"ملف F/2 II مراسلات متنوّعة مع بلدية المنامة" [و‎‎٣‎٧] (٤٦٤/٧٣)

< 3 ^
TRANSLATION.
On Saturday tne SLna Sai’ar 1S54, the Manamah Baiaaeyah
Budget Cominittee cornposeu of tne undermentioned persons, held
tneir meeting:- l.Haji Khalil bin Ibrahim al iiuayyaa (BJHaji
(4)Shaikh Isaq oin Abdur Raiiman si Khan (5; Haji Hasan bin
Abdul Aziz al Ajaji (J; Haji Muhsin bin Anmaa ai Tajir (7R
Husain Ali Kadhim Busheri and (8) Haji Muhammaa bin Husain
al Larazi.
Haji Abdul nziz al ^usaibi ana Brothers, witn a list of the
Baladeyah r s current account. Before discussing this, his
presence was required as he might nave some arguments in
support oi what he alleged in his letter. The matter was
therefore postponed for another cate on which he should appear |
before the Committee.
B. Two letters dated 11tn Safar lo54 sent to the Balaneyan
by Haji Ahmad bin Muhsin bin Salloom. The first one is about
his non-acceptauce of tne payment of its. 183/4/6 due from him
on account of arrears of taxes on the properties of Shaiku
Ahmad bin Ali bin Ahmad Al Khalifah for the ycax' i35i when
those properties were under his control, on the ground that
the an ears oi taxes were due from tne owner - he oeing a
contractor. Thereupon oilice produced tne correspondences
which tooAplace between tne Baladeyan and tne owner of the
property and also the correspondences between the Eal&deyah ssn ;
ana Haji Ahmad bin Muhsin bin Salloom. As it became clear
to the Committee tnat t^ces oi the early months were paid by
Ahmad, so they decided that these arrears should likewise be
paid by him. But as he is not the property-owner and the
taxes now claimed by the on ice were not received by him as
he so says, it has been decided that he should pay only
its.oi/l/o, third of the amount claimed and the remaining
two thirds are to be waived off.
ihe second letter is about the sum of its.lJu/- wnicn he does
Ali bin Muhammad Kanoo (3j Haji
TIT-
I'll
unammad oin Hamad al Qadhi
not admit that itis