مجموعة ٣٠/ ٣٦ "البحرين: ادعاء يوسف لطفعلي خنجي، وهو أحد الرعايا الفارسيين، ضد الشيخ حمد فيما يخص مصنع للثلج" [و‎‎٨‎٣] (٣٤٠/١٦٥)

Hamgmm
f j
/
Copy.
^75/14-2
(E 3249/5249/91)
1 O
) i O
BRITISH LEGATION,
TEHRAN.
1st July, 1932.
My dear Rendel,
You will have received from the India Office
a copy of Biscoe’s report to me on the Khonki ice-plant
at Bahrein case. I had meant Biscoe’s report to he
addressed to the India Office hut that is an unimportant
detail.
If action has not already heen taken, I suggest that
the India Office proposed to Khonji’s solicitors, Messrs.
Hall & Go. (see their letter to Foreign Office of
24th December, 1930) that Khonji seek a settlement on
the lines indicated in Biscoe f s despatch and enclosures;
that you inform the Persian Minister of this and take
the opportunity of expressing regret that the Persian
Government should have thought it desirable to hold the
language contained in the note of 24th September 1931
(see Dodd 1 s despatch No.572 of October 12th); and I will
tell Feroughi that a detailed report has been sent to
London as a result of which I hoped that Khonji would be
able to reach a settlement.
You may think it a bit late in the day to express
displeasure about the tone of the Persian note. I am
inclined to hink it is, especially as Feroughi provided
me v/ith an opportunity of doing so by referring to the
Khonji case in a note on an entirely different subject.
Yours ever,
(Sgd) R.H. HOARS.
G.W. Rendel, Esq. ,
Foreign Office.