"14/196 معاقبة شيخ الفجيرة. الشيخ حمد بن عبد الله الشرقي." [و‎‎٦‎٣] (٥٣٠/١٣٥)

Prom. The Eosid©nay Agent Shargah.
To The Honourable the Political Resident in. the P.Gulf*
Ho 375.
Dated 3x,at October 1925.
A.C., ' .
Pitb reference to your letter Ho 1P5 dated 9tb September 1925.
giving cover to a letter addressed to Shaikh Hamad bin Abdullah the
. : . ■ .
chief of Fujairah, I now beg to state that I wrote a letter under Ho I
328 dated 11th Rabia-ul-Awal 1544= 2>o^f- Zb{) expressing my good advice 1
I
to him and sent all these letters through Shaikh Said bin Hamad in
order that he should send them to the former Shaikh.
On the 23rd Rabiaiul Awal=/£»-/0-^5” X received a letter from I
the said Shaikh Said stating that he has sent the letters(sent for
despatch)through one All bin Ahmad iruila Husain Shargah and a
Resident of Kalba to Shaikh Hamad bin Abdullah and that the said
COndtJ
messenger has/back telling him that Shaikh Hamad of Fujairah would
not give an answer to the letters sent to him. I beg to forward here!
with,in original,the letter addressed to me by Shaikh Said bin Hamad
On the 26th Rabia-ul-Awal,however,,T received a reply from Shaikh
Hamad bin Abdullah of Fujairah as well as an answer to your * s. T beg
to submit them all herewith for your information. He says that Shaikh
Said has constructed a godown and a well in a place beyond his
territorial limit and that the Shaikh of Braimi has intervened bet-
ween him and Shaikh Said and has caused a reconciliation and that
he(Shaikh Said) has permitted the Shaikh of B r afmi to demolish the
/ ' ’' r ’
godown. This is a thing,! beg to state,that has not taken place,
and I have not heard about it.
■ shaikh Hamad’s reply,however,shows that his action in regard ’Ij
' - '
to the godown and the well are correct and it further proves that he
has committed the. burning down of the place be is said to have burnt]
I again'wrote him a letter under Ho 359 dated 27th Rabia* ul
Awal i?44=/6-/0-a5 saying that the question between him and Shaikh
Said bin Hamad and what he (Shaikh Hamad bin Abdullah) says has not
been done by him are things which seem to have happened as it is
infer/ed from the purport of his letter and that he has buried the
well because it has not been in territory of Shaikh Said bln Hamad. j|