"ملف C 14/11 إسرائيل كادو (ملف شخصي)" [و‎‎٤] (٣٢/٧)

(9
’V
MINUTE
Ptf>
Please see enclosure 5A. There are a number of
points that arise from this letter regarding Kadoo’s
contract, leave, etc.
2. E.O. Contract . ladoo has no contract and in view of
the F.O. remar!cs I suggest he be given one as soon as possible
for three years with effect from. 1.4.49. I am drawing up
a draft c ntract for both -ladoo and Mohsin and I suggest
we refer this to the F.O. for approval when completed.
3. Salary . I cannot under stand how the F.O. arrive
at a basic salary of Rs. 310. Kadoo commenced his service
on 1.12.41 and on the present basis of Rs. 250 x Rs. 10 -
Rs. 350. his basic salary from 1.4.49 should be Rs. 330^1.e.
7 years service to 1.12.48 plus one increment upon
consolidation on 1.4.49.)
4. .Ye have already informed the Residency of this
(see enc. 3 A) but I suggest we tatce it up with the F,0. direct.
5. Leave from 1,4.49 to 31.3.50 Ee will be entitled
to the full annual 30 days for this period. He has already
had 36 days leave during this leave year so has exhausted his
present entitlement. The extra 6 days leave will count again
st certain accrued leave due to him - see next paragraph .
6 . Leave prior to 1.4.49 The F.O. have agreed Tadoo can
be allowed paid leave for the period 15.8.4^ to 31.3.49 at the
rate he was entitled to under Government of India rules.
Vhatthis entitlement is nobody here seems to Know. Israel
held no contract during his Govt, of India service but from
attached booK of ,f fundamental Rules ?t page 56, para 10A, it
appears to be one twenty second of the period spent on duty.
On this basis we have F.O. approval to allow Kadoo 27 days
paid leave. However he has already had 6 days - see para
5 above. The rate of pay for the leave being that on the
day the leave commences (see attached publication, page 57
para 16(1)(b).