مجموعة ٣٠/ ٣٦ "البحرين: ادعاء يوسف لطفعلي خنجي، وهو أحد الرعايا الفارسيين، ضد الشيخ حمد فيما يخص مصنع للثلج" [و‎‎١‎٢‎١] (٣٤٠/٢٤١)

B;/ Mr Mg. 11
Shaikh Hamed Alkhalif&
tkxmiH
Persian Gulf
Sir,
Aa no doi«>t you are aware, fcr* Y.L* Khonji haa
eonsulted MB with reference to the purported sale by you to the
Maaea* Baladiya of your share in the Xo® Plant and the purported
grant by you to them of a sole monopoly for the sale of laee In
Bahrein for 5 years.
You will appreciate that our client is a subject
under the control of the provisions of Kis Britannic Majesty 1 *
Order in Council of 1913 whioh, as amended by the King^s
Regulations fto.l of 1984 sets out the Indian Acts as applicable
to Bahrein, It would appear that neither under the Order in
Council or Indian law is there any authority whioh enables you
to grant a monopoly to the Manama Baladlya as to prevent our
client from carrying on his existing business.
It is our client 9 a intention to bring the metter
before the District or Joint Court and to endeavour by all
lawful means open to him to protect his rights whieh he is
advised he is entitled to, and failing his obtaining
satisfaction in that Court he will carry the matter to the
appropriate Appeal Court,
We trust Jhat you will at once get in touch with
the municipality and endeavour to have the matter adjusted
according to the respective rights and to see that a proposal
is made without delay to compensate our client for the loss he
has sustained.
Falling this being done, our client will have no
alternative but to take all neoessary steps to protect his
interests.
We are. Sir,
Your obedient servants.