مجموعة ٣٠/٢٤ "بلاد فارس والخليج الفارسي، البحرية الفارسية. زيارة الموانئ العربية" [و‎‎٥‎٢] (٩٠٨/١١٢)

SECRET
no/DE!
"oupS)
6494
(COPIES
CE(CULATED)
£JE.£-X. £JLO„— Q., £ T_E„t. E. iLJLAJt.
103
Pci It leal Ret:lcnsr?t in tho
Ptirs*iai; A Gull to Foreign
St j cret£u*y to the Governroent
pf Iiidia, Foreign Political
Department, and repeated by
former to Secretary of State
for India*
XXX
Dated
Received
Kuwait, 24th November, 1932*
11*50 a*m« 24th Novemberj 1932* if r*
1
1
IZ1QJL- Addressed to Foreign and repeated to
Secretary of State for India, Minister at Tehran. Your
telegram of the 21st instant, ^2621, Visits of Persian
vessels to Arab ports*
Minister’s Despatch No,463, paragraph No 0 7*
I quite agree that Minister’s arguments have weight* At
the same time, If visit of Persian warship is made to
Sheikh’s territory without notification, which is the
contingency I have in mind, then Persian Government have,
ipep facto, disregarded independence of Sneikh concerned
and I do not think a ceremonial call on ruler, such as
might be paid by Persian representatives on a Persian
governor or notable in a Persian port, would make up for
non -not if 1 c at ion, while acceptance of such a calx by
ruler would surely condone non-notification and. weaken
any subsequent protest* Moreover, effect on opinion,
in state of ruler, of such acceptance would be undesirable
and would not of course be corrected by a protest made at
Tehran®
'
vi
X.
*1*. J UXUr SflZArMr.
^ v* #>-C- iJL U£- AA-Xf 6 k~/LtJUA 221 * fii-d
t$J<- ylfvCvi' LuJbuu*. ua 2ZL ^ (K.U.yLmA4A v •
!/• U+’tCi aa-. ZU. vJurU* *) (ST ZU v\f£
«*s r
i : ^
yi