"الملف 35/85 IV A 11 التحكيم الخاص بمراكب الداو الشراعية في مسقط" [و‎‎٩] (٤٩٢/٢٠)

X.
10
v-
Pro jet. de reglemerrD concernant,
application de la sentence pro-
^ noncee par le 'Tribunal Arbitral de
la Haye le 3 Aout» 1905.
Remarks by iiis Majesty's Consul
at Muscat upon the French Consul's
plan for applying the sentence of
the Court of Arbitration.
Article 1.
Les sujets du Sultan
qui sont autorises a I'avenir a
arborer le pavilion francais sur
leurs navires jouissent dans 1'Omar
du meme traitement et des memes
droits que tous les autres sujets
de Sa iiautesse.
Article 2 . En principe les per
sonnes autorises a arborer le pa
vilion francais sur leurs navires
sont celles dont la liste a ete
dressee par le Consulat de France
a Mascate, et remise au Consulat
d'Angleterre le 4. Mars 1906, a
moins de modifications pouvant
resulter du deces ces personnes ou
de retrait par la France de 1'au-
torisation.
-t
Article Les proprietaires
de boutres battant pavilion fran
cais
"
2. . Impossible, as, supposing
every owner to have received au
thorisation for one dhow between
136S and 1392 (for which we are
obliged to take the word of the
French) only those would be entitled
to retain it who had actually the
same boat sailing under a French
flag at the time the iiague sentence
was pronounced, and his number of
boats could not be increased subse
quently according to our reading of
the terms of the award (vide Mr.
Graham's despatch of 3th August 1905
to which I was referred for guidance
"by the Government of India in their
telegraii 'i201 E,B. of 21st November
3 ist).and my list and remarks on
that of the French..
There would be no objection
to the proprietors selling their
dhows
I