"الملف 14/115 VII الملحق (B 9) أكسيد جزيرة أبو موسى: مواد خلفية حول هذه القضية" [و‎‎٣‎٣‎٠] (١٩٠٤/٦٨٦)

foralng nr. onelooun, to ay of let Marsh 1008. 2iO
lisn and Abaul Lntlf have nover ouggested that Haraa tob not
the oianeging partnor for tho sale of the oxide •with the
knowleds© of all w .
wMoh
mi, true tv'jod/graritod a monopoly for a. years to
1 onckhaus, was a now and rsMHoai departure from the praotioe
01 the past? It was olearly a privilege which It was not
within uasrm's compotane© to grant without contiultlng his
partners and by his taotioa in emteaveuring to keep the
1,0101 «ooiw©nt Booret froa hi a partners Hasan showed
that h© knew very well that he had acted ultra vires and
that they would object as eoon as they underatood the effect
of the docua©nt»
The grotmd for Esa's action was (vide his letter of SOth
rehruary l'< to sheikh Sagar) that "Ilaoan Gfvaaiyoh has no
deed of authority from me siting him any general power in
regard to the action which he aight take respecting the
lease ©tc. w ^
nor had he. Jli« conduct of affaire e.g. hie refusal to
render any accounts* hie inclination to ignore his partners
and his readiness to buy untheir chares#.warrant the con-
.irctur- ^idunhr #€; b; o' a ..Li nne «# - « . hi a aim
# \
was to tire out,or to buy out* the others and get the con
cern into his own hands. j
las). X X BE, iiALCOLU CJOUi.0 HOT DO AMYTKISa ALI^OUQH HE WAS
■ ■ A PARTS ER, BSCAUOK AS imi31vxdual PARI'HRU BAB «0 Rlui-T
\AST X X X X It COULD MOT BE STATED MORE DlUTIifCTLT
g , THAT HAS AX SAUAlll Hi TBI MAHACXMO PAKTHIH?. ^ .
tis- 'f J \.r ^ .'/•.r I*■*f- 7 4
fyvT yh e-'j-i-f*,-*- A .i .. '■ ;
h h'&ly d^y 'toL& : « 7- 4 ^
//• *x t2 &&la i4a ^jy\A* m J x tAt */ A-* \ .
> <*''s fOd/i i t t t-n. \ r -
In this regard generally I would observe that the British
MsBorandusrs aald no sore than that there mm were no docu
ments in their posfseoeion to indicate that Hasan was
Managing partner.
Other docunento f such ac Malcoln*® deed of partnership
<ahhex