مجموعة ٣٠/ ٣٦ "البحرين: ادعاء يوسف لطفعلي خنجي، وهو أحد الرعايا الفارسيين، ضد الشيخ حمد فيما يخص مصنع للثلج" [و‎‎١‎٥‎٤] (٣٤٠/٣٠٧)

(tSSr)
r
Hall & Co. Cont'n Shed No. ^
To
The Under Secretary of State
for Foreign Affairs.
Date
24/J.2/30
one of its kind.
if 'We shall he pleased if you will inform us what, in
the circumstances, laws apply to the Island and in what Court
or way our client's claim would he decided, as If it he either
British or Indian law, our client would desire to he represent
ed hy an Advocate specialising in the particular law. Further,
since any action brought hy our client would necessarily include
Shaikh Hamed as a Defendant, it seems an impossible situation
th^t the latter or any member of his Government should he in
a position to act in any Judicial capacity.
^ If our client should he dissatisfied with an^r
decision given, can you inform us whether there is anyappeal
and if so to what Court#
We think you will agree that were Snglish Law to
apply -
(a) the disposal hy Shaikh Hamed of his share in the partnership
without our client's consent, to the Municipality, add
(h) the action of the Municipality in entering upon the
partnership premises and working the plant without our
client’s consent
would he wrongful acts which could he restrained with oonse-
quential damages and thatif without our client's consent they
or any one else entered the p“* 'ses and removed any part of