheadings, and its paragraphs numbered. The paragraph numbers are continuous throughout the whole volume, beginning on 1 at the start of the first chapter, and ending on 333 at the end of the tenth chapter. A contents page at the front of the volume (ff.4-5) lists the chapters by their headings and subheadings, with each referred to by paragraph, rather than page, numbers.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: The foliation sequence commences at the front cover, and terminates at the inside back cover; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Pagination: The volume also contains an original printed pagination sequence, with page numbers located top and centre of each page.

Condition: There is a small amount of insect damage, in the form of small holes, to most pages. This damage is restricted to the margins of the pages, and therefore does not affect any text.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

‘Précis of correspondence on international rivalry and British policy in the Persian Gulf, 1872-1905.’ [‎35r] (70/116), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/C247, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100024116549.0x000047> [accessed 26 June 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100024116549.0x000047">‘Précis of correspondence on international rivalry and British policy in the Persian Gulf, 1872-1905.’ [&lrm;35r] (70/116)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100024116549.0x000047">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000884.0x0001cd/IOR_L_PS_20_C247_0070.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000884.0x0001cd/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image